Thursday, January 3, 2013

SD - South Dakota continues to ignore constitutional rights and grand stands to make themselves look like they are actually doing something!

Marty Jackley
Original Article


PIERRE - Federal authorities recently certified that South Dakota’s Sex Offender Registration continues to implement the provisions of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Attorney General Marty Jackley says sex offender registration and community notification are an important part of his office’s work to improve the safety of the state’s citizens. He says in coming years, the state will continue to enforce registry compliance. South Dakota completed the renewal process in November and the Department of Justice has reaffirmed the status.

South Dakota was the fourth registry in the nation to be certified. The compliancy rate in the state is 98.5%. The A.G.’s office says that 3,052 sex offenders reside in the state with just 47 identified instances of non-compliance. State law requires those convicted of sex crimes to register as a sex offender within three business days of coming into any county to live. Sex offenders must re-register every six months. The Attorney General’s office works closely with local law enforcement and prosecutors to update the registry.

Last year, the state entered into agreements with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe to become registered entities of SORNA. The agreements allow the tribes to maintain their own offender registries and have their sex offender’s data submitted electronically to be included into the South Dakota Sex Offender Registry.

The following is the comments we left on the article, which we are sure will be deleted, that is why we are posting them here.

And they continue to ignore their oath of office to defend the Constitutional rights of everybody, including ex-sex offenders, just to help themselves look "tough" on crime while actually doing nothing.

The sex offender registry is nothing more than an online hit-list for vigilantes to use to target ex-sex offenders and their families for harassment, or worse, and it's been known to happen, and is increasing:

The registry doesn't protect anybody or prevent crime, and neither does the residency restrictions, which only force people into exile, homelessness and joblessness.

And if you really wanted to protect children, then, like the Adam Walsh CHILD PROTECTION and Safety Act suggests, you'd put all criminals who harm children on the registry, not just those that include sex of exposure of some form.

Why not have a registry for all criminals so we can all have the right to know where all the criminals live around us? If it saves one child, isn't it worth it?

Or are you just using ex-sex offenders as today's scapegoat, and to help yourselves look "tough" on crime and make money for those who exploit sex, children and criminal records for their own personal gain?

No comments :