Wednesday, November 28, 2012

AZ - Ruling OKs Arizona law on sex offender disclosures

Original Article

11/27/2012

By PAUL DAVENPORT

PHOENIX (AP) — An appeals court on Tuesday upheld an Arizona law that says home sellers can't be sued for failing to tell buyers that a sex offender lives nearby.

But the ruling from the Arizona Court of Appeals also said that lying about such an issue could constitute fraud.
- That is one reason not to ever check.

The case stems from a lawsuit filed by a couple who didn't know an offender lived next door to a Scottsdale home they bought for nearly $3.1 million in 2008.
- Aww, you should've checked before forking over the money.  This is your problem, not the real estate agents problem.

A three-judge panel's ruling said a Maricopa County Superior Court judge correctly dismissed most of the case because a 1995 Arizona law says sellers can't be sued for failing to disclose certain things, including that a sex offender lives nearby.

The law doesn't violate Arizona's state constitutional protection for the right to sue for damages because there was no right under pre-statehood legal doctrines requiring disclosures of property defects, the panel said.

But the ruling sent the case back to Superior Court to consider whether the sellers engaged in fraud.

It's up to a jury to decide whether statements by the sellers were false and whether the Lerners relied on them, the ruling said.

One of the panel's three judges dissented from that part of the ruling, saying that the fraud claim was also out of bounds because of the 1995 law.

The couple who sued, prominent personal-injury attorney Glen Lerner and his wife, said they should have been told about the offender living next door and that the sellers lied about why they wanted to move.

The Lerners' suit said the sellers falsely told them they wanted to move to be closer to friends when the actual motive for selling the home was the sex offender's proximity.


2 comments :

Realator said...

... a Scottsdale home they bought for nearly $3.1 million in 2008
... sold the home in 2011 for $1.4 million
... couple who sued, prominent personal-injury attorney Glen Lerner and his wife

'NUFF SAID!

Babachet said...

I am pretty sure the buyers could have looked into that themselves. That is a good excuse for buyers remorse like 3 years later.