- Search:
- Site
- ACLU
- Legislature
- Other
Search this site only:
Search all ACLU sites:
Search all state legislatures:
Search other related sites, or Google:
| Recommended: | State News: |
Support us today by using the donation links on the left
Showing posts with label SexualHarassment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SexualHarassment. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Feds Push Insane New Speech Codes!
Labels: FreedomOfSpeech , National , School , SexualHarassment , Video
Video Description:
"It is so broad that it turns every single student and every single faculty member on campus, at least arguably, into harassers," warns Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE).
He's talking about sweeping speech codes just imposed by the Departments of Justice and Education on virtually every college campus in the United States.
The new mandate was revealed in a letter from the DOJ and DOE to the University of Montana that states "sexual harassment should be more broadly defined as 'any unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature," including "verbal conduct." The new rules apply to all colleges and universities receiving any sort of federal money, including Pell grants, federally backed student loans, and more. The letter contends the conduct in question need not be offensive to an "objectively reasonable person of the same gender in the same situation." That means that there is effectively no check on what might count as harassment. Course materials, overheard comments, stupid jokes - it's all potentially actionable.
Lukianoff, the author of Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate, hopes that "this is the last straw that causes the universities themselves to start pushing back against this ridiculous overregulation."
Monday, March 4, 2013
CO - Bill O'Reilly - Jessica's Law Shot Down!
Labels: Colorado , Hypocrisy , MarkLunsford , RegSexHarassment , SexualHarassment , Video
Lets not forget that Bill O'Reilly had his own sexual harassment law suit in which he paid off the accuser (Court Documents). I wonder what he would say if he wasn't able to do that and he wound up on the sex offender registry, loses his job, and is seen as a monster?
Mark Lunsford mentions in the video that he was able to hear his daughter calling for someone to help her? How is that possible? Oh, and he's good at crying on queue!
And lets also not forget that when Jessica Lunsford went missing, it was mentioned that child porn was found on Mark Lunsfords computer, but nothing was done about it because they say "he had been through enough!"
And his own son (Joshua) was charged with molesting an underage child (Video Below) and got a slap on the wrist of 10 days in jail and doesn't have to register. Wow, money sure helps you get out of bad situations!
Mark Lunsford mentions in the video that he was able to hear his daughter calling for someone to help her? How is that possible? Oh, and he's good at crying on queue!
And lets also not forget that when Jessica Lunsford went missing, it was mentioned that child porn was found on Mark Lunsfords computer, but nothing was done about it because they say "he had been through enough!"
And his own son (Joshua) was charged with molesting an underage child (Video Below) and got a slap on the wrist of 10 days in jail and doesn't have to register. Wow, money sure helps you get out of bad situations!
Saturday, March 2, 2013
CT - Ernest Hewett stripped of title after lewd snake comment
Labels: Audio , Connecticut , CrimeGovernment , OffenderMale , SexualHarassment , Video
![]() |
| Ernest Hewett |
02/28/2013
By Ken Dixon
HARTFORD - A veteran House member from New London was stripped of his deputy speaker title this week after he made a lewd comment during a budget hearing.
Speaker of the House J. Brendan Sharkey said Thursday that Rep. Ernest Hewett made a remark perceived as sexually harassing during an exchange with a 17-year-old intern from the Connecticut Science Center.
After the teenage girl said that working at the science center helped her overcome a fear of snakes, Hewett allegedly made reference to a snake with him, under his desk top.
"The public needs to know this is an environment where they will be respected," Sharkey said. "That kind of language shouldn't be used in any public setting."
After hearing an audiotape of the incident, which occurred Feb. 21, Sharkey stripped Hewett of his deputy speaker title Wednesday. With the removal of the title goes $6,446 in extra pay above the rank-and-file rate of $28,000.
"After I first heard about it, I thought maybe in the broader sense maybe he was misunderstood and it may not be that big a deal," Sharkey said in an interview.
"But based on the audio, it's hard to interpret it that way. It's hard for anyone who heard the audio or was there to think it was anything other than a sexual innuendo."
"I guess the best word I can use to describe this is disturbing," Sharkey said.
Sharkey last week ordered sexual harassment training for all House Democrats who are not in their first or second term. In addition, he has invited women members of the 99-member majority caucus to meet with him and Hewett on Tuesday.
Hewett, a former mayor of New London who is in his fifth term in the House, said Thursday that he wanted to apologize to the young woman, whose identity he did not know.
"Secondly, I want to apologize to my colleagues for the statement I made," he said.
"I take full responsibility for my actions. In hindsight, I can really see how this can be misconstrued as something sexual," Hewett said.
Rep. Kim Fawcett, D-Fairfield, one of the lawmakers invited to the sit-down with Hewett next week, said lawmakers must find the 17-year-old intern.
"The apology needs to go to the 17-year-old girl who testified and the Connecticut Science Center who brought their intern to the Legislature, which submitted her to that kind of harassment," Fawcett said.
Saturday, December 22, 2012
PA - Former guard (Dale Guyer) sentenced in prison sex case
Labels: CrimePolice , Harassment , OffenderMale , Pennsylvania , SexualHarassment
Original Article
12/21/2012
By MICHAEL N. PRICE
WEST CHESTER — A now retired Chester County Prison correctional officer was sentenced to three years of probation Thursday for having a sexual relationship with a female inmate.
Retired Cpl. Dale Guyer, 49, of Coatesville, pleaded guilty to institutional sexual assault earlier this year for engaging in sexual intercourse with an inmate on Oct. 30 and 31 of 2010, according to court documents. Prosecutors said the offenses occurred inside the Prison Work Release Center in an area off limits to inmates.
Prosecutors, who requested a state prison sentence, argued that Guyer, abused his authority to coerce the victim into engaging in the relationship. Officials subsequently asked Guyer to retire from the prison,
“The sexual intercourse was consensual to the extent that a prison inmate can consent to sexual overtures from a corporal employed by the prison in which the inmate is incarcerated,” prosecutors argued in a sentencing memorandum filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas.
In those letters, the prosecution said Guyer threatened to spread compromising photographs of the victim to her friends and family. The harassment continued to the point that the victim eventually filed for a protection from abuse order against Guyer, court records said.
The relationship between Guyer and his victim continued, consensually, after she was released on parole in December 2010. In February 2011, the victim attempted to break off the relationship, but Guyer continued to contact her with threatening and harassing letters, according to the prosecution’s sentencing memorandum.
Prosecutors argued that though Guyer does not present a threat of physical harm to the public, his offenses could lead to a potential loss of faith in the system that exists to maintain order and justice.
12/21/2012
By MICHAEL N. PRICE
WEST CHESTER — A now retired Chester County Prison correctional officer was sentenced to three years of probation Thursday for having a sexual relationship with a female inmate.
Retired Cpl. Dale Guyer, 49, of Coatesville, pleaded guilty to institutional sexual assault earlier this year for engaging in sexual intercourse with an inmate on Oct. 30 and 31 of 2010, according to court documents. Prosecutors said the offenses occurred inside the Prison Work Release Center in an area off limits to inmates.
Prosecutors, who requested a state prison sentence, argued that Guyer, abused his authority to coerce the victim into engaging in the relationship. Officials subsequently asked Guyer to retire from the prison,
“The sexual intercourse was consensual to the extent that a prison inmate can consent to sexual overtures from a corporal employed by the prison in which the inmate is incarcerated,” prosecutors argued in a sentencing memorandum filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas.
In those letters, the prosecution said Guyer threatened to spread compromising photographs of the victim to her friends and family. The harassment continued to the point that the victim eventually filed for a protection from abuse order against Guyer, court records said.
The relationship between Guyer and his victim continued, consensually, after she was released on parole in December 2010. In February 2011, the victim attempted to break off the relationship, but Guyer continued to contact her with threatening and harassing letters, according to the prosecution’s sentencing memorandum.
Prosecutors argued that though Guyer does not present a threat of physical harm to the public, his offenses could lead to a potential loss of faith in the system that exists to maintain order and justice.
Wednesday, September 12, 2012
Britney Spears Settles Sexual Harassment Law Suit Filed By Former Body Guard
Labels: Celebrity , lawSuit , SexualHarassment
Original Article
09/12/2012
Britney Spears (Twitter) has struck a settlement with her former bodyguard. Fernando Flores claimed the American entertainer was a genital-flashing sexual harasser while he was working with the singer. According to court documents, Britney and Fernando Flores agreed to end their 2-year legal battle which started when Fernando Flores filed a lawsuit against the pop star.
In his suit, Flores had alleged Britney would intentionally drop her cigarette lighter in Fernando’s presence and then bend over to pick it up and “thereby exposed her uncovered genitals.” He also claimed Spears abused her children. She probably took her entertainer self too far.
Although Spears denies all of the allegations, TMZ reported that she coughed up a huge sum in settlement just to make the case go away. She’s got a lot to lose than to allow a suit of sexual harassment drag on in court. Besides winning multiple awards, Britney has a star on the Hollywood’s walk of fame. She has been involved in many philanthropic activities over the years. She’s presently a judge in Simon Cowell’s X-factor.
09/12/2012
Britney Spears (Twitter) has struck a settlement with her former bodyguard. Fernando Flores claimed the American entertainer was a genital-flashing sexual harasser while he was working with the singer. According to court documents, Britney and Fernando Flores agreed to end their 2-year legal battle which started when Fernando Flores filed a lawsuit against the pop star.
In his suit, Flores had alleged Britney would intentionally drop her cigarette lighter in Fernando’s presence and then bend over to pick it up and “thereby exposed her uncovered genitals.” He also claimed Spears abused her children. She probably took her entertainer self too far.
Although Spears denies all of the allegations, TMZ reported that she coughed up a huge sum in settlement just to make the case go away. She’s got a lot to lose than to allow a suit of sexual harassment drag on in court. Besides winning multiple awards, Britney has a star on the Hollywood’s walk of fame. She has been involved in many philanthropic activities over the years. She’s presently a judge in Simon Cowell’s X-factor.
Friday, May 4, 2012
CO - First-Grader Suspended for Singing 'I'm Sexy and I Know It'
Labels: 06YearsOld , Colorado , OffenderChild , SexualHarassment , Video , WTF
![]() |
| D'Avonte Meadows |
What has this world come to? This is just pure insanity! This is what happens when you have zero tolerance laws, so parents be forewarned, your child may be slapped with the sex offender label and ruined for life for simply saying "sex" to someone else!
05/04/2012
By Ashley Jennings
A Colorado elementary school student was suspended from school this week for singing a lyric from a popular LMFAO song, "I'm sexy and I know it."
Those six little words from the Los Angeles rap-influenced duo earned first-grader D'Avonte Meadows a three day dismissal from Sable Elementary in Aurora, Colo.
"I only just said the song," Meadows told Denver's ABC7 News. "I'm sexy and I know it."
School officials said D'Avonte was suspended for sexual harassment after he sang and the line to a female classmate who was standing in a lunch line. Unfortunately, it wasn't the first time he'd serenaded this girl with this particular lyric.
Aurora School District's Media Relations Specialist Paula Hans, said in a statement:
"Aurora Public Schools is committed to providing equitable learning for all students. We have policies and protocol in place to prevent any disruption to the learning environment. Due to privacy laws, we are unable to discuss appropriate disciplinary consequences about a specific student."
District policy, as outlined in the student handbook, states that sexual harassment "must have negative effects on the learning or work of others."
D'Avonte's mother, Stephanie Meadows, told ABC7 News that her son had had disciplinary problems before this week's infraction. Last month, she said, he was sent to the principal's office for singing the same song to the same girl.
This time, however, he was "shaking his booty" near the girl's face, Meadows told ABC7 News.
"I'm going to definitely have to sit with him and see if he understands exactly what the song means," Meadows told ABC7 News.
But Meadows still doesn't believe her son's recent actions justify suspension for sexual harassment.
"I could understand if he was fondling her, looking up her skirt, trying to look in her shirt. That, to me, is sexual harassment," Meadows told ABC7 News. "I'm just, I'm floored. They're going to look at him like he's a pervert. And it's like, that's not fair to him."
- Come on, he's a kid, and kids experiment with sex! If you remember your own childhood, and aren't afraid to say it, I'm sure you did similar things growing up! Even if he fondled her, he should be punished by his parents, not slammed with the sex offender label and ruined for life. But if he would've touched her, then I'm sure we'd see his face on the public shaming list.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
CA - Police chief (Lisa Solomon) accused of sexually assaulting her officers
Labels: California , CrimePolice , OffenderFemale , SexualAbuse , SexualHarassment
![]() |
| Lisa Solomon |
01/26/2012
By KAREN VELIE and DANIEL BLACKBURN
Law enforcement officers have names for the girls offering them sex on the beat: Badge Bunny. Holster Sniffer. Uniform Jumper. Handcuff Hugger. In Paso Robles, brethren in blue have one more: The Chief.
A flurry of complaints and mounting formal grievances alleging sexual misconduct, illegal management practices and retaliation have been lodged against Paso Robles’ first female chief of police, Lisa Solomon. Those known to have made accusations against the chief include five current and former police officers, as well as a growing record of non-sworn police department personnel.
The criticisms against Solomon include allegations of sexual assaults, many committed in the presence of others, repeated affairs with a list of subordinates, and bearing a child out of wedlock fathered by a former lieutenant in the department.
The city has retained the services of an outside investigator to look into the numerous complaints, officers say. Solomon, 43, is married to a San Luis Obispo police officer. She has not responded to detailed emails from CalCoastNews asking for comment.
Numerous officers and department staffers contend that crossing Solomon is dangerous. They say their boss threatens them with trumped-up criminal charges if they rebuff her advances or question her management practices.
After Officer T.J. McCall filed a grievance with the city claiming Solomon grabbed his penis while he sat in his car, city officials hired an outside investigator to interview officers about other allegations of unwanted sexual contact.
Former officer Dave Hernandez said he told the investigator of an instance in 2007 when Solomon also touched him inappropriately. In August, Hernandez and another officer in full uniform entered a saloon then called the Crooked Kilt, to do a bar check.
Solomon, who had been out on the dance floor, approached Hernandez in a room full of people and allegedly pushed the officer’s face into her breasts.
“She grabbed my head and pushed it between her breasts,” Hernandez said. “I was shocked.”
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Tuesday, December 20, 2011
MO - Missouri Boy, 14, With Down Syndrome Suspended for Allegedly Sexually Harassing Bus Aide
Labels: 14YearsOld , ChildAbuse , Missouri , OffenderChild , SexualHarassment , WTF
Original Article
This is what happens when you have zero tolerance laws, and the media continues to spread fear over the sex offender hysteria, innocent kids get ruined and potentially labeled "sex offenders!" Watch the video at the above link.
12/20/2011
By Joshua Rhett Miller
A 14-year-old Missouri boy with Down syndrome whose mother says he “gives people hugs all the time” has been suspended from middle school for allegedly sexually harassing a bus aide, a school official told FoxNews.com.
Desi Mayberry, Central R-III School District superintendent, told FoxNews.com that Aleczander Tate Scott, of Park Hills, Mo., grabbed an unidentified female bus aide while aboard a school bus last Wednesday and imitated a "sexual act" while on top of the woman, who is no longer considering pressing charges for sexual harassment.
"He grabbed her around her waist, like a bear hug, and then he gets on top of her and moves in a sexual motion, imitating a sexual act," Mayberry said.
The aide then "screamed for help," leading the school bus driver to separate the boy and the aide, Mayberry said. The incident led to a "short-term" suspension for Scott, according to Mayberry, who declined to indicate exactly how many days the boy was banned from school.
Mayberry said all of the district's buses have security cameras, but added that the boy's mother, Tonia Fujimoto, was not allowed to see the footage of the alleged incident despite her requests, citing district policy.
Fujimoto told FoxNews.com on Tuesday that her son has been out of school since last Thursday. His suspension will last through Jan. 5, she said. She vehemently disputed the allegations.
"The teachers and the administrators are not educated on children with developmental disabilities and they don't want to be educated on them," she said. "All they want to do is push them out of their doors."
Fujimoto said her son doesn't understand why he is being kept out of school.
"How can you put a sexual harassment charge against someone who doesn't understand sexuality? It doesn't really take my faith of people away, but it reminds me of the ignorance in this world," she said.
Fujimoto said she has since requested that Aleczander be transferred to another nearby school district, a request she said administrators have approved pending his acceptance. She has consulted an attorney regarding possible juvenile charges to be filed against her son, she said.
"I still want to see the tape, but I'm more worried about what charges might be brought against him," she said. "And how do you explain to him that he can't go to school?"
This is what happens when you have zero tolerance laws, and the media continues to spread fear over the sex offender hysteria, innocent kids get ruined and potentially labeled "sex offenders!" Watch the video at the above link.
12/20/2011
By Joshua Rhett Miller
A 14-year-old Missouri boy with Down syndrome whose mother says he “gives people hugs all the time” has been suspended from middle school for allegedly sexually harassing a bus aide, a school official told FoxNews.com.
Desi Mayberry, Central R-III School District superintendent, told FoxNews.com that Aleczander Tate Scott, of Park Hills, Mo., grabbed an unidentified female bus aide while aboard a school bus last Wednesday and imitated a "sexual act" while on top of the woman, who is no longer considering pressing charges for sexual harassment.
"He grabbed her around her waist, like a bear hug, and then he gets on top of her and moves in a sexual motion, imitating a sexual act," Mayberry said.
The aide then "screamed for help," leading the school bus driver to separate the boy and the aide, Mayberry said. The incident led to a "short-term" suspension for Scott, according to Mayberry, who declined to indicate exactly how many days the boy was banned from school.
Mayberry said all of the district's buses have security cameras, but added that the boy's mother, Tonia Fujimoto, was not allowed to see the footage of the alleged incident despite her requests, citing district policy.
Fujimoto told FoxNews.com on Tuesday that her son has been out of school since last Thursday. His suspension will last through Jan. 5, she said. She vehemently disputed the allegations.
"The teachers and the administrators are not educated on children with developmental disabilities and they don't want to be educated on them," she said. "All they want to do is push them out of their doors."
Fujimoto said her son doesn't understand why he is being kept out of school.
"How can you put a sexual harassment charge against someone who doesn't understand sexuality? It doesn't really take my faith of people away, but it reminds me of the ignorance in this world," she said.
Fujimoto said she has since requested that Aleczander be transferred to another nearby school district, a request she said administrators have approved pending his acceptance. She has consulted an attorney regarding possible juvenile charges to be filed against her son, she said.
"I still want to see the tape, but I'm more worried about what charges might be brought against him," she said. "And how do you explain to him that he can't go to school?"
Monday, December 5, 2011
NC - Boy, 9, Suspended from School for Sexual Harassment After Calling Teacher 'Cute'
Labels: 07YearsOld , 09YearsOld , NorthCarolina , OffenderChild , OffenderMale , SexualHarassment
Original Article
12/04/2011
A 9-year-old boy North Carolina boy was suspended for calling a teacher “cute,” WSOCTV.com reports.
The boy’s mother, Chiquita Lockett, said the principal of Brookside Elementary in Gastonia called her after the incident to say the comment was a form of “sexual harassment.”
"It's not like he went up to the woman and tried to grab her or touch her in a sexual way," Lockett said. "So why would he be suspended for two days?”
According to the station, a district spokeswoman said she could not go into detail, but said the boy was suspended for "inappropriate behavior" after making "inappropriate statements."
- So I guess anybody on the street who tells a man or woman they are cute, will wind up in court and possibly on the sex offender registry next.
The district's Code of Conduct doesn't list "inappropriate behavior," but says "disruption of school" is punishable by five days of out-of-school suspension.
The news of the North Carolina boy’s suspension comes as a Massachusetts elementary school is investigating a first-grader for sexual harassment after the boy struck another boy his age in the groin.
The mother of the accused 7-year-old tells the Boston Globe that her son was fending off another child, who had choked him in an altercation on the school bus on Nov. 22.
“I think my kid was right to fight back,’’ said the mother, Tasha Lynch, 30. “He wasn’t doing anything except protecting himself.’’
Lynch says her son has been afraid to return to Tynan Elementary School in South Boston since the fight, according to the paper.
Matthew Wilder, spokesman for the Boston public schools, declined to comment on the incident or why it has been classified as a possible case of sexual harassment. He said officials do not discuss confidential student information.
12/04/2011
A 9-year-old boy North Carolina boy was suspended for calling a teacher “cute,” WSOCTV.com reports.
The boy’s mother, Chiquita Lockett, said the principal of Brookside Elementary in Gastonia called her after the incident to say the comment was a form of “sexual harassment.”
"It's not like he went up to the woman and tried to grab her or touch her in a sexual way," Lockett said. "So why would he be suspended for two days?”
According to the station, a district spokeswoman said she could not go into detail, but said the boy was suspended for "inappropriate behavior" after making "inappropriate statements."
- So I guess anybody on the street who tells a man or woman they are cute, will wind up in court and possibly on the sex offender registry next.
The district's Code of Conduct doesn't list "inappropriate behavior," but says "disruption of school" is punishable by five days of out-of-school suspension.
The news of the North Carolina boy’s suspension comes as a Massachusetts elementary school is investigating a first-grader for sexual harassment after the boy struck another boy his age in the groin.
The mother of the accused 7-year-old tells the Boston Globe that her son was fending off another child, who had choked him in an altercation on the school bus on Nov. 22.
“I think my kid was right to fight back,’’ said the mother, Tasha Lynch, 30. “He wasn’t doing anything except protecting himself.’’
Lynch says her son has been afraid to return to Tynan Elementary School in South Boston since the fight, according to the paper.
Matthew Wilder, spokesman for the Boston public schools, declined to comment on the incident or why it has been classified as a possible case of sexual harassment. He said officials do not discuss confidential student information.
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
National Study Finds Widespread Sexual Harassment of Students in Grades 7 to 12
Labels: Harassment , National , SexualHarassment , Study
Original Article
I wonder if all these kids will be ruined for life and wind up on the sex offender registry? Harassment and bullying has been around since the dawn of time, and I seriously doubt it will go away anytime soon.
11/07/2011
By JENNY ANDERSON
Nearly half of 7th to 12th graders experienced sexual harassment in the last school year, according to a study scheduled for release on Monday, with 87 percent of those who have been harassed reporting negative effects such as absenteeism, poor sleep and stomachaches.
On its survey of a nationally representative group of 1,965 students, the American Association of University Women, a nonprofit research organization, defined harassment as “unwelcome sexual behavior that takes place in person or electronically.” Over all, girls reported being harassed more than boys — 56 percent compared with 40 percent — though it was evenly divided during middle school. Boys were more likely to be the harassers, according to the study, and children from lower-income families reported more severe effects.
“It’s pervasive, and almost a normal part of the school day,” said Catherine Hill, the director of research at the association and one of the authors of the report.
Over all, 48 percent of students surveyed said they were harassed during the 2010-11 school year. Forty-four percent of students said they were harassed “in person” — being subjected to unwelcome comments or jokes, inappropriate touching or sexual intimidation — and 30 percent reported online harassment, like receiving unwelcome comments, jokes or pictures through texts, e-mail, Facebook and other tools, or having sexual rumors, information or pictures spread about them.
Whatever the medium, more girls were victims: 52 percent of girls said they had been harassed in person, and 36 percent online, compared with 35 percent of boys who were harassed in person and 24 percent online.
“I was called a whore because I have many friends that are boys,” one ninth-grade girl was quoted as saying. An eighth-grade boy, meanwhile, reported, “They spread rumors I was gay because I played on the basketball team.”
The study asked students to reflect on the 2010-11 school year in an attempt to capture the prevalence of sexual harassment, the effects it has on the harassed and the reasons the harassers engage in the behavior. It also questioned students about preventive measures. Coming amid increased attention to bullying and cyber-bullying, the report aimed to highlight the damaging effects of inappropriate sexual comments, online rumors or lurid Facebook posts.
“Bullying is getting a lot of attention,” said Holly Kearl, an author of the report and program manager of the university association’s Advocacy Fund. “We don’t want schools to forget about sexual harassment” and not talk about it, she said. Ms. Kearl said some schools that talk to students about sexual harassment and how to respond to it have been successful in reducing it. “We want to encourage schools to know what Title IX is,” she said, referring to the federal law that prohibits discrimination based on gender in schools, “to have a coordinator and to publicize it.”
The report documents many forms of harassment. The most common was unwelcome sexual comments, gestures or jokes, which was experienced by 46 percent of girls and 22 percent of boys. Separately, 13 percent of girls reported being touched in an unwelcome way, compared with 3 percent of boys; 3.5 percent of girls said they were forced to do something sexual, as did 0.2 percent of boys. About 18 percent of both boys and girls reported being called gay or lesbian in a negative way.
In the survey, students were asked to identify what had the worst effect on them. For boys, it was being called gay — “Everyone was saying I was gay, and I felt the need to have to run away and hide,” a ninth-grader said. For girls, the leading problem was having someone make “unwelcome sexual comments, jokes or gestures to or about you.”
Girls also reported more negative consequences: 37 percent said they did not want to go to school after being harassed, versus 25 percent of boys. Twenty-two percent of girls who were harassed said they had trouble sleeping, compared with 14 percent of boys; 37 percent of girls felt sick to their stomach, versus 21 percent of boys.
Those students who experienced both online and in-person harassment experienced the worst effects: 46 percent said they did not want to go to school, 44 percent felt sick to their stomachs and 43 percent found it hard to study.
Half of those who were harassed said they did nothing about it; 9 percent said they reported the incident to an adult at school; and 27 percent of students (32 percent of girls and 20 percent of boys) said they talked about it with a family member.
When asked what types of students were most at risk of harassment, students said “good-looking boys” were the safest, with pretty girls, ugly girls and feminine boys the likely targets. Girls whose bodies are most developed are the most at-risk, students said.
“This is an issue that’s especially complex for girls, though it affects all students,” Ms. Hill said. “Boys are targets, and girls can be harassers.”
I wonder if all these kids will be ruined for life and wind up on the sex offender registry? Harassment and bullying has been around since the dawn of time, and I seriously doubt it will go away anytime soon.
11/07/2011
By JENNY ANDERSON
Nearly half of 7th to 12th graders experienced sexual harassment in the last school year, according to a study scheduled for release on Monday, with 87 percent of those who have been harassed reporting negative effects such as absenteeism, poor sleep and stomachaches.
On its survey of a nationally representative group of 1,965 students, the American Association of University Women, a nonprofit research organization, defined harassment as “unwelcome sexual behavior that takes place in person or electronically.” Over all, girls reported being harassed more than boys — 56 percent compared with 40 percent — though it was evenly divided during middle school. Boys were more likely to be the harassers, according to the study, and children from lower-income families reported more severe effects.
“It’s pervasive, and almost a normal part of the school day,” said Catherine Hill, the director of research at the association and one of the authors of the report.
Over all, 48 percent of students surveyed said they were harassed during the 2010-11 school year. Forty-four percent of students said they were harassed “in person” — being subjected to unwelcome comments or jokes, inappropriate touching or sexual intimidation — and 30 percent reported online harassment, like receiving unwelcome comments, jokes or pictures through texts, e-mail, Facebook and other tools, or having sexual rumors, information or pictures spread about them.
Whatever the medium, more girls were victims: 52 percent of girls said they had been harassed in person, and 36 percent online, compared with 35 percent of boys who were harassed in person and 24 percent online.
“I was called a whore because I have many friends that are boys,” one ninth-grade girl was quoted as saying. An eighth-grade boy, meanwhile, reported, “They spread rumors I was gay because I played on the basketball team.”
The study asked students to reflect on the 2010-11 school year in an attempt to capture the prevalence of sexual harassment, the effects it has on the harassed and the reasons the harassers engage in the behavior. It also questioned students about preventive measures. Coming amid increased attention to bullying and cyber-bullying, the report aimed to highlight the damaging effects of inappropriate sexual comments, online rumors or lurid Facebook posts.
“Bullying is getting a lot of attention,” said Holly Kearl, an author of the report and program manager of the university association’s Advocacy Fund. “We don’t want schools to forget about sexual harassment” and not talk about it, she said. Ms. Kearl said some schools that talk to students about sexual harassment and how to respond to it have been successful in reducing it. “We want to encourage schools to know what Title IX is,” she said, referring to the federal law that prohibits discrimination based on gender in schools, “to have a coordinator and to publicize it.”
The report documents many forms of harassment. The most common was unwelcome sexual comments, gestures or jokes, which was experienced by 46 percent of girls and 22 percent of boys. Separately, 13 percent of girls reported being touched in an unwelcome way, compared with 3 percent of boys; 3.5 percent of girls said they were forced to do something sexual, as did 0.2 percent of boys. About 18 percent of both boys and girls reported being called gay or lesbian in a negative way.
In the survey, students were asked to identify what had the worst effect on them. For boys, it was being called gay — “Everyone was saying I was gay, and I felt the need to have to run away and hide,” a ninth-grader said. For girls, the leading problem was having someone make “unwelcome sexual comments, jokes or gestures to or about you.”
Girls also reported more negative consequences: 37 percent said they did not want to go to school after being harassed, versus 25 percent of boys. Twenty-two percent of girls who were harassed said they had trouble sleeping, compared with 14 percent of boys; 37 percent of girls felt sick to their stomach, versus 21 percent of boys.
Those students who experienced both online and in-person harassment experienced the worst effects: 46 percent said they did not want to go to school, 44 percent felt sick to their stomachs and 43 percent found it hard to study.
Half of those who were harassed said they did nothing about it; 9 percent said they reported the incident to an adult at school; and 27 percent of students (32 percent of girls and 20 percent of boys) said they talked about it with a family member.
When asked what types of students were most at risk of harassment, students said “good-looking boys” were the safest, with pretty girls, ugly girls and feminine boys the likely targets. Girls whose bodies are most developed are the most at-risk, students said.
“This is an issue that’s especially complex for girls, though it affects all students,” Ms. Hill said. “Boys are targets, and girls can be harassers.”
Sunday, July 31, 2011
FL - Rep. Alcee Hastings investigated for sexual harassment
Labels: CrimeGovernment , Florida , OffenderMale , SexualHarassment
![]() |
| Rep. Alcee Hastings |
07/22/2011
By Rachel Rose Hartman
Hours after Rep. Anthony Weiner's resignation became official, a sexual harassment case involving Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-Fla.) resurfaced.
Gary Fields and Brody Mullins report for the Wall Street Journal that the independent Office of Congressional Ethics is now investigating a claim that Hastings sexually harassed a woman working on his staff.
Fields and Mullins write that the Office investigation was opened after conservative group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit in March as the legal counsel for Republican staffer Winsome Packer. Packer, who served on the U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe--a group headed by the congressman--alleges that Hastings retaliated when Packer attempted to report the harassment, according to the paper. Judicial Watch has targeted Hastings in the past.
Accusations include "unwelcome sexual advances," and "unwelcome touching," according to March reports of the lawsuit. Packer had accused Hastings of offering her invitations to his hotel room, asking inappropriate questions in public including "What kind of underwear are you wearing?" as well as pressuring her to give him gifts and donate to his re-election campaign.
Hastings, a 74-year-old 10-term lawmaker, strongly denies all charges. He stated back in March when reports of the lawsuit became public that he "never sexually harassed anyone."
"That is a certainty: In a race with a lie, the truth always wins. And when the truth comes to light and the personal agendas of my accusers are exposed, I will be vindicated."
- This is not true. If the truth always won, then these draconian sex offender laws would not be laws.
Democrats this week had hoped that Weiner's resignation, effective Tuesday, would finally end talk of sex scandals concerning their members and shift focus back to legislating, as well as campaign-based efforts to attack Republicans on Medicare and other issues. The Ethics Committee announced prior to Weiner's resignation that it had opened an investigation into Weiner's risque online communications.
The Office of Congressional Ethics is not the House Ethics Committee-- which investigates House members and metes out punishments (as it did for New York Democrat Charlie Rangel last winter). The Office was established by then- Speaker Nancy Pelosi in 2008 to better connect the House Ethics Committee with the public and to process public complaints. The Office's investigation is a precursor to a formal Ethics Committee investigation, which would proceed largely on the recommendation of the Office.
The Wall Street Journal notes that even if the Office passes on recommending an Committee investigation, "its findings must be made public."
The House Ethics process has drawn heavy criticism for what detractors say is a persistent failure to effectively punish and police its members.
Monday, September 27, 2010
WI - Wisconsin DA. (Kenneth Kratz) Accused of Sexual Harassment to Resign, Lawyer Says
Labels: OffenderMale , Sexting , SexualHarassment , Video , Wisconsin
Original Article
See Also
09/27/2010
By LEE FERRAN, JIM VOJTECH and STEVEN PORTNOY
Calumet County, Wis., DA. Kenneth Kratz Accused of Using Office to Manipulate Relationships With Women
The Wisconsin district attorney accused of "sexting" women involved in cases he was prosecuting, including one alleged domestic violence victim, will resign from office, the attorney's lawyer said today.
Calumet Country DA Ken Kratz had fought pressure to resign for two weeks since the allegations were first made public but decided to step down before the Oct. 8 court hearing that could have forced his removal, Kratz's attorney Robert Craanen told reporters after he met with his client at a Wisconsin courthouse, according to The Associated Press.
The first of what would become five accusations against Kratz came to light Sept. 15 when the AP published several text messages from Kratz to Stephanie Van Groll, the victim in a domestic violence case Kratz was trying in the fall of 2009. Van Groll, 26, went to police after she received the texts from Kratz, messages in which he called her a "tall, young, hot nymph" and asked whether she is "the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA."
Kratz, 50, admitted to texting Van Groll and offered his "sincere and heartfelt apology" at a news conference days after the news broke. He also said he had already begun psychotherapy to address the "selfishness" and "arrogance" that led to him contact Van Groll.
"My behavior was inappropriate," Kratz said. "I'm embarrassed and ashamed for the choices that I made, and the fault was mine alone."
Kratz's office announced last week he'd gone on leave. Craanen did not immediately return requests for comment on the report.
A second woman came forward early last week to claim similar harassment, saying Kratz had offered to let her attend an autopsy. In an e-mail written to Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle, the woman claimed to have met Kratz online in December 2009. On a dinner date, the woman alleged, Kratz divulged to her the details of an ongoing murder investigation in which a woman was believed to have been killed by her boyfriend.
A few days later, a third woman came forward to claim she, too, had been harassed via text message by Kratz.
Maria Ruskiewicz told the AP she met Kratz in 2008 about a previous drug case. Ruskiewicz said that after she left the meeting, she received several texts from Kratz that escalated into sexual harassment.
"The reason ... I'm coming forward is he abuses his power, not only with women, but with women in certain situations who are extremely vulnerable to his authority," Ruskiewicz, 31, an Appleton, Wis., native, told The Associated Press last week.
In the week that followed, another two women leveled similar accusations, ABC New's Wisconsin affiliate WBAY reported.
Craanen denied to the AP the second woman's claim about the autopsy date.
Doyle, the governor, a former district attorney and state attorney general, began proceedings last week to investigate the official complaints, a process that could have concluded with Kratz's forcible removal.
"My reaction was the same as everyone who has worked on these issues over the years, that this is just a terrible violation of trust," he said on "GMA" last week.
The investigation into Kratz's alleged harassment will continue whether he is in office, one investigator told WBAY.
"The announcement that Ken Kratz will resign will have no bearing on their investigation," Keith Sellen, director of Wisconsin's Office of Lawyer Regulation, said. "It will continue to its conclusion, as announced last week, and regardless of whether or not he resigns or surrenders his law license."
See Also
09/27/2010
By LEE FERRAN, JIM VOJTECH and STEVEN PORTNOY
Calumet County, Wis., DA. Kenneth Kratz Accused of Using Office to Manipulate Relationships With Women
The Wisconsin district attorney accused of "sexting" women involved in cases he was prosecuting, including one alleged domestic violence victim, will resign from office, the attorney's lawyer said today.
Calumet Country DA Ken Kratz had fought pressure to resign for two weeks since the allegations were first made public but decided to step down before the Oct. 8 court hearing that could have forced his removal, Kratz's attorney Robert Craanen told reporters after he met with his client at a Wisconsin courthouse, according to The Associated Press.
The first of what would become five accusations against Kratz came to light Sept. 15 when the AP published several text messages from Kratz to Stephanie Van Groll, the victim in a domestic violence case Kratz was trying in the fall of 2009. Van Groll, 26, went to police after she received the texts from Kratz, messages in which he called her a "tall, young, hot nymph" and asked whether she is "the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA."
Kratz, 50, admitted to texting Van Groll and offered his "sincere and heartfelt apology" at a news conference days after the news broke. He also said he had already begun psychotherapy to address the "selfishness" and "arrogance" that led to him contact Van Groll.
"My behavior was inappropriate," Kratz said. "I'm embarrassed and ashamed for the choices that I made, and the fault was mine alone."
Kratz's office announced last week he'd gone on leave. Craanen did not immediately return requests for comment on the report.
A second woman came forward early last week to claim similar harassment, saying Kratz had offered to let her attend an autopsy. In an e-mail written to Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle, the woman claimed to have met Kratz online in December 2009. On a dinner date, the woman alleged, Kratz divulged to her the details of an ongoing murder investigation in which a woman was believed to have been killed by her boyfriend.
A few days later, a third woman came forward to claim she, too, had been harassed via text message by Kratz.
Maria Ruskiewicz told the AP she met Kratz in 2008 about a previous drug case. Ruskiewicz said that after she left the meeting, she received several texts from Kratz that escalated into sexual harassment.
"The reason ... I'm coming forward is he abuses his power, not only with women, but with women in certain situations who are extremely vulnerable to his authority," Ruskiewicz, 31, an Appleton, Wis., native, told The Associated Press last week.
In the week that followed, another two women leveled similar accusations, ABC New's Wisconsin affiliate WBAY reported.
Craanen denied to the AP the second woman's claim about the autopsy date.
Doyle, the governor, a former district attorney and state attorney general, began proceedings last week to investigate the official complaints, a process that could have concluded with Kratz's forcible removal.
"My reaction was the same as everyone who has worked on these issues over the years, that this is just a terrible violation of trust," he said on "GMA" last week.
The investigation into Kratz's alleged harassment will continue whether he is in office, one investigator told WBAY.
"The announcement that Ken Kratz will resign will have no bearing on their investigation," Keith Sellen, director of Wisconsin's Office of Lawyer Regulation, said. "It will continue to its conclusion, as announced last week, and regardless of whether or not he resigns or surrenders his law license."
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
WI - Third Woman Speaks Out About DA's (Ken Kratz) 'Sexting' Harassment
Labels: CrimeLawyer , OffenderMale , Sexting , SexualHarassment , Video , Wisconsin
Original Article
See Also
These comments are in response to the video. Come on ABC, the man hasn't lost his job yet, because he is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY! Why should someone accused of something be ruined when it may not be true? If he is found guilty, then yes, he should lose his job and be in jail and/or prison, but until then, he is presumed innocent.
09/22/2010
By LEE FERRAN, JIM VOJTECH and STEVEN PORTNOY
Three Women Accuse Ken Kratz, DA of Calumet County, Wis., of Sexually Explicit Texting
The third woman to come forward to accuse a Wisconsin district attorney of sexual harassment via text messaging said today that she is not likely the last.
"A man like this has got a pattern of abusive behavior of his power," Maria Ruskiewicz, 31, told "Good Morning America" in a live interview. "There is no way we're the only three women out there."
Ruskiewicz claims that Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz began sending her sexually explicit texts in 2008 after the two met about clearing up an old drug charge against her.
"He would say things like, 'I'm in Traverse City with my family. ... Can we meet in between the sheets?'" Ruskiewicz said in describing the texts. She said she did not report the inappropriate contact because she believed her case depended on Kratz's support.
"I was freaked out. I was scared for my future, scared to be stripped of the years I've worked so hard to get this clemency," she said. "I've just received clemency. That's why I'm coming forward."
Ruskiewicz is the third woman to report such sexually charged texting. The first accusation against Kratz came to light last week when The Associated Press published several text messages from Kratz to Stephanie Van Groll, the victim in a domestic violence case Kratz was trying in the fall of 2009. Van Groll, 26, reportedly received texts from Kratz in which he called her a "tall, young, hot nymph" and asked whether she is "the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA."
- Wonder what his wife thinks about this?
Kratz admitted to texting Van Groll and offered his "sincere and heartfelt apology" at a news conference Friday. He also said he had already begun psychotherapy to address the "selfishness" and "arrogance" that led to him contact Van Groll.
- Typical of most in power. When caught, seek help quickly to make yourself look better. Remember, Mark Foley did this as well, and he's still a free man!
"My behavior was inappropriate," Kratz said. "I'm embarrassed and ashamed for the choices that I made, and the fault was mine alone."
- So you are admitting guilt, and if all this is true, it's sexual harassment, which is a crime!
Kratz's office announced Monday he'd gone on leave.
Adding to Kratz's woes, a second woman came forward Monday to claim similar harassment, saying Kratz had offered to let her attend an autopsy. In an e-mail written to Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle last week, the woman claimed to have met Kratz online in December 2009. On a dinner date, the woman said Kratz divulged to her the details of an ongoing murder investigation in which a woman was believed to have been killed by her boyfriend.
Kratz's recently hired attorney, Robert J. Craanen, did not return calls for comment on the most recent accusation, but Craanen did deny to the AP the second woman's claim about the autopsy date and said he knew nothing of Ruskiewicz's claims.
- What kind of person would want to see an autopsy on a "date?"
See Also
These comments are in response to the video. Come on ABC, the man hasn't lost his job yet, because he is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY! Why should someone accused of something be ruined when it may not be true? If he is found guilty, then yes, he should lose his job and be in jail and/or prison, but until then, he is presumed innocent.
09/22/2010
By LEE FERRAN, JIM VOJTECH and STEVEN PORTNOY
Three Women Accuse Ken Kratz, DA of Calumet County, Wis., of Sexually Explicit Texting
The third woman to come forward to accuse a Wisconsin district attorney of sexual harassment via text messaging said today that she is not likely the last.
"A man like this has got a pattern of abusive behavior of his power," Maria Ruskiewicz, 31, told "Good Morning America" in a live interview. "There is no way we're the only three women out there."
Ruskiewicz claims that Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz began sending her sexually explicit texts in 2008 after the two met about clearing up an old drug charge against her.
"He would say things like, 'I'm in Traverse City with my family. ... Can we meet in between the sheets?'" Ruskiewicz said in describing the texts. She said she did not report the inappropriate contact because she believed her case depended on Kratz's support.
"I was freaked out. I was scared for my future, scared to be stripped of the years I've worked so hard to get this clemency," she said. "I've just received clemency. That's why I'm coming forward."
Ruskiewicz is the third woman to report such sexually charged texting. The first accusation against Kratz came to light last week when The Associated Press published several text messages from Kratz to Stephanie Van Groll, the victim in a domestic violence case Kratz was trying in the fall of 2009. Van Groll, 26, reportedly received texts from Kratz in which he called her a "tall, young, hot nymph" and asked whether she is "the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA."
- Wonder what his wife thinks about this?
Kratz admitted to texting Van Groll and offered his "sincere and heartfelt apology" at a news conference Friday. He also said he had already begun psychotherapy to address the "selfishness" and "arrogance" that led to him contact Van Groll.
- Typical of most in power. When caught, seek help quickly to make yourself look better. Remember, Mark Foley did this as well, and he's still a free man!
"My behavior was inappropriate," Kratz said. "I'm embarrassed and ashamed for the choices that I made, and the fault was mine alone."
- So you are admitting guilt, and if all this is true, it's sexual harassment, which is a crime!
Kratz's office announced Monday he'd gone on leave.
Adding to Kratz's woes, a second woman came forward Monday to claim similar harassment, saying Kratz had offered to let her attend an autopsy. In an e-mail written to Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle last week, the woman claimed to have met Kratz online in December 2009. On a dinner date, the woman said Kratz divulged to her the details of an ongoing murder investigation in which a woman was believed to have been killed by her boyfriend.
Kratz's recently hired attorney, Robert J. Craanen, did not return calls for comment on the most recent accusation, but Craanen did deny to the AP the second woman's claim about the autopsy date and said he knew nothing of Ruskiewicz's claims.
- What kind of person would want to see an autopsy on a "date?"
Thursday, September 16, 2010
WI - Prosecutor (Kenneth Kratz) who 'sexted' victim won't resign
Labels: CrimeLawyer , OffenderMale , Sexting , SexualHarassment , Video , Wisconsin
Original Article
Isn't sexual harassment a crime?
09/16/2010
By RYAN J. FOLEY
CHILTON - A Wisconsin prosecutor known for two decades as an advocate for crime victims says he is embarrassed about sending sexually suggestive text messages to a choking victim while he was prosecuting her ex-boyfriend, but will remain in office.
Calumet County District Attorney Kenneth Kratz issued that statement Wednesday after The Associated Press reported on the 30 texts he sent to a 26-year-old woman who had complained to police last year. A police report shows he repeatedly sent [name withheld] text messages in October 2009 trying to spark an affair.
"Are you the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA ... the riskier the better?" Kratz, 50, wrote in one message. In another, he wrote: "I would not expect you to be the other woman. I would want you to be so hot and treat me so well that you'd be THE woman! R U that good?"
Kratz was prosecuting [name withheld]'s ex-boyfriend on charges he nearly choked her to death last year. He also was veteran chair of the Wisconsin Crime Victims' Rights Board, a quasi-judicial agency that can reprimand judges, prosecutors and police officers who mistreat crime victims.
In a combative interview in his office, Kratz did not deny sending the messages and expressed concern their publication would unfairly embarrass him personally and professionally. He said the Office of Lawyer Regulation found in March he did not violate any rules governing attorney misconduct, but refused to provide a copy of what he said was the report clearing him. That office cannot comment on investigations.
"This is a non-news story," Kratz shouted. But he added, "I'm worried about it because of my reputational interests."
Hours later, Kratz issued a statement acknowledging sending the messages and saying he "was embarrassed at this lapse of judgment."
"I have never been the subject of attorney discipline during my entire 25-year career, and until today, have enjoyed a spotless reputation as a vigorous advocate for crime victims," he said.
[name withheld] told police in Kaukauna, Wis., where she lived, that she felt pressured to have a relationship with Kratz or he would drop charges against her ex-boyfriend.
Kratz said he "immediately removed himself" from the prosecution after learning about the complaint, and the state Department of Justice took over. Kratz said he resigned from the crime victims board, which he helped create, after more than a decade as chair as a "self-imposed sanction." He and his wife filed for divorce last December.
Kratz has served in Chilton since 1992 and earns a $105,000 salary. Kratz, a Republican, isn't up for re-election until November 2012.
"Nothing really happened to him and I had three days of hell," [name withheld] said in a phone interview with the AP. "They gave him a slap on the wrist and told him not to do it again. If it was anybody else that did something like this, they'd lose their job."
Domestic violence experts called Kratz's text messages disturbing and unethical for several reasons, including the power differential between a prosecutor and a younger abuse victim.
"If what's being alleged is true, it's sad a prosecutor would use the same sort of power and control over a woman who has already experienced that in her personal life," said Patti Seger, executive director of the Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
Kratz, who flirted with a run for Congress in 2008, may be best known for prosecuting Steven Avery in the 2005 killing of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer. The case received national attention because Avery had spent 18 years behind bars for a rape he did not commit in a separate case before DNA evidence implicated someone else.
A spokeswoman said the victims' rights board has not received a complaint about Kratz and is not investigating his conduct toward [name withheld].
Kratz cited an undisclosed conflict of interest in stepping away from the abuse case after [name withheld] reported the text messages, court records show. A special prosecutor won a conviction on one felony count of strangulation against the man, [name withheld].
[name withheld] said Kratz sent the first text minutes after she left his office, where he had interviewed her about the case.
He said it was nice talking and "you have such potential," signing the message "KEN (your favorite DA)." Twenty minutes later, he added, "I wish you weren't one of this office's clients. You'd be a cool person to know!" But he quickly tried to start a relationship and told her to keep quiet about the texts.
[name withheld] at first was polite, saying Kratz was "a nice person" and thanking him for praise. By the second day, she responded with answers such as "dono" or "no." Kratz questioned whether her "low self-esteem" was to blame for the lack of interest.
"I'm serious! I'm the atty. I have the $350,000 house. I have the 6-figure career. You may be the tall, young, hot nymph, but I am the prize!" he texted.
Kratz told her the relationship would unfold slow enough for "Shannon's case to get done." ''Remember it would have to be special enough to risk all," he wrote.
[name withheld] said she went to police after the messages started becoming "kind of vulgar." She provided copies of 30 messages and her responses, which the department released in response to an AP request.
The department referred the complaint to the state Division of Criminal Investigation. [name withheld], a college student and part-time preschool teacher who has moved to Merrill, said she has been told Kratz won't be charged because "they didn't think he did anything criminally wrong."

Isn't sexual harassment a crime?
09/16/2010
By RYAN J. FOLEY
CHILTON - A Wisconsin prosecutor known for two decades as an advocate for crime victims says he is embarrassed about sending sexually suggestive text messages to a choking victim while he was prosecuting her ex-boyfriend, but will remain in office.
Calumet County District Attorney Kenneth Kratz issued that statement Wednesday after The Associated Press reported on the 30 texts he sent to a 26-year-old woman who had complained to police last year. A police report shows he repeatedly sent [name withheld] text messages in October 2009 trying to spark an affair.
"Are you the kind of girl that likes secret contact with an older married elected DA ... the riskier the better?" Kratz, 50, wrote in one message. In another, he wrote: "I would not expect you to be the other woman. I would want you to be so hot and treat me so well that you'd be THE woman! R U that good?"
Kratz was prosecuting [name withheld]'s ex-boyfriend on charges he nearly choked her to death last year. He also was veteran chair of the Wisconsin Crime Victims' Rights Board, a quasi-judicial agency that can reprimand judges, prosecutors and police officers who mistreat crime victims.
In a combative interview in his office, Kratz did not deny sending the messages and expressed concern their publication would unfairly embarrass him personally and professionally. He said the Office of Lawyer Regulation found in March he did not violate any rules governing attorney misconduct, but refused to provide a copy of what he said was the report clearing him. That office cannot comment on investigations.
"This is a non-news story," Kratz shouted. But he added, "I'm worried about it because of my reputational interests."
Hours later, Kratz issued a statement acknowledging sending the messages and saying he "was embarrassed at this lapse of judgment."
"I have never been the subject of attorney discipline during my entire 25-year career, and until today, have enjoyed a spotless reputation as a vigorous advocate for crime victims," he said.
[name withheld] told police in Kaukauna, Wis., where she lived, that she felt pressured to have a relationship with Kratz or he would drop charges against her ex-boyfriend.
Kratz said he "immediately removed himself" from the prosecution after learning about the complaint, and the state Department of Justice took over. Kratz said he resigned from the crime victims board, which he helped create, after more than a decade as chair as a "self-imposed sanction." He and his wife filed for divorce last December.
Kratz has served in Chilton since 1992 and earns a $105,000 salary. Kratz, a Republican, isn't up for re-election until November 2012.
"Nothing really happened to him and I had three days of hell," [name withheld] said in a phone interview with the AP. "They gave him a slap on the wrist and told him not to do it again. If it was anybody else that did something like this, they'd lose their job."
Domestic violence experts called Kratz's text messages disturbing and unethical for several reasons, including the power differential between a prosecutor and a younger abuse victim.
"If what's being alleged is true, it's sad a prosecutor would use the same sort of power and control over a woman who has already experienced that in her personal life," said Patti Seger, executive director of the Wisconsin Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
Kratz, who flirted with a run for Congress in 2008, may be best known for prosecuting Steven Avery in the 2005 killing of Teresa Halbach, a 25-year-old photographer. The case received national attention because Avery had spent 18 years behind bars for a rape he did not commit in a separate case before DNA evidence implicated someone else.
A spokeswoman said the victims' rights board has not received a complaint about Kratz and is not investigating his conduct toward [name withheld].
Kratz cited an undisclosed conflict of interest in stepping away from the abuse case after [name withheld] reported the text messages, court records show. A special prosecutor won a conviction on one felony count of strangulation against the man, [name withheld].
[name withheld] said Kratz sent the first text minutes after she left his office, where he had interviewed her about the case.
He said it was nice talking and "you have such potential," signing the message "KEN (your favorite DA)." Twenty minutes later, he added, "I wish you weren't one of this office's clients. You'd be a cool person to know!" But he quickly tried to start a relationship and told her to keep quiet about the texts.
[name withheld] at first was polite, saying Kratz was "a nice person" and thanking him for praise. By the second day, she responded with answers such as "dono" or "no." Kratz questioned whether her "low self-esteem" was to blame for the lack of interest.
"I'm serious! I'm the atty. I have the $350,000 house. I have the 6-figure career. You may be the tall, young, hot nymph, but I am the prize!" he texted.
Kratz told her the relationship would unfold slow enough for "Shannon's case to get done." ''Remember it would have to be special enough to risk all," he wrote.
[name withheld] said she went to police after the messages started becoming "kind of vulgar." She provided copies of 30 messages and her responses, which the department released in response to an AP request.
The department referred the complaint to the state Division of Criminal Investigation. [name withheld], a college student and part-time preschool teacher who has moved to Merrill, said she has been told Kratz won't be charged because "they didn't think he did anything criminally wrong."
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Many teens face sexual harassment on the job
Labels: National , SexualHarassment
Original Article (Listen)
06/07/2010
By Eve Tahmincioglu
‘It continues to be an epidemic in many workplaces,’ says EEOC attorney
Martha, 15, believes she was a victim of sexual harassment when she worked as a ski instructor last winter for a New Jersey resort, but she didn’t feel she could complain.
Her 60-year old manager didn’t assault her but he was “just creepy,” said Martha, who did not want her full name used. “He would put his arm around me and hold my shoulder. He would whisper in my ear, ‘Sweetie,’” she explained. “I could feel his breath in my ear.”
It was one of the first jobs she had ever had, so Martha — who was 14 at the time — asked her parents what she should do. “My mom was upset about it but my dad said, ‘Wait a while and see,’” she said.
Since the ski season was about to end, and Martha had no plans to work at the resort again, she decided to drop it and never went to her managers.
As teenagers get ready to head out to the nation’s malls, restaurants and resorts to start summer jobs, government officials and teen advocates want to caution young workers — and their parents — that sexual harassment is rampant in the workplace.
But getting girls and boys to report such acts has been a challenge because some teens are just too immature or ignorant of their rights. Others want to do well in those first gigs and not rock the boat.
“It continues to be an epidemic in many workplaces, restaurants, retails, etc., where young people work,” said Mary O’Neill, a regional attorney for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for the Phoenix district covering Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.
Indeed, most teenagers never report such behavior, experts said, because many teens are either too embarrassed or just don’t realize that legally they don’t have to put up with such sleazy behavior.
The official EEOC numbers on teen sexual harassment charges are only about 107 as of May 18. That compares to 237 charges of sexual harassment against kids 19 and younger for all of 2009. (Date of birth is not required when filing such charges with the EEOC.)
O’Neill believes the numbers are much higher and said the data is just the “tip of the iceberg.” Teens, she added, are less likely than adults to blow the whistle on such acts.
“They just think, ‘This is my first job, so this is what I have to tolerate,’” she said.
Last March, Burger King agreed to pay $85,000 to settle a teen sexual harassment suit with the EEOC.
“The harassment included unwelcome touching, overt sexual advances, and frequent requests for sexual favors. The suit further asserted that (the teenaged worker) complained about the harassment to her assistant managers, who failed to take appropriate action to stop the unlawful conduct,” according to the EEOC filing.
And in November, Ruby Tuesday agreed to pay $225,000 to settle a case with the EEOC involving a general manager who subjected female employees, including teens, to “crude sexual propositions” and “sexually explicit and graphic remarks.”
“Sexual harassment is always unacceptable, but when some of the victims are vulnerable teenagers, it is especially unconscionable,” said EEOC’s Acting Chairman Stuart Ishimaru at the time the settlement was announced.
What O’Neill has found in her investigations is that it’s typically one teen with a strong adult in their lives who’s most likely to come forward. When the agency begins to investigate, she added, more teens often come forward saying they also were harassed.
In one case, a manager was sexually harassing boys who were all 15 and 16, asking them for sex and grabbing their private parts, but no one came forward until one boy’s grandfather forced him to. “He was so embarrassed,” O’Neill said, “but the grandfather said, ‘You have to complain.’”
“My sense from my reporting is there are sexual predators that figured out places where teens work in the summer are candy shops for them,” she said.
Making matters worse, many teens are more accessible than ever thanks to social networking sites and mobile devices, opening them up to more potential abuse.
“We have had a couple of cases where the individual was ‘texted’ late night by their supervisor, with subtle or not-so-subtle overtures,” said Teresa Bult, an employment attorney for Constangy, Brooks & Smith, a firm that represent employers.
“The younger employees, teenagers, don't quite know how to deal with this type of text message, and most don't seem to report it until later, when someone else raises a harassment charge against the same person,” she said. “In two cases, the younger employee didn't raise it until they were interviewed as a witness after another complaint.”
But the courts as they pertain to minors in the workplace often view the laws differently, Bult said. For example, even if a teen consented to sex with an adult manager, it is still considered statutory rape because the teen was underaged.
In the case of a teen flirting with a boss who is making sexual advances, Bult added, if a sexual harassment claim is brought, the courts may find that the boss and the company were at fault even if actual intercourse did not occur. The thinking is that the adult should have known better, she said.
While the thought of our kids being harassed at work is scary, most teens will survive their first forays into the workplace unscathed by unsavory sexual behavior. And working is a great experience for teens and can build confidence and responsibility, according to a study done by Jeylan Mortimer, professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota.
But teens need information before they punch their first time clock.
That means parents, the education system, and governments need to do what they can to help protect teens when they head into the workplace, Graff said.
“There are workshops and lessons for kindergartners and first-graders on good touch, bad touch and saying no, but we need more sophisticated lessons at 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,” Graff said. “We don’t offer that, and that’s when they start developing. Their bodies look different than their minds.”
Eve Tahmincioglu writes the weekly "Your Career" column for msnbc.com and chronicles workplace issues in her blog, CareerDiva.net.
06/07/2010
By Eve Tahmincioglu
‘It continues to be an epidemic in many workplaces,’ says EEOC attorney
Martha, 15, believes she was a victim of sexual harassment when she worked as a ski instructor last winter for a New Jersey resort, but she didn’t feel she could complain.
Her 60-year old manager didn’t assault her but he was “just creepy,” said Martha, who did not want her full name used. “He would put his arm around me and hold my shoulder. He would whisper in my ear, ‘Sweetie,’” she explained. “I could feel his breath in my ear.”
It was one of the first jobs she had ever had, so Martha — who was 14 at the time — asked her parents what she should do. “My mom was upset about it but my dad said, ‘Wait a while and see,’” she said.
Since the ski season was about to end, and Martha had no plans to work at the resort again, she decided to drop it and never went to her managers.
As teenagers get ready to head out to the nation’s malls, restaurants and resorts to start summer jobs, government officials and teen advocates want to caution young workers — and their parents — that sexual harassment is rampant in the workplace.
But getting girls and boys to report such acts has been a challenge because some teens are just too immature or ignorant of their rights. Others want to do well in those first gigs and not rock the boat.
“It continues to be an epidemic in many workplaces, restaurants, retails, etc., where young people work,” said Mary O’Neill, a regional attorney for the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for the Phoenix district covering Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming.
Indeed, most teenagers never report such behavior, experts said, because many teens are either too embarrassed or just don’t realize that legally they don’t have to put up with such sleazy behavior.
The official EEOC numbers on teen sexual harassment charges are only about 107 as of May 18. That compares to 237 charges of sexual harassment against kids 19 and younger for all of 2009. (Date of birth is not required when filing such charges with the EEOC.)
O’Neill believes the numbers are much higher and said the data is just the “tip of the iceberg.” Teens, she added, are less likely than adults to blow the whistle on such acts.
“They just think, ‘This is my first job, so this is what I have to tolerate,’” she said.
Companies hit by lawsuits
Such cases show up at major companies such as Burger King, McDonalds, Starbucks and Ruby Tuesday, just to name a few.Last March, Burger King agreed to pay $85,000 to settle a teen sexual harassment suit with the EEOC.
“The harassment included unwelcome touching, overt sexual advances, and frequent requests for sexual favors. The suit further asserted that (the teenaged worker) complained about the harassment to her assistant managers, who failed to take appropriate action to stop the unlawful conduct,” according to the EEOC filing.
And in November, Ruby Tuesday agreed to pay $225,000 to settle a case with the EEOC involving a general manager who subjected female employees, including teens, to “crude sexual propositions” and “sexually explicit and graphic remarks.”
“Sexual harassment is always unacceptable, but when some of the victims are vulnerable teenagers, it is especially unconscionable,” said EEOC’s Acting Chairman Stuart Ishimaru at the time the settlement was announced.
What O’Neill has found in her investigations is that it’s typically one teen with a strong adult in their lives who’s most likely to come forward. When the agency begins to investigate, she added, more teens often come forward saying they also were harassed.
In one case, a manager was sexually harassing boys who were all 15 and 16, asking them for sex and grabbing their private parts, but no one came forward until one boy’s grandfather forced him to. “He was so embarrassed,” O’Neill said, “but the grandfather said, ‘You have to complain.’”
Teens targeted
E.J. Graff, associate director and senior researcher for Brandeis University’s Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism, has long researched the issue of teens and harassment at work. She estimates based on government and independent reports that as many as 200,000 teens are harassed or assaulted at work every year.“My sense from my reporting is there are sexual predators that figured out places where teens work in the summer are candy shops for them,” she said.
Making matters worse, many teens are more accessible than ever thanks to social networking sites and mobile devices, opening them up to more potential abuse.
“We have had a couple of cases where the individual was ‘texted’ late night by their supervisor, with subtle or not-so-subtle overtures,” said Teresa Bult, an employment attorney for Constangy, Brooks & Smith, a firm that represent employers.
“The younger employees, teenagers, don't quite know how to deal with this type of text message, and most don't seem to report it until later, when someone else raises a harassment charge against the same person,” she said. “In two cases, the younger employee didn't raise it until they were interviewed as a witness after another complaint.”
But the courts as they pertain to minors in the workplace often view the laws differently, Bult said. For example, even if a teen consented to sex with an adult manager, it is still considered statutory rape because the teen was underaged.
In the case of a teen flirting with a boss who is making sexual advances, Bult added, if a sexual harassment claim is brought, the courts may find that the boss and the company were at fault even if actual intercourse did not occur. The thinking is that the adult should have known better, she said.
While the thought of our kids being harassed at work is scary, most teens will survive their first forays into the workplace unscathed by unsavory sexual behavior. And working is a great experience for teens and can build confidence and responsibility, according to a study done by Jeylan Mortimer, professor of sociology at the University of Minnesota.
But teens need information before they punch their first time clock.
That means parents, the education system, and governments need to do what they can to help protect teens when they head into the workplace, Graff said.
“There are workshops and lessons for kindergartners and first-graders on good touch, bad touch and saying no, but we need more sophisticated lessons at 12, 13, 14, 15, 16,” Graff said. “We don’t offer that, and that’s when they start developing. Their bodies look different than their minds.”
Eve Tahmincioglu writes the weekly "Your Career" column for msnbc.com and chronicles workplace issues in her blog, CareerDiva.net.
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
NJ - New Jersey Lawmakers Move to Boost Online Harassment Law
Labels: CrimeInternet , NewJersey , OnlineSafety , SexualHarassment
View the article here
I don't really like the image, it further demonizes men, IMO. Women commit sexual harassment as well.
03/02/2009
A slate of bills targeting online sexual harassment and related electronic crimes have advanced in the New Jersey Legislature.
Among the 10 bills approved Thursday by the Assembly's Judiciary Committee was a measure that proposes a range of penalties for making sexually offensive comments on social networking sites.
At least two American teenagers in recent years have killed themselves after being harassed or bullied over the Internet.
Another measure mandates that information technology workers who find child pornography on computers must notify the police.
The measures approved Thursday will now be considered by the full Assembly.
I don't really like the image, it further demonizes men, IMO. Women commit sexual harassment as well.
03/02/2009
A slate of bills targeting online sexual harassment and related electronic crimes have advanced in the New Jersey Legislature.
Among the 10 bills approved Thursday by the Assembly's Judiciary Committee was a measure that proposes a range of penalties for making sexually offensive comments on social networking sites.
At least two American teenagers in recent years have killed themselves after being harassed or bullied over the Internet.
Another measure mandates that information technology workers who find child pornography on computers must notify the police.
The measures approved Thursday will now be considered by the full Assembly.
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)
















