Tuesday, July 9, 2013

The National Institute of Justice SORNA Challenge

Department of Justice sealOriginal Article

So now we are giving away cash and prizes? The laws do need to change, and drastically.

Developing Strategies to Measure the Implementation Costs and Public Safety Benefits of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA)

Table of contents:


Section I. Overview
To improve the effectiveness of sex offender registration and notification programs in the United States, Congress passed the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-248).

NIJ's SORNA Challenge seeks creative and innovative research strategies for future researchers to use when studying (1) the implementation costs associated with complying with SORNA and/or (2) SORNA's public safety benefits (examples include, but are not limited to, the Act's general and specific deterrent effects, its effect on law enforcement's ability to prevent crime, and its effect on the public's ability to protect itself). Contestants may propose a research strategy for one or both of these sets of issues ("Challenge components"). One cash prize will be awarded for each of these two Challenge components. A proposal addressing only one of the Challenge components is eligible for only one of the prizes, whereas a proposal that addresses both Challenge components will be eligible for both prizes (see Section VI).

Sex offender registration programs serve several important public safety purposes, including tracking sex offenders as they are released into the community, providing information to law enforcement that may assist in investigating crimes and apprehending criminals, curbing sex offender recidivism (which is already in the single digits), and deterring would-be sex offenders. Typically, sex offender registration programs also involve public notices and make information about released sex offenders more broadly available to the public for the purposes of crime prevention and self-protection.

Empirical research on sex offenders has grown over the past decade, but no study to date has examined the multifaceted effects of SORNA, specifically the wide range of costs that have been or may be incurred in implementing SORNA, or the public safety benefits achieved with SORNA compliance.
- Sure they have, you just haven't looked for them!  Here is just one (PDF).

This Challenge seeks to advance the sex offender research literature by developing a comprehensive strategy for further research measuring SORNA's costs and public safety benefits. [1] It provides an opportunity for practitioners and researchers to think creatively about how broadly to define, operationalize and ultimately measure those costs and benefits.


2 comments :

Mark said...

"Sex offender registration programs serve several important public safety
purposes, including tracking sex offenders as they are released into
the community, providing information to law enforcement that may assist
in investigating crimes and apprehending criminals. . ." It also destroys all "intrastate," and "interstate" jurisdictional lines, and feed the FBI data which is the real reason for these laws. And to give police the "edge" so their "hunt" will be to their advantage, not to mention the irrevocable failure of these laws to halt, diminish, or curtail a sex crime.

scholarly ambition said...

This exploitation of sex offenders must stop. I now have a very different approach to the public, "kids" and any action I might have taken in the past to assist law enforcement as a U.S. citizen has forever changed. Almost 800,000 people now on the registry. A number large enough to effect change and communication in an organized fashion. Sex offenders now have an edge in any directed approach to better their own lives. I live near a park, and there is much more "action" down there than will ever be at my house. There are more unreported and unknown offenders than listed on the registry. If law enforcement spent their time wisely, they would be much less scrutinized.