Original Article
05/17/2013
JEFFERSON CITY (AP) - People convicted of committing sexual crimes when they're 17 or younger would not appear on Missouri's public website of sex offenders under legislation heading to Gov. Jay Nixon.
Lawmakers gave the measure (HB-301, PDF) final approval Friday.
The names of such offenders would still be included on the state's official sex offender registry — but only law enforcement officials would have access to the registry. Juvenile offenders eventually could be removed from that registry through a court order.
- This is how it should be for all ex-offenders. The list should be offline and used by police only.
The legislation would also let local law enforcement access the Department of Corrections' GPS monitoring logs of sex offenders who are out on conditional release.
- Search:
- Site
- ACLU
- Legislature
- Other
Search this site only:
Search all ACLU sites:
Search all state legislatures:
Search other related sites, or Google:
| Recommended: | State News: |
Support us today by using the donation links on the left
Showing posts with label GPS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GPS. Show all posts
Saturday, May 18, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
AUSTRALIA - Find a better way to keep our children safe
Labels: Australia , CirclesOfSupport , GPS
Original Article
05/16/2013
By ROB HULLS
Sex offenders are seen by the community as the scum of the Earth. They are considered to be monsters, people who should be abandoned by the community, locked up for a very long time, placed on a sex offenders register and, if they are ever released, monitored for life.
Recently, we read in the Herald Sun that new technology will mean that these heinous offenders will have tracking devices attached to them, so if they're not in jail, "we" know where they are.
But is there a better way? Does placing someone's name on a sex offenders register protect the community? Does putting an ankle bracelet on someone make our children safer? Let's look at some facts.
The Victorian Law Reform Commission's 2011 report on the Sex Offenders Registration Scheme found that there is little evidence to suggest that registration schemes are an effective means of reducing child sexual abuse because they deter offending. In fact, the report found that most sex offences are committed by people with no previous convictions for offences of that type.
Importantly, the report found that details about people who might be potentially dangerous reoffenders sit alongside those of offenders who pose no risk of harm, with police and child protection authorities having no reasonable means of allocating risk ratings, and investigative resources, to particular offenders. Despite that, at the current rate of increase, there will be approximately 10,000 registrations by 2020.
No doubt the new, you-beaut, whiz-bang one-size-fits-all tracking scheme will also grow like topsy with, as the Herald Sun reports, sex offenders, arsonists and boozers being monitored 24/7. That should make us all feel safe - shouldn't it?
The reality is quite different. Recently in Indianapolis in the US the systems at a GPS tracking company crashed.
Believe it or not, police throughout the nation had to scramble and lock up 16,000 criminals until the problem was solved. And of course GPS monitoring relies on someone actually watching and understanding the signals being transmitted from the device. As critics of the system in Vancouver make clear, GPS monitoring does not alert corrections officers when an offender commits an offence, but merely indicates their location.
Again, I suspect, as with the registration scheme there will be no reasonable means of allocating risk and investigative resources. While the policy might, during a 24-hour news cycle, have the objective of making people think the Government is tough, and will make everyone safer from these deviants, it's not and it won't.
There is a better way, but it's hard and it involves the community not abandoning these people.
Circles of Support and Accountability, or CoSA, is a community-orientated, restorative justice-based reintegration program that assists people in their effort to re-enter society after a period of incarceration for a sexual offence. It exists in Nova Scotia, Canada as well as in some parts of the UK and USA.
A "circle" involves three to five trained volunteers from the community who commit themselves to forming a circle around, supporting and holding accountable the offender or "core member".
The circle meets regularly to facilitate the core member's practical needs such as access to medical services, assistance with housing and employment and providing emotional support. In return, the core member commits to open communication with the circle regarding his identified risk factors, problematic behaviour and day-to-day problems in an effort to end his offending and increase public safety.
The motto of CoSA is No more Victims: No one is Disposable. Early evaluations suggest that the approach works with massive reductions in recidivism, or reoffending rates, compared with offenders not involved in a "circle".
Yes, it's easy to dispose of people who commit crimes, but to do so places a big financial burden on all of us, and to what end? Crime rates rise while our prison population escalates and more money is spent on registers and tracking people.
If the community is serious about wanting to be safer and reducing crime, then surely we have to do more than just listen to the "tough on crime" rhetoric of our politicians. It's hard, but we have to get involved.
As a CoSA volunteer said: "I used to be like everyone else. I hated these guys. Then I met one. He's a human being. Once I understood that, I could not turn my back on him. I hate what he's done but if he's willing to do his part, I'm willing to be there to help him. I don't want there to be any more victims."
And shouldn't that be the bottom line?
Rob Hulls was Victoria's attorney-general and now is director of RMIT's Centre for Innovative Justice
05/16/2013
By ROB HULLS
Sex offenders are seen by the community as the scum of the Earth. They are considered to be monsters, people who should be abandoned by the community, locked up for a very long time, placed on a sex offenders register and, if they are ever released, monitored for life.
Recently, we read in the Herald Sun that new technology will mean that these heinous offenders will have tracking devices attached to them, so if they're not in jail, "we" know where they are.
But is there a better way? Does placing someone's name on a sex offenders register protect the community? Does putting an ankle bracelet on someone make our children safer? Let's look at some facts.
The Victorian Law Reform Commission's 2011 report on the Sex Offenders Registration Scheme found that there is little evidence to suggest that registration schemes are an effective means of reducing child sexual abuse because they deter offending. In fact, the report found that most sex offences are committed by people with no previous convictions for offences of that type.
Importantly, the report found that details about people who might be potentially dangerous reoffenders sit alongside those of offenders who pose no risk of harm, with police and child protection authorities having no reasonable means of allocating risk ratings, and investigative resources, to particular offenders. Despite that, at the current rate of increase, there will be approximately 10,000 registrations by 2020.
No doubt the new, you-beaut, whiz-bang one-size-fits-all tracking scheme will also grow like topsy with, as the Herald Sun reports, sex offenders, arsonists and boozers being monitored 24/7. That should make us all feel safe - shouldn't it?
The reality is quite different. Recently in Indianapolis in the US the systems at a GPS tracking company crashed.
Believe it or not, police throughout the nation had to scramble and lock up 16,000 criminals until the problem was solved. And of course GPS monitoring relies on someone actually watching and understanding the signals being transmitted from the device. As critics of the system in Vancouver make clear, GPS monitoring does not alert corrections officers when an offender commits an offence, but merely indicates their location.
Again, I suspect, as with the registration scheme there will be no reasonable means of allocating risk and investigative resources. While the policy might, during a 24-hour news cycle, have the objective of making people think the Government is tough, and will make everyone safer from these deviants, it's not and it won't.
There is a better way, but it's hard and it involves the community not abandoning these people.
Circles of Support and Accountability, or CoSA, is a community-orientated, restorative justice-based reintegration program that assists people in their effort to re-enter society after a period of incarceration for a sexual offence. It exists in Nova Scotia, Canada as well as in some parts of the UK and USA.
A "circle" involves three to five trained volunteers from the community who commit themselves to forming a circle around, supporting and holding accountable the offender or "core member".
The circle meets regularly to facilitate the core member's practical needs such as access to medical services, assistance with housing and employment and providing emotional support. In return, the core member commits to open communication with the circle regarding his identified risk factors, problematic behaviour and day-to-day problems in an effort to end his offending and increase public safety.
The motto of CoSA is No more Victims: No one is Disposable. Early evaluations suggest that the approach works with massive reductions in recidivism, or reoffending rates, compared with offenders not involved in a "circle".
Yes, it's easy to dispose of people who commit crimes, but to do so places a big financial burden on all of us, and to what end? Crime rates rise while our prison population escalates and more money is spent on registers and tracking people.
If the community is serious about wanting to be safer and reducing crime, then surely we have to do more than just listen to the "tough on crime" rhetoric of our politicians. It's hard, but we have to get involved.
As a CoSA volunteer said: "I used to be like everyone else. I hated these guys. Then I met one. He's a human being. Once I understood that, I could not turn my back on him. I hate what he's done but if he's willing to do his part, I'm willing to be there to help him. I don't want there to be any more victims."
And shouldn't that be the bottom line?
Rob Hulls was Victoria's attorney-general and now is director of RMIT's Centre for Innovative Justice
Sunday, May 12, 2013
AUSTRALIA - New technology to monitor sex offenders, arsonists and boozers 24/7
Original Article05/13/2013
By Matt Johnston
Victoria's worst sex
And in an Australian-first, judges will be able to order serious offenders on booze bans to wear ankle bracelets that monitor their blood-alcohol content through sweat molecules.
The introduction of bracelets with GPS monitoring also gives courts the power to have arsonists tracked during bushfire seasons - a key Coalition election promise.
See Also:
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
CA - Examining Chelsea's Law, Part II -- Who Will Chelsea's Law Effect?
Labels: California , ChelseasLaw , GPS
Original Article
05/08/2013
By Shelomith Stow
Chelsea’s Law, signed into California law on September 9, 2010, by then-governor Schwarzenegger scant months after the court sentenced John Gardner to two life sentences without parole for the murders of Amber Dubois and Chelsea King is, at the heart of it, a compulsory minimum sentencing law. It allows life without parole sentences for adults who, if while committing a sexual offense against a child, kidnap, drug, bind, torture, or use a weapon. Life terms could apply for both first-time and repeat offenders. It also increases other penalties, including requiring lifetime parole with GPS tracking for those convicted of forcible sex crimes against children under fourteen.
According to available information, 74 individuals have been charged under Chelsea’s Law since its beginning, and eight have had their sentences impacted because of it.
The father of Chelsea, Brian King, and CA legislator Nathan Fletcher, author of Chelsea’s Law, are now lobbying to extend the bill into other states with the goal being a version of the law in all states. Two organizations, Chelsea’s Light Foundation and Chelsea’s Shield, have been formed to further this agenda.
See Also:
05/08/2013
By Shelomith Stow
Chelsea’s Law, signed into California law on September 9, 2010, by then-governor Schwarzenegger scant months after the court sentenced John Gardner to two life sentences without parole for the murders of Amber Dubois and Chelsea King is, at the heart of it, a compulsory minimum sentencing law. It allows life without parole sentences for adults who, if while committing a sexual offense against a child, kidnap, drug, bind, torture, or use a weapon. Life terms could apply for both first-time and repeat offenders. It also increases other penalties, including requiring lifetime parole with GPS tracking for those convicted of forcible sex crimes against children under fourteen.
According to available information, 74 individuals have been charged under Chelsea’s Law since its beginning, and eight have had their sentences impacted because of it.
The father of Chelsea, Brian King, and CA legislator Nathan Fletcher, author of Chelsea’s Law, are now lobbying to extend the bill into other states with the goal being a version of the law in all states. Two organizations, Chelsea’s Light Foundation and Chelsea’s Shield, have been formed to further this agenda.
See Also:
Thursday, May 2, 2013
UK - 'I'm not going anywhere': UK can't kick out Somalian sex offender due to HIS human rights
Labels: Deportation , GPS , UnitedKingdom
Original Article
05/02/2013
By Anil Dawar
The folly of tying Britain to the Court of Human Rights has been graphically highlighted by a Somalian criminal who had his deportation blocked and then carried out a sickening sex attack.
Convicted street robber [name withheld] spent an estimated £80,000 of taxpayers’ cash taking his battle to stay in the UK through the British courts and then into Europe.
But within three years of persuading the Euro judges to halt attempts to boot him out to protect his human rights, [name withheld] was jailed for a sexually assaulting a woman.
The jobless Somalian is estimated to have cost the country more than £400,000 in legal aid, prison costs and state benefits.
Home Office officials still have a deportation order for [name withheld] ready to enforce if peace returns to his homeland but the unrepentant Somalian yesterday boasted: “I am not going anywhere!”
The registered sex offender - who has to wear an electronic tag - broke cover to make a brazen bid to get the order lifted saying his catalogue of crimes was just “one mistake”.
He said: “I have been in the deportation process for almost six years. Surely I’ve earned the right to have my case revisited? How can I be deported for one mistake?”
“I used to say, ‘if you’re going to do it, do it’, Now I say, ‘I’m not going anywhere’.”
[name withheld], 26, arrived in the UK at the age of eight and now lives in Small Heath, Birmingham along with his 20-strong extended family.
As a teenager, he was twice put on probation for shoplifting before being jailed for three years in 2005 for a vicious street robbery.
During his stint behind bars the Home Office served him with a deportation order which he unsuccessfully appealed against twice.
Immigration officers were ready to get him on a plane in 2007 but the Somalian took his case to the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg where the judges ruled sending [name withheld] back to his homeland would breach his human rights.
But within 12 months of winning his reprieve, ungrateful [name withheld] was convicted of criminal damage and then, in 2011 jailed for a sexual assault.
The saga has infuriated campaigners battling to take back power for UK courts to decide British matters from the unelected judges in Strasbourg.
Euro MP, Gerard Batten said: “We shouldn’t be surprised if criminals from around the world are attracted to Britain because the government makes it easy for them to get in and the European Court of Human Rights makes it almost impossible to get rid of them.”
“To add insult to injury, when we fail to deport them they can stay here and live on benefits from our welfare state.”
Last night a Home Office spokesman said: “We take all necessary steps to deport people who break our laws and in 2012 we removed 4,500 foreign national offenders.”
“However, deportation can be delayed when offenders seek to frustrate the process or challenge us on human rights grounds. That is why we have now changed the rules to make it harder for convicted criminals to dodge deportation in the courts.”
05/02/2013
By Anil Dawar
The folly of tying Britain to the Court of Human Rights has been graphically highlighted by a Somalian criminal who had his deportation blocked and then carried out a sickening sex attack.
Convicted street robber [name withheld] spent an estimated £80,000 of taxpayers’ cash taking his battle to stay in the UK through the British courts and then into Europe.
But within three years of persuading the Euro judges to halt attempts to boot him out to protect his human rights, [name withheld] was jailed for a sexually assaulting a woman.
The jobless Somalian is estimated to have cost the country more than £400,000 in legal aid, prison costs and state benefits.
Home Office officials still have a deportation order for [name withheld] ready to enforce if peace returns to his homeland but the unrepentant Somalian yesterday boasted: “I am not going anywhere!”
The registered sex offender - who has to wear an electronic tag - broke cover to make a brazen bid to get the order lifted saying his catalogue of crimes was just “one mistake”.
He said: “I have been in the deportation process for almost six years. Surely I’ve earned the right to have my case revisited? How can I be deported for one mistake?”
“I used to say, ‘if you’re going to do it, do it’, Now I say, ‘I’m not going anywhere’.”
[name withheld], 26, arrived in the UK at the age of eight and now lives in Small Heath, Birmingham along with his 20-strong extended family.
As a teenager, he was twice put on probation for shoplifting before being jailed for three years in 2005 for a vicious street robbery.
During his stint behind bars the Home Office served him with a deportation order which he unsuccessfully appealed against twice.
Immigration officers were ready to get him on a plane in 2007 but the Somalian took his case to the Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg where the judges ruled sending [name withheld] back to his homeland would breach his human rights.
But within 12 months of winning his reprieve, ungrateful [name withheld] was convicted of criminal damage and then, in 2011 jailed for a sexual assault.
The saga has infuriated campaigners battling to take back power for UK courts to decide British matters from the unelected judges in Strasbourg.
Euro MP, Gerard Batten said: “We shouldn’t be surprised if criminals from around the world are attracted to Britain because the government makes it easy for them to get in and the European Court of Human Rights makes it almost impossible to get rid of them.”
“To add insult to injury, when we fail to deport them they can stay here and live on benefits from our welfare state.”
Last night a Home Office spokesman said: “We take all necessary steps to deport people who break our laws and in 2012 we removed 4,500 foreign national offenders.”
“However, deportation can be delayed when offenders seek to frustrate the process or challenge us on human rights grounds. That is why we have now changed the rules to make it harder for convicted criminals to dodge deportation in the courts.”
Wednesday, May 1, 2013
CA - Criminals are not obeying the laws, so let's pass another law for them to follow
Labels: California , FearMongering , GPS
Original Article
04/30/2013
By Paige St. John
A pared-down bill that would send sex offenders who repeatedly remove their GPS tracking devices back to state prison cleared its first legislative committee Tuesday, making progress where broader measures failed.
In a deal struck with Democratic leaders who seek to protect Gov. Jerry Brown's prison realignment plan, Sen. Ted Lieu amended his GPS-tampering bill to make first offenses punishable by a mandatory 180 days in county jail, the maximum penalty currently on the books.
Second offenses would require a year in county jail, and on the third offense, the parolee would be required to be returned to prison. The legislation would apply only to some 8,000 paroled sex offenders who are required to wear electronic monitors. It does not address gang members, domestic stalkers and other parolees the state may be tracking.
"To me this is not an issue that deals with realignment. It deals with the integrity of our GPS monitoring system," Lieu (D-Torrance) told the Senate Public Safety Committee just prior to a passing vote. He cited a federally funded study that shows sex offenders who are monitored by GPS systems are less likely to commit a new crime while on parole.
- So where is that study? Since it's not linked in the article, we can only assume this is the study (PDF) in question?
The amended bill had broad support from state law enforcement agencies. Earlier opponents, including public defenders, said they would consider the amendments.
[Updated, 2:30 p.m. April 30: A slate of Republican-backed measures that called for tougher penalties have had no success. The House Public Safety Committee on Tuesday killed a bill by Assemblyman Jim Patterson (R-Fresno) that required prison time for parolees who take off their GPS devices. Afterward, Patterson blasted Democrats on the committee who voted against his bill, saying they "now bear personal responsibility for the carnage to come."]
- Carnage? Really? Typical fear mongering as usual!
California is under federal court orders to reduce crowding in state prisons and Brown must, by Thursday, submit a plan to remove some 9,000 additional inmates. His 2011 realignment plan reduced the state prison population by more than 20,000 by making lower-level felonies a county jail offense and requiring counties to house parole violators. A Times investigation showed some counties, unable to fit parole violators in their jails, were setting them free, in turn leading to a sharp rise in sex offenders removing their GPS trackers.
In response to records requests from The Times, state corrections officials acknowledged more than 4,900 warrants filed against paroled sex offenders for disabling their GPS devices in the first 15 months after penalties for doing so were reduced.
SB57 (PDF) now goes to the Senate Appropriations committee.
See Also:
04/30/2013
By Paige St. John
A pared-down bill that would send sex offenders who repeatedly remove their GPS tracking devices back to state prison cleared its first legislative committee Tuesday, making progress where broader measures failed.
In a deal struck with Democratic leaders who seek to protect Gov. Jerry Brown's prison realignment plan, Sen. Ted Lieu amended his GPS-tampering bill to make first offenses punishable by a mandatory 180 days in county jail, the maximum penalty currently on the books.
Second offenses would require a year in county jail, and on the third offense, the parolee would be required to be returned to prison. The legislation would apply only to some 8,000 paroled sex offenders who are required to wear electronic monitors. It does not address gang members, domestic stalkers and other parolees the state may be tracking.
"To me this is not an issue that deals with realignment. It deals with the integrity of our GPS monitoring system," Lieu (D-Torrance) told the Senate Public Safety Committee just prior to a passing vote. He cited a federally funded study that shows sex offenders who are monitored by GPS systems are less likely to commit a new crime while on parole.
- So where is that study? Since it's not linked in the article, we can only assume this is the study (PDF) in question?
The amended bill had broad support from state law enforcement agencies. Earlier opponents, including public defenders, said they would consider the amendments.
[Updated, 2:30 p.m. April 30: A slate of Republican-backed measures that called for tougher penalties have had no success. The House Public Safety Committee on Tuesday killed a bill by Assemblyman Jim Patterson (R-Fresno) that required prison time for parolees who take off their GPS devices. Afterward, Patterson blasted Democrats on the committee who voted against his bill, saying they "now bear personal responsibility for the carnage to come."]
- Carnage? Really? Typical fear mongering as usual!
California is under federal court orders to reduce crowding in state prisons and Brown must, by Thursday, submit a plan to remove some 9,000 additional inmates. His 2011 realignment plan reduced the state prison population by more than 20,000 by making lower-level felonies a county jail offense and requiring counties to house parole violators. A Times investigation showed some counties, unable to fit parole violators in their jails, were setting them free, in turn leading to a sharp rise in sex offenders removing their GPS trackers.
In response to records requests from The Times, state corrections officials acknowledged more than 4,900 warrants filed against paroled sex offenders for disabling their GPS devices in the first 15 months after penalties for doing so were reduced.
SB57 (PDF) now goes to the Senate Appropriations committee.
See Also:
Monday, April 29, 2013
LA - More states move to GPS tracking to combat non-compliant sex offenders
Labels: Disinformation , GPS , Louisiana
Original Article
See the video at the above link.
04/26/2013
By Blake Hanson
NEW ORLEANS - Convicted sex offenders are required by law to register. But the I-Team has learned that at any one time, hundreds of sex offenders across southeast Louisiana are non-compliant.
Law enforcement experts say non-compliant sex offenders are more dangerous than any other type of offender.
- It may be true for some offenders, but putting them all into one basket like the above statement does, is untrue. And if you read the facts and not hearsay from people who claim to be "experts," you will see what they are saying is pure lies.
"The recidivism rate for sex offenders is greatly higher than any other crime," said Dave Benelli.
- Again, lies! See the facts here.
Benelli served eight years as commander of the NOPD sex crimes unit.
To help track non-compliant offenders, 23 states now require some degree of electronic monitoring.
The Mississippi House and Senate recently gave final approval to a bill that would require GPS tracking for convicted sex offenders who fail to register. The legislation is nicknamed "Lenora's Law" after Lenora Edgehard. Edgehard was found murdered in her home in August of 2012. The suspect in her death is her neighbor, a convicted sex offender who had failed to register.
- So would GPS have prevented this? Well, no! If a person is intent on committing a crime, like the above, they would just remove the GPS and commit the crime.
The I-Team looked at non-compliant sex offenders in southeast Louisiana's three largest parishes. As of April 25, 27 offenders were non-compliant in St. Tammany Parish. 29 offenders remained non-compliant who were last registered in Jefferson Parish, and 57 offenders are listed as non-compliant in Orleans Parish.
Benelli said the number of non-compliant offenders is not unusually higher than other cities of similar size. However, he said any non-compliant offender poses a threat, especially those who target children.
- Simply not true for all ex-offenders.
"The pedophiles are very conniving," said Benelli. "They'll do everything they can to commit a crime."
- Again, pure BS! Not all ex-sex offenders who abused a child are pedophiles, by definition, but the media and politicians continue their disinformation campaign by making it sound like all who have harmed children at one time or another, are pedophiles, which, if you read the facts, this is simply not true.
Even proponents of GPS tracking take note of its controversy in terms of constitutional rights. The Electronic Privacy Information Center, an organization that focuses on the protection of privacy rights, believes electronic tracking runs afoul of Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable search and seizure.
"There's an important privacy interest in an individual's movements over time," said Alan Butler with the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "It can reveal your associations, your beliefs, your activities, things everyone believes to be private."
Butler believes the ability for states to electronically track sex offenders can have a negative impact on the general public too.
"Long-term tracking sort of highlights the dangers for the everyday citizen, chilled speech, association and activities," said Butler.
- And eventually, under the guise of "preventing terrorism," you may one day be forced to wear a GPS device.
Louisiana already has stiff laws for sex offenders. It's one of nine states that allow for chemical castration in certain cases.
Although privacy organizations are against GPS tracking, Benelli believes it's considerably less invasive to alternatives like castration.
"If we have the technology, an uninvasive technology to protect other children from being molested, if we have the technology then I think we use every means possible to protect our children," said Benelli.
- But you are missing the point! Forcing someone to wear a GPS device will not prevent anything in all cases.
On Friday, our series on tracking sex offender continues on WDSU and WDSU.com. Our investigation will look into problems other states have had with GPS devices and we ask a lawmaker about the possibility of legislation coming to Louisiana.
See the video at the above link.
04/26/2013
By Blake Hanson
NEW ORLEANS - Convicted sex offenders are required by law to register. But the I-Team has learned that at any one time, hundreds of sex offenders across southeast Louisiana are non-compliant.
Law enforcement experts say non-compliant sex offenders are more dangerous than any other type of offender.
- It may be true for some offenders, but putting them all into one basket like the above statement does, is untrue. And if you read the facts and not hearsay from people who claim to be "experts," you will see what they are saying is pure lies.
"The recidivism rate for sex offenders is greatly higher than any other crime," said Dave Benelli.
- Again, lies! See the facts here.
Benelli served eight years as commander of the NOPD sex crimes unit.
To help track non-compliant offenders, 23 states now require some degree of electronic monitoring.
The Mississippi House and Senate recently gave final approval to a bill that would require GPS tracking for convicted sex offenders who fail to register. The legislation is nicknamed "Lenora's Law" after Lenora Edgehard. Edgehard was found murdered in her home in August of 2012. The suspect in her death is her neighbor, a convicted sex offender who had failed to register.
- So would GPS have prevented this? Well, no! If a person is intent on committing a crime, like the above, they would just remove the GPS and commit the crime.
The I-Team looked at non-compliant sex offenders in southeast Louisiana's three largest parishes. As of April 25, 27 offenders were non-compliant in St. Tammany Parish. 29 offenders remained non-compliant who were last registered in Jefferson Parish, and 57 offenders are listed as non-compliant in Orleans Parish.
Benelli said the number of non-compliant offenders is not unusually higher than other cities of similar size. However, he said any non-compliant offender poses a threat, especially those who target children.
- Simply not true for all ex-offenders.
"The pedophiles are very conniving," said Benelli. "They'll do everything they can to commit a crime."
- Again, pure BS! Not all ex-sex offenders who abused a child are pedophiles, by definition, but the media and politicians continue their disinformation campaign by making it sound like all who have harmed children at one time or another, are pedophiles, which, if you read the facts, this is simply not true.
Even proponents of GPS tracking take note of its controversy in terms of constitutional rights. The Electronic Privacy Information Center, an organization that focuses on the protection of privacy rights, believes electronic tracking runs afoul of Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable search and seizure.
"There's an important privacy interest in an individual's movements over time," said Alan Butler with the Electronic Privacy Information Center. "It can reveal your associations, your beliefs, your activities, things everyone believes to be private."
Butler believes the ability for states to electronically track sex offenders can have a negative impact on the general public too.
"Long-term tracking sort of highlights the dangers for the everyday citizen, chilled speech, association and activities," said Butler.
- And eventually, under the guise of "preventing terrorism," you may one day be forced to wear a GPS device.
Louisiana already has stiff laws for sex offenders. It's one of nine states that allow for chemical castration in certain cases.
Although privacy organizations are against GPS tracking, Benelli believes it's considerably less invasive to alternatives like castration.
"If we have the technology, an uninvasive technology to protect other children from being molested, if we have the technology then I think we use every means possible to protect our children," said Benelli.
- But you are missing the point! Forcing someone to wear a GPS device will not prevent anything in all cases.
On Friday, our series on tracking sex offender continues on WDSU and WDSU.com. Our investigation will look into problems other states have had with GPS devices and we ask a lawmaker about the possibility of legislation coming to Louisiana.
Friday, April 26, 2013
CA - Many sex offenders end up on the streets
Original Article
04/25/2013
By Keli Moore
Close to two weeks after [name withheld], a sexually violent predator, was released from prison as a transient into Santa Barbara County, numerous questions have surfaced surrounding safety issues at homeless services.
There are screening processes to stay at overnight shelters in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties, but anyone can go to Prado Day Center in San Luis Obispo to get a hot meal.
"If you apply for a place to live you have to tell them that you're a registered sex offender. It makes it really difficult," said a local man who wants to remain anonymous. He has been out of prison for almost two years and since then, the streets of San Luis Obispo have been his home.
"We can get help through the county health as far as just getting some medical help and stuff like that, but as far as food, shelter, clothing, you have to pretty much find it on your own," he said.
What he doesn't realize is there are some options.
"During the lunch time at Prado for the People's Kitchen, they are allowed to just get in the lunch line, eat their plate of food, and leave the facility with no questions asked," said Dee Torres, who is the homeless services coordinator for CAPSLO.
According to the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office, there are 470 registered sex offenders in the county and 52 of them are transients. This raises concern for families with kids who use local homeless services.
"There's a six to eight page intake form that we complete with each individual and some other basic questions that we ask right when they come through the door," said Torres.
But the screening process is not fool proof.
"There have been a few cases where we have found out after the fact that somebody wasn't registered on the database and they didn't disclose," said Torres.
Although there are screening processes in place, a kid could still be exposed to a sex offender.
Transients who are registered sex offenders are required by law to check in with the closest law enforcement agency every 30 days, and if they are still on parole, they are required to wear a GPS device.
04/25/2013
By Keli Moore
Close to two weeks after [name withheld], a sexually violent predator, was released from prison as a transient into Santa Barbara County, numerous questions have surfaced surrounding safety issues at homeless services.
There are screening processes to stay at overnight shelters in San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties, but anyone can go to Prado Day Center in San Luis Obispo to get a hot meal.
"If you apply for a place to live you have to tell them that you're a registered sex offender. It makes it really difficult," said a local man who wants to remain anonymous. He has been out of prison for almost two years and since then, the streets of San Luis Obispo have been his home.
"We can get help through the county health as far as just getting some medical help and stuff like that, but as far as food, shelter, clothing, you have to pretty much find it on your own," he said.
What he doesn't realize is there are some options.
"During the lunch time at Prado for the People's Kitchen, they are allowed to just get in the lunch line, eat their plate of food, and leave the facility with no questions asked," said Dee Torres, who is the homeless services coordinator for CAPSLO.
According to the San Luis Obispo County Sheriff's Office, there are 470 registered sex offenders in the county and 52 of them are transients. This raises concern for families with kids who use local homeless services.
"There's a six to eight page intake form that we complete with each individual and some other basic questions that we ask right when they come through the door," said Torres.
But the screening process is not fool proof.
"There have been a few cases where we have found out after the fact that somebody wasn't registered on the database and they didn't disclose," said Torres.
Although there are screening processes in place, a kid could still be exposed to a sex offender.
Transients who are registered sex offenders are required by law to check in with the closest law enforcement agency every 30 days, and if they are still on parole, they are required to wear a GPS device.
Thursday, April 18, 2013
NJ - Just the usual media vigilantism and fear mongering as well as disinformation
Labels: Disinformation , FearMongering , GPS , Media , NewJersey , Video
In the second video they try to tell you that having ex-offenders wearing GPS is why there is a low recidivism rate, but the facts are, ex-offenders have a low recidivism rate in the first place, so GPS is not why. Just the usual media vigilantism, fear mongering and disinformation as usual.
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
CA - Sexual offenses not a life sentence
Labels: California , Church , GPS , National , Park , Punishment , Residency , School , Treatment , WronglyAccused
Original Article
04/16/2013
By AMANDA ZIVE
Laws are always being made and revised when it comes to sexually-charged crimes. It’s a very difficult situation that many feel is preventable. The goal is an understandable one: protect the children.
The methods, on the other hand, are not.
Lumping together all felons, with sexually-charged crimes against them, is the first atrocity. Though classified as differing risk levels, the long term punishment for these crimes are the same. Sexual offenses range from child pornography, sexual battery and assault all the way to molestation and sexual annoyances.
The age of the offender, context of the offense, and even the severity of the action doesn’t deter the judicial system from giving these people lifetime punishments. Those who do properly register, even those with minor offenses, are barred from living in almost any busy city due to restrictions based on school, church and park locations for the rest of their lives.
But If the real aim is to protect children, than the studies done on offenders need to be taken into account.
According to the government-run Megan’s Law website, 90 percent of juvenile victims had known their assailant, while shockingly almost half the time it’s a family member doing the crime.
Barring all labeled a sexual deviants from living near schools is less helpful than banning family reunions for these people.
The reality is there is needed action. While a point can be made that sexually-charged crimes generally carry a lesser sentence than traditional violent crime, a gross stereotyping and lifelong damnation of all offenders isn’t going to help.
The attempt at crime prevention is valiant, but preventing criminals from moving on from their crimes hinders progression. If some of the efforts were shifted from punishment to rehabilitation, some convicts could successfully rejoin society as active members.
Unfortunately these people are rarely seen as mentally ill (which they often are) so they aren’t treated. Instead of identifying and treating the problem, we’ve resorted simply to removing it, seemingly forgetting that these felons are actually human beings.
A distasteful joke, or an inappropriate smack between coworkers could mean a lifetime of registering as a sex offender.
Clearly, something must be done to protect victims of this system: Those wrongfully accused, convicted of single offenses, or minor offenses must be offered forgiveness and a chance to rejoin a community.
In California, one is only awarded a life sentence in custody for murder or attempting it, or kidnapping with special circumstances like ransom. Yet, it is seen as just and fair to essentially imprison sex offenders for life by barring them from living near city buildings.
Sex offenders need to be treated the same as other criminals; a set amount of detention, a set amount of probation and the guarantee that with good behavior they can be forgiven.
Another flaw with these laws is how hard they are to enforce. With life terms, the registry of offenders is only ever going to grow.
Yet as of now, there is a constant increase of sex offenders not properly registering or reporting. When these members stop reporting, or remove GPS tracking anklets, they simply fall off of the grid entirely. With so many cases and such a heavy workload, officers often focus on the offenders they can locate.
Reasons for not reporting could include laziness, but it is a sign that the person is not willing to conform to what society demands of them for retribution. The punishment, if the assailant is located and detained, is generally a six-month sentence that is often reduced due to overcrowding; an empty threat and an unfit punishment.
Finally, these laws give a false sense of security to people with children who live near schools, parks or churches. Many are aware of these laws and feel safer knowing their neighbor isn’t a sexual deviant.
The truth is some offenders don’t report and statistics show offenders rarely abduct random children they don’t know.
These laws and restrictions, though they may be intended as prevention turn out to be nothing more than on-going punishments.
04/16/2013
By AMANDA ZIVE
Laws are always being made and revised when it comes to sexually-charged crimes. It’s a very difficult situation that many feel is preventable. The goal is an understandable one: protect the children.
The methods, on the other hand, are not.
Lumping together all felons, with sexually-charged crimes against them, is the first atrocity. Though classified as differing risk levels, the long term punishment for these crimes are the same. Sexual offenses range from child pornography, sexual battery and assault all the way to molestation and sexual annoyances.
The age of the offender, context of the offense, and even the severity of the action doesn’t deter the judicial system from giving these people lifetime punishments. Those who do properly register, even those with minor offenses, are barred from living in almost any busy city due to restrictions based on school, church and park locations for the rest of their lives.
But If the real aim is to protect children, than the studies done on offenders need to be taken into account.
According to the government-run Megan’s Law website, 90 percent of juvenile victims had known their assailant, while shockingly almost half the time it’s a family member doing the crime.
Barring all labeled a sexual deviants from living near schools is less helpful than banning family reunions for these people.
The reality is there is needed action. While a point can be made that sexually-charged crimes generally carry a lesser sentence than traditional violent crime, a gross stereotyping and lifelong damnation of all offenders isn’t going to help.
The attempt at crime prevention is valiant, but preventing criminals from moving on from their crimes hinders progression. If some of the efforts were shifted from punishment to rehabilitation, some convicts could successfully rejoin society as active members.
Unfortunately these people are rarely seen as mentally ill (which they often are) so they aren’t treated. Instead of identifying and treating the problem, we’ve resorted simply to removing it, seemingly forgetting that these felons are actually human beings.
A distasteful joke, or an inappropriate smack between coworkers could mean a lifetime of registering as a sex offender.
Clearly, something must be done to protect victims of this system: Those wrongfully accused, convicted of single offenses, or minor offenses must be offered forgiveness and a chance to rejoin a community.
In California, one is only awarded a life sentence in custody for murder or attempting it, or kidnapping with special circumstances like ransom. Yet, it is seen as just and fair to essentially imprison sex offenders for life by barring them from living near city buildings.
Sex offenders need to be treated the same as other criminals; a set amount of detention, a set amount of probation and the guarantee that with good behavior they can be forgiven.
Another flaw with these laws is how hard they are to enforce. With life terms, the registry of offenders is only ever going to grow.
Yet as of now, there is a constant increase of sex offenders not properly registering or reporting. When these members stop reporting, or remove GPS tracking anklets, they simply fall off of the grid entirely. With so many cases and such a heavy workload, officers often focus on the offenders they can locate.
Reasons for not reporting could include laziness, but it is a sign that the person is not willing to conform to what society demands of them for retribution. The punishment, if the assailant is located and detained, is generally a six-month sentence that is often reduced due to overcrowding; an empty threat and an unfit punishment.
Finally, these laws give a false sense of security to people with children who live near schools, parks or churches. Many are aware of these laws and feel safer knowing their neighbor isn’t a sexual deviant.
The truth is some offenders don’t report and statistics show offenders rarely abduct random children they don’t know.
These laws and restrictions, though they may be intended as prevention turn out to be nothing more than on-going punishments.
Friday, April 12, 2013
CA - New bill would give tougher punishments to paroled sex offenders who cut their GPS trackers
Labels: California , Disinformation , GPS , Video
Original Article
You will notice in the video below, many inmates are wearing pink clothes. Sound familiar? It should, Hitler did that to prisoners as well, as you can see here.
04/11/2013
By Nannette Miranda
SACRAMENTO - The jump in the number of high-risk sex offenders who are cutting off their GPS ankle trackers is actually bigger than previously thought.
The number has almost doubled since the prison realignment policy change in October 2011, which sends parolees to county jail instead of state prison for certain relatively minor violations.
In the 15 months prior to the policy change, 3,117 warrants were issued for sex offender fugitives; the 15 months following the policy change, nearly 5,000 warrants were issued - a 58 percent increase.
Previously, 30 percent of paroled sex offenders had cut off their monitors.
"If someone absconds, we go after them and 92% of the time, we catch them and we do so within 12 days on average."
But since realignment, being recaptured means only a few days at the local lockup, but if that facility is overcrowded, it could mean no jail time at all.
Critics said that's why more and more parolees are ditching their GPS: the consequences are weak.
"Clearly, they're not cutting them off to have a drink of a cup of coffee unmonitored," Sen. Ted Lieu said. "They're cutting them off because they want opportunities to commit new crimes."
- You will notice he doesn't bother to show facts about how many have cut off their GPS and committed another crime, related or not, it's just his personal opinion. We are sure this may be the case for some, but a vast majority do it so they can have somewhat of a normal life, get a job, home, etc.
Take the recent Stockton case of [name withheld], a high-risk paroled sex offender who was in and out of jail for months charged with drugs and repeatedly disabling his GPS tracker. [name withheld] wasn't a fugitive for the GPS issue, but he was supposed to be in jail for a different parole violation; however, due to overcrowding he was released early.
- So if it wasn't about cutting off his GPS and committing another crime, why bring it up?
"He received a 30-sentence and was released the next day," San Joaquin County Deputy District Attroney Sherri Adams said on Feb. 28.
A few days later, police arrested him for killing and raping his 76-year-old grandmother.
- Okay, so lock him up for life for killing someone just like you'd do with anybody else. But, this has nothing to do with cutting off GPS, it's about the prison realignment, and is relevant to this story, in our opinion.
Lieu has a proposal that puts parolees who cut off their electronic monitors back in state prison.
"What the studies show are that if you're a sex offender not on GPS monitoring, your rate of recidivism increases three times," Lieu said.
- Again, not true, just a personal opinion. The facts are that sex offenders have one of the lowest re-offense rates of all other criminals, but you don't hear him complaining about all the other criminals who commit further crimes, related or not.
The Senate Public Safety Committee is set to hear Lieu's bill in a couple of weeks. However, lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown have been reluctant to send more people to prison because of a court order to reduce the prison population.
You will notice in the video below, many inmates are wearing pink clothes. Sound familiar? It should, Hitler did that to prisoners as well, as you can see here.
04/11/2013
By Nannette Miranda
SACRAMENTO - The jump in the number of high-risk sex offenders who are cutting off their GPS ankle trackers is actually bigger than previously thought.
The number has almost doubled since the prison realignment policy change in October 2011, which sends parolees to county jail instead of state prison for certain relatively minor violations.
In the 15 months prior to the policy change, 3,117 warrants were issued for sex offender fugitives; the 15 months following the policy change, nearly 5,000 warrants were issued - a 58 percent increase.
Previously, 30 percent of paroled sex offenders had cut off their monitors.
"If someone absconds, we go after them and 92% of the time, we catch them and we do so within 12 days on average."
But since realignment, being recaptured means only a few days at the local lockup, but if that facility is overcrowded, it could mean no jail time at all.
Critics said that's why more and more parolees are ditching their GPS: the consequences are weak.
"Clearly, they're not cutting them off to have a drink of a cup of coffee unmonitored," Sen. Ted Lieu said. "They're cutting them off because they want opportunities to commit new crimes."
- You will notice he doesn't bother to show facts about how many have cut off their GPS and committed another crime, related or not, it's just his personal opinion. We are sure this may be the case for some, but a vast majority do it so they can have somewhat of a normal life, get a job, home, etc.
Take the recent Stockton case of [name withheld], a high-risk paroled sex offender who was in and out of jail for months charged with drugs and repeatedly disabling his GPS tracker. [name withheld] wasn't a fugitive for the GPS issue, but he was supposed to be in jail for a different parole violation; however, due to overcrowding he was released early.
- So if it wasn't about cutting off his GPS and committing another crime, why bring it up?
"He received a 30-sentence and was released the next day," San Joaquin County Deputy District Attroney Sherri Adams said on Feb. 28.
A few days later, police arrested him for killing and raping his 76-year-old grandmother.
- Okay, so lock him up for life for killing someone just like you'd do with anybody else. But, this has nothing to do with cutting off GPS, it's about the prison realignment, and is relevant to this story, in our opinion.
Lieu has a proposal that puts parolees who cut off their electronic monitors back in state prison.
"What the studies show are that if you're a sex offender not on GPS monitoring, your rate of recidivism increases three times," Lieu said.
- Again, not true, just a personal opinion. The facts are that sex offenders have one of the lowest re-offense rates of all other criminals, but you don't hear him complaining about all the other criminals who commit further crimes, related or not.
The Senate Public Safety Committee is set to hear Lieu's bill in a couple of weeks. However, lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown have been reluctant to send more people to prison because of a court order to reduce the prison population.
Monday, April 1, 2013
CA - Tests found major flaws in parolee GPS monitoring devices
Labels: California , GPS , School
Original Article
03/30/2013
By Paige St. John
One company's devices were deemed so unreliable that California ordered a complete switch to another firm's, citing 'imminent danger' to the public. A lawsuit ensued.
A little more than a year ago, California quietly began conducting tests on the GPS monitoring devices that track the movements of thousands of sex offenders.
The results were alarming.
Corrections officials found the devices used in half the state were so inaccurate and unreliable that the public was "in imminent danger."
Batteries died early, cases cracked, reported locations were off by as much as three miles. Officials also found that tampering alerts failed and offenders were able to disappear by covering the devices with foil, deploying illegal GPS jammers or ducking into cars or buildings.
The state abruptly ordered parole agents to remove every ankle monitor in use from north of Los Angeles to the Oregon border. In their place, they strapped on devices made by a different manufacturer — a mass migration that left California's criminal tracking system not operational for several hours.
The test results provide a glimpse of the blind spots in electronic monitoring, even as those systems are promoted to law enforcement agencies as a safe alternative to incarceration. The flaws in the equipment raise the question of whether the state can deliver what Jessica's Law (California Proposition 83 PDF) promised when voters approved it in 2006: round-the-clock tracking of serious sex offenders.
In a lawsuit over the state's GPS contracting, corrections attorneys persuaded a judge to seal information about the failures, arguing that test results could show criminals how to avoid being tracked and give parole violators grounds to appeal convictions.
The information, they warned, would "erode public trust" in electronic monitoring programs. The devices, they said, deter crime only if offenders believe their locations are being tracked every minute.
"The more reliable the devices are believed to be, the less likely a parolee may be to attempt to defeat the system," GPS program director Denise Milano wrote in a court statement.
State officials say the replacement devices have largely resolved the problems, but officials so far have refused to release test data showing what, if any, improvements were gained.
Through interviews and by comparing censored documents obtained from multiple sources, The Times was able to piece together most of what the state persuaded the courts to black out.
GPS tracking devices are designed to alert authorities if the wearer tampers with the device, tries to flee or strays too close to a school or other forbidden area. Currently, 7,900 high-risk California parolees and felons — most of them sex offenders or gang members — wear the devices strapped to their ankles.
The monitors work by picking up signals from GPS satellites and transmitting the location information by cellular networks to a central computer. Just like GPS devices used by drivers or hikers, the monitors can fail where buildings block signals or where cell reception is spotty.
But that is not the monitoring system's sole vulnerability: A Times investigation in February found that thousands of child molesters, rapists and other high-risk parolees were removing or disarming their tracking devices — often with little risk of serving time for it because California's jails are too full to hold them.
The state's testing was conducted as part of a winner-take-all contest for the nation's largest electronic monitoring contract, worth more than $51 million over six years. Industry experts said they were the most exhaustive field trials they had seen.
When statewide monitoring began in 2008, California split the work between a division of 3M Co. and Houston-based Satellite Tracking of People, or STOP. The 3M device was used to track some 4,000 parolees in all but six Southern California counties. STOP had the rest of the state, including Los Angeles.
When California later sought to switch to a single provider, 3M came in with the low bid.
For a week in late 2011, parole agents abused both companies' devices. They were dropped four feet onto concrete, wrapped in foil to block their signals and submerged as long as three hours in a swimming pool. Testers allowed batteries to run dead, cut ankle straps and traveled into areas beyond the reach of satellite and cellular phone signals.
Without revealing full details of the tests, officials declared 3M's devices so faulty that the state rejected the company's bid. When 3M protested, Milano began a second round of tests that she said showed 3M's ankle monitors posed a public safety emergency.
The state claimed that 3M's devices failed to meet 46 of 102 field-tested standards for the equipment, although the company said a fourth of the failures occurred because the state had not provided the phone numbers needed to send automated text alerts.
One agent who participated in the tests, Denise LeBard, said in a court statement that 3M's ankle monitors were "inundated with defects."
Among the problems: 3M's devices failed to collect a GPS location every minute, phone in that information every 10 minutes and forward a text message to a parole agent if a problem was detected. Without revealing how well STOP performed, the state said 3M collected only 45% of the possible GPS points.
Testers also were able to fool 3M's GPS devices by wrapping monitors in foil, something that triggers an alarm on STOP's device because it has a metal detector.
Engineers and experts within 3M's electronic monitoring division vigorously dispute the alleged faults. They accused California of rigging the tests to steer the contract to STOP.
"This is one agency's testing," said Steve Chapin, vice president of government relations for 3M's electronic monitoring division. "We have the most widely used system in the world. It's been proven time and time and time again to be very safe and reliable."
In a heavily censored declaration, Milano also disclosed a test in which the 3M ankle monitor failed to "wake" from a battery-saving sleep mode, creating uncertainty about an offender's location. She cited the rest mode issue, along with what she described as a four-year history of other problems, as grounds to order parole agents in April 2012 to immediately replace every state-issued 3M monitor in California with one from STOP.
3M argued in court that GPS signals are blocked so frequently that no ankle monitor can really distinguish between accidental and deliberate interference. Its device triggers tamper alerts only when both GPS and cell signals are lost for more than two minutes, a feature even the company said is not foolproof.
"Neither 3M nor STOP can produce a device that will read the offender's mind to determine his or her intent, so the devices can only 'assume' that a tamper is intentional," 3M said.
A Sacramento County judge in February ruled that Milano had violated state contract laws, but he upheld her decision that 3M failed state standards.
Industry experts say the issues raised with 3M are not unique to that company, and problems with the state's monitoring system probably still exist.
Peggy Conway, editor of the Journal of Offender Monitoring, said every electronic monitoring system has blind spots and weaknesses.
"There is no one perfect product," she said.
See Also:
03/30/2013
By Paige St. John
One company's devices were deemed so unreliable that California ordered a complete switch to another firm's, citing 'imminent danger' to the public. A lawsuit ensued.
A little more than a year ago, California quietly began conducting tests on the GPS monitoring devices that track the movements of thousands of sex offenders.
The results were alarming.
Corrections officials found the devices used in half the state were so inaccurate and unreliable that the public was "in imminent danger."
Batteries died early, cases cracked, reported locations were off by as much as three miles. Officials also found that tampering alerts failed and offenders were able to disappear by covering the devices with foil, deploying illegal GPS jammers or ducking into cars or buildings.
The state abruptly ordered parole agents to remove every ankle monitor in use from north of Los Angeles to the Oregon border. In their place, they strapped on devices made by a different manufacturer — a mass migration that left California's criminal tracking system not operational for several hours.
The test results provide a glimpse of the blind spots in electronic monitoring, even as those systems are promoted to law enforcement agencies as a safe alternative to incarceration. The flaws in the equipment raise the question of whether the state can deliver what Jessica's Law (California Proposition 83 PDF) promised when voters approved it in 2006: round-the-clock tracking of serious sex offenders.
In a lawsuit over the state's GPS contracting, corrections attorneys persuaded a judge to seal information about the failures, arguing that test results could show criminals how to avoid being tracked and give parole violators grounds to appeal convictions.
The information, they warned, would "erode public trust" in electronic monitoring programs. The devices, they said, deter crime only if offenders believe their locations are being tracked every minute.
"The more reliable the devices are believed to be, the less likely a parolee may be to attempt to defeat the system," GPS program director Denise Milano wrote in a court statement.
State officials say the replacement devices have largely resolved the problems, but officials so far have refused to release test data showing what, if any, improvements were gained.
Through interviews and by comparing censored documents obtained from multiple sources, The Times was able to piece together most of what the state persuaded the courts to black out.
GPS tracking devices are designed to alert authorities if the wearer tampers with the device, tries to flee or strays too close to a school or other forbidden area. Currently, 7,900 high-risk California parolees and felons — most of them sex offenders or gang members — wear the devices strapped to their ankles.
The monitors work by picking up signals from GPS satellites and transmitting the location information by cellular networks to a central computer. Just like GPS devices used by drivers or hikers, the monitors can fail where buildings block signals or where cell reception is spotty.
But that is not the monitoring system's sole vulnerability: A Times investigation in February found that thousands of child molesters, rapists and other high-risk parolees were removing or disarming their tracking devices — often with little risk of serving time for it because California's jails are too full to hold them.
The state's testing was conducted as part of a winner-take-all contest for the nation's largest electronic monitoring contract, worth more than $51 million over six years. Industry experts said they were the most exhaustive field trials they had seen.
When statewide monitoring began in 2008, California split the work between a division of 3M Co. and Houston-based Satellite Tracking of People, or STOP. The 3M device was used to track some 4,000 parolees in all but six Southern California counties. STOP had the rest of the state, including Los Angeles.
When California later sought to switch to a single provider, 3M came in with the low bid.
For a week in late 2011, parole agents abused both companies' devices. They were dropped four feet onto concrete, wrapped in foil to block their signals and submerged as long as three hours in a swimming pool. Testers allowed batteries to run dead, cut ankle straps and traveled into areas beyond the reach of satellite and cellular phone signals.
Without revealing full details of the tests, officials declared 3M's devices so faulty that the state rejected the company's bid. When 3M protested, Milano began a second round of tests that she said showed 3M's ankle monitors posed a public safety emergency.
The state claimed that 3M's devices failed to meet 46 of 102 field-tested standards for the equipment, although the company said a fourth of the failures occurred because the state had not provided the phone numbers needed to send automated text alerts.
One agent who participated in the tests, Denise LeBard, said in a court statement that 3M's ankle monitors were "inundated with defects."
Among the problems: 3M's devices failed to collect a GPS location every minute, phone in that information every 10 minutes and forward a text message to a parole agent if a problem was detected. Without revealing how well STOP performed, the state said 3M collected only 45% of the possible GPS points.
Testers also were able to fool 3M's GPS devices by wrapping monitors in foil, something that triggers an alarm on STOP's device because it has a metal detector.
Engineers and experts within 3M's electronic monitoring division vigorously dispute the alleged faults. They accused California of rigging the tests to steer the contract to STOP.
"This is one agency's testing," said Steve Chapin, vice president of government relations for 3M's electronic monitoring division. "We have the most widely used system in the world. It's been proven time and time and time again to be very safe and reliable."
In a heavily censored declaration, Milano also disclosed a test in which the 3M ankle monitor failed to "wake" from a battery-saving sleep mode, creating uncertainty about an offender's location. She cited the rest mode issue, along with what she described as a four-year history of other problems, as grounds to order parole agents in April 2012 to immediately replace every state-issued 3M monitor in California with one from STOP.
3M argued in court that GPS signals are blocked so frequently that no ankle monitor can really distinguish between accidental and deliberate interference. Its device triggers tamper alerts only when both GPS and cell signals are lost for more than two minutes, a feature even the company said is not foolproof.
"Neither 3M nor STOP can produce a device that will read the offender's mind to determine his or her intent, so the devices can only 'assume' that a tamper is intentional," 3M said.
A Sacramento County judge in February ruled that Milano had violated state contract laws, but he upheld her decision that 3M failed state standards.
Industry experts say the issues raised with 3M are not unique to that company, and problems with the state's monitoring system probably still exist.
Peggy Conway, editor of the Journal of Offender Monitoring, said every electronic monitoring system has blind spots and weaknesses.
"There is no one perfect product," she said.
See Also:
- (03/30/2013) REDACTED: Alarming ankle monitor findings
- (04/04/2013) Lawmakers raise questions about GPS tracking program for sex offenders
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
WI - Use of GPS as tool to track sex offenders is investigated
Original Article
03/26/2013
By Mario Koran
In the 1960s, while studying under the famed behaviorist B.F. Skinner at Harvard University, Robert Gable and his brother designed the first electronic monitoring system. They hoped it would be used as a support system.
“It was supposed to be a pro-social tool,” Gable said in an interview, “a way for offenders and agencies to remain in contact and offer positive support.”
But with the development of newer forms of the technology, particularly Global Positioning System tracking, Gable has become uneasy. Tracking technology, he wrote in a 2009 report, has instead been used “almost exclusively as an information system to document rule violations.”
By 2008, at least 39 states required or authorized the use of electronic monitoring to track sex offenders, according to the nonprofit National Conference of State Legislatures. The group’s report said at least 11 states, including Wisconsin, require lifetime monitoring of some offenders.
In Wisconsin, GPS tracking is currently used to monitor more than 600 individuals, mostly sex offenders. Some of them say the technology is unreliable, resulting in their being returned to jail even in situations where they have not broken the rules.
The state Department of Corrections said it is unaware of problems with the technology. But it acknowledged that it does not track how often alerts result in offenders being jailed, and has never audited the performance of its GPS monitoring system, in use since 2007.
Gable estimates that 250,000 people are being electronically monitored in the United States, about one in 10 by GPS technology. More widely used is radio frequency monitoring, which tethers individuals to a base station inside their homes, effectively a form of house arrest. If they travel outside the perimeter without approval, authorities are notified.
And GPS vendors are seeking to significantly expand the use of GPS technology, by pitching their wares to authorities to monitor illegal immigrants, suspected gang members and even truant students.
How effective is GPS tracking? That is open to debate.
Bill Bales, principal investigator on a 2010 study funded by the National Institute of Justice, found that electronic monitoring — both radio frequency and GPS units were examined — could decrease recidivism by 31 percent.
“GPS can be a very effective tool,” he said in an interview.
But Gable thinks many agencies are using GPS devices as a means of “control and punishment,” rather than as a tool to help keep offenders on track.
“GPS tracking is an example of public fear that has been augmented by politicians who want to be tough on crime,” Gable said. “It’s a wayward technology that has become warped into a punishment routine.”
In particular, he argues that correctional officers should exercise careful discretion regarding whether and when GPS violations lead to reincarceration.
“It should not be a blanket policy,” Drake said. “A one-time ‘no-GPS’ event would be an inappropriate reason to send someone to jail. If it happens again and again, that might be something to look into.”
Although he is a proponent of GPS tracking, Drake said agencies should be aware of its limitations and set clear objectives. “I think a review on at least a yearly basis would be appropriate to make sure an agency is making progress toward those objectives,” he said.
Peggy Conway, editor of the Journal of Offender Monitoring, said correctional officers need to know “how the devices work and where they don’t work. They are the ones who need to distinguish between nuisance alerts — which waste police officers’ time and resources — and the alerts that need to be investigated.”
DOC spokeswoman Jackie Guthrie said GPS monitoring “is just one tool and is not intended to be a stand-alone. Its intention is to work in concert with other supervisory strategies.” She said the agency does check to make sure GPS equipment and systems are working properly.
Drake said that GPS technology, while improved, is not good at tracking offenders in high-rise buildings, subways, basements or large commercial structures such as shopping malls.
“To be used best, it needs to be used with a clear view of the sky, no clouds, wide open spaces,” Drake said. “We as people spend 90 percent of our time indoors, so there’s an immediate problem.”
BI’s website warns that the GPS signals sent by the devices can be lost due to rain or fog, in deep canyons or dense vegetation, near large or tall buildings, and “when the offender is riding in a car or other enclosed means of transportation.”
In 2010, BI suffered a nationwide electronic monitoring server crash, leaving authorities in 49 states unaware of the movements of offenders who were being tracked by GPS and other technology. In Wisconsin, police and correctional officers reportedly held about 140 sex offenders in jail throughout the state until the GPS tracking system was restored.
In 2007, a legislative study committee in Arizona measured the effectiveness of using GPS technology to track offenders. It found that the 140 offenders monitored that year experienced a total of 35,601 false alerts, due to problems such as low batteries or signals lost in dead zones.
The study group found 463 confirmed violations, meaning that false alerts outnumbered proven infractions by a 77-1 margin.
And a 2011 study of GPS technology by Sam Houston State University in Texas found a significant number of false alerts, triggered by equipment failures.
“GPS technology is far more limited than anticipated and should be viewed as a tool rather than depended upon as a control mechanism,” said one of the authors, Gaylene Armstrong, in a news release.
- Hey Mr. Suder, not everyone on the sex offender registry is a monster! It's thinking like this why people like you should not be allowed to be in politics, it's discrimination!
In fiscal year 2011-12, the state paid BI $4.2 million for services including GPS monitoring units, home monitoring units and electronic alcohol-detection units, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. The DOC was unable to say how much was specifically spent on GPS.
A provision in state law requires that offenders on GPS monitoring pay a fee for the devices. But the amount is based on the offender’s ability to pay, and even offenders who are not absolved of this responsibility are often delinquent. According to the Fiscal Bureau, less than $100,000 was collected during the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2012.
- Forcing someone to pay a fee for something they do not want but are forced to wear is extortion.
“I could have predicted that from the get-go,” said Bies, the corrections committee chairman. “Most of the people that you are involving (with GPS) are barely self-sufficient as it is.”
See Also:
03/26/2013
By Mario Koran
In the 1960s, while studying under the famed behaviorist B.F. Skinner at Harvard University, Robert Gable and his brother designed the first electronic monitoring system. They hoped it would be used as a support system.
“It was supposed to be a pro-social tool,” Gable said in an interview, “a way for offenders and agencies to remain in contact and offer positive support.”
But with the development of newer forms of the technology, particularly Global Positioning System tracking, Gable has become uneasy. Tracking technology, he wrote in a 2009 report, has instead been used “almost exclusively as an information system to document rule violations.”
By 2008, at least 39 states required or authorized the use of electronic monitoring to track sex offenders, according to the nonprofit National Conference of State Legislatures. The group’s report said at least 11 states, including Wisconsin, require lifetime monitoring of some offenders.
In Wisconsin, GPS tracking is currently used to monitor more than 600 individuals, mostly sex offenders. Some of them say the technology is unreliable, resulting in their being returned to jail even in situations where they have not broken the rules.
The state Department of Corrections said it is unaware of problems with the technology. But it acknowledged that it does not track how often alerts result in offenders being jailed, and has never audited the performance of its GPS monitoring system, in use since 2007.
Gable estimates that 250,000 people are being electronically monitored in the United States, about one in 10 by GPS technology. More widely used is radio frequency monitoring, which tethers individuals to a base station inside their homes, effectively a form of house arrest. If they travel outside the perimeter without approval, authorities are notified.
And GPS vendors are seeking to significantly expand the use of GPS technology, by pitching their wares to authorities to monitor illegal immigrants, suspected gang members and even truant students.
How effective is GPS tracking? That is open to debate.
Bill Bales, principal investigator on a 2010 study funded by the National Institute of Justice, found that electronic monitoring — both radio frequency and GPS units were examined — could decrease recidivism by 31 percent.
“GPS can be a very effective tool,” he said in an interview.
But Gable thinks many agencies are using GPS devices as a means of “control and punishment,” rather than as a tool to help keep offenders on track.
“GPS tracking is an example of public fear that has been augmented by politicians who want to be tough on crime,” Gable said. “It’s a wayward technology that has become warped into a punishment routine.”
Understanding the limitations
George Drake, president of Correct Tech LLC, an Albuquerque-based corrections technology consulting company, said agencies need to be mindful of the technology’s limitations.In particular, he argues that correctional officers should exercise careful discretion regarding whether and when GPS violations lead to reincarceration.
“It should not be a blanket policy,” Drake said. “A one-time ‘no-GPS’ event would be an inappropriate reason to send someone to jail. If it happens again and again, that might be something to look into.”
Although he is a proponent of GPS tracking, Drake said agencies should be aware of its limitations and set clear objectives. “I think a review on at least a yearly basis would be appropriate to make sure an agency is making progress toward those objectives,” he said.
Peggy Conway, editor of the Journal of Offender Monitoring, said correctional officers need to know “how the devices work and where they don’t work. They are the ones who need to distinguish between nuisance alerts — which waste police officers’ time and resources — and the alerts that need to be investigated.”
DOC spokeswoman Jackie Guthrie said GPS monitoring “is just one tool and is not intended to be a stand-alone. Its intention is to work in concert with other supervisory strategies.” She said the agency does check to make sure GPS equipment and systems are working properly.
Longstanding problems
In Wisconsin, GPS monitoring equipment and services are provided by Behavioral Interventions, or BI, a Colorado-based company. According to its website, the company has approximately 900 contracts with federal, state and local agencies.Drake said that GPS technology, while improved, is not good at tracking offenders in high-rise buildings, subways, basements or large commercial structures such as shopping malls.
“To be used best, it needs to be used with a clear view of the sky, no clouds, wide open spaces,” Drake said. “We as people spend 90 percent of our time indoors, so there’s an immediate problem.”
BI’s website warns that the GPS signals sent by the devices can be lost due to rain or fog, in deep canyons or dense vegetation, near large or tall buildings, and “when the offender is riding in a car or other enclosed means of transportation.”
In 2010, BI suffered a nationwide electronic monitoring server crash, leaving authorities in 49 states unaware of the movements of offenders who were being tracked by GPS and other technology. In Wisconsin, police and correctional officers reportedly held about 140 sex offenders in jail throughout the state until the GPS tracking system was restored.
In 2007, a legislative study committee in Arizona measured the effectiveness of using GPS technology to track offenders. It found that the 140 offenders monitored that year experienced a total of 35,601 false alerts, due to problems such as low batteries or signals lost in dead zones.
The study group found 463 confirmed violations, meaning that false alerts outnumbered proven infractions by a 77-1 margin.
And a 2011 study of GPS technology by Sam Houston State University in Texas found a significant number of false alerts, triggered by equipment failures.
“GPS technology is far more limited than anticipated and should be viewed as a tool rather than depended upon as a control mechanism,” said one of the authors, Gaylene Armstrong, in a news release.
Uncertain cost
In 2007, nine months after he signed a bill mandating lifetime GPS tracking for certain sex offenders, then-Gov. Jim Doyle proposed limiting tracking only to offenders on probation or parole, citing budgetary concerns. State Rep. Scott Suder, R-Abbotsford, warned that this would undercut “our ability to track these monsters.” In the end, Doyle, a Democrat, agreed to move forward with expanded tracking of these sex offenders.- Hey Mr. Suder, not everyone on the sex offender registry is a monster! It's thinking like this why people like you should not be allowed to be in politics, it's discrimination!
In fiscal year 2011-12, the state paid BI $4.2 million for services including GPS monitoring units, home monitoring units and electronic alcohol-detection units, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau. The DOC was unable to say how much was specifically spent on GPS.
A provision in state law requires that offenders on GPS monitoring pay a fee for the devices. But the amount is based on the offender’s ability to pay, and even offenders who are not absolved of this responsibility are often delinquent. According to the Fiscal Bureau, less than $100,000 was collected during the fiscal year that ended June 30, 2012.
- Forcing someone to pay a fee for something they do not want but are forced to wear is extortion.
“I could have predicted that from the get-go,” said Bies, the corrections committee chairman. “Most of the people that you are involving (with GPS) are barely self-sufficient as it is.”
See Also:
Sunday, March 24, 2013
WI - Lost signals, disconnected lives: Offenders raise concerns over reliability of GPS monitoring
Labels: Employment , GPS , Wisconsin
Original Article
03/23/2013
By Mario Koran
[name withheld #1] and [name withheld #2] were convicted of violent sex crimes and served many years in prison.
Now they are on parole, living in Madison neighborhoods, attending treatment groups and wearing global positioning system (GPS) ankle monitors — tracking that, under Wisconsin law, will continue for the rest of their lives.
But [name withheld #1], [name withheld #2] and 11 other offenders interviewed for this report say that Wisconsin’s GPS tracking system repeatedly fails, registering false alerts and landing the offenders in jail although they have done nothing wrong.
“There are times when I’m afraid to leave whatever room I’m in, even to go to the bathroom,” said [name withheld #1] 53, who served 26 years in prison for sexual assault and other crimes.
“I’m afraid an alert will go off and the police will show up at my door.”
On July 31, [name withheld #1] stood in his Madison bedroom with a Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism photographer. On several occasions, his GPS monitor began flashing, indicating he was out of range, even though [name withheld #1] was in his own home and well within boundaries determined by his parole agent.
Offenders and their advocates say GPS breakdowns waste taxpayers’ money with unnecessary police work and lockups, and hamper offenders’ efforts to restore relationships with their families and retain jobs.
Even the people who make the GPS technology acknowledge that signals can be lost due to weather conditions, tall buildings and car travel.
A key legislator, the chairman of the Assembly Committee on Corrections, said he was unaware of any problems with the state’s GPS monitoring system. But he was concerned by the Center’s findings, and said that an audit may be in order.
“Yes, I think it would be proper to inquire about the accuracy and effectiveness of our monitoring system if offenders are indeed experiencing these problems,” said state Rep. Garey Bies, R-Sister Bay.
But Bies, a former Door County sheriff’s deputy, added, “I really don’t have a whole lot of sympathy” for sexual offenders and whatever “inconvenience” they may have to endure.”
As of February, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections was using GPS technology to track 638 offenders. According to DOC spokeswoman Jackie Guthrie, “The majority are sex offenders with a very small number being offenders convicted of domestic violence or other violent crimes.” She was unable to provide a breakdown.
And GPS monitoring in Wisconsin is projected to expand by nearly 50 percent over the next two years.
A Wisconsin state law passed last April, set to take full effect in 2014, allows judges to require GPS tracking for offenders who violate a domestic abuse or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction.
Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed budget recommends $10 million in new funding for expanded use of GPS tracking in fiscal years 2014 and 2015 — to monitor 783 individuals the first year and 939 the second year.
Last September, an audit in Tennessee (PDF) revealed massive oversights in the state’s GPS offender tracking system. More than 80 percent of alerts from GPS-monitored offenders “were not cleared or confirmed” by corrections agents, including alerts triggered after individuals appeared to enter prohibited areas such as parks and schools.
The Wisconsin DOC insists its system, and the devices it leases from Colorado-based Behavioral Interventions, or BI, are reliable.
“We are not aware of any ‘problems’ with our GPS monitoring system, and have several protocols in place to ensure that the integrity of our system is maintained,” Guthrie wrote in an email.
BI spokeswoman Monica Hook maintained that GPS technology is “a reliable alternative to incarceration” and that millions of people have worn the devices over the years.
Yet, she conceded, “it’s a manmade device. There are certain things that we safeguard against, but nothing’s perfect.” She said the Wisconsin DOC has “discretion” to determine how to handle alerts.
The DOC rejected the Center’s request for records regarding its protocols for dealing with dropped signals or false GPS alerts, saying offenders could use this information to “defeat the monitoring device.”
Guthrie said the agency does not keep statistics on how many alerts are triggered for GPS offenders, and does not track how often these result in offenders being incarcerated.
The DOC, she said, also has not conducted audits or quality reviews of its GPS program, which began operating in 2007.
Tracked offenders wear anklets at all times. Those with older, two-piece models must carry a portable GPS device that communicates with satellites and sends data to a central monitoring center in Madison. One-piece models include this device in the anklet. The DOC says the two-piece models are being phased out.
If an offender crosses into a restricted “exclusion zone,” an alert is sent to the monitoring center, which can investigate the problem. “One of the outcomes,” Guthrie said, “could be an apprehension or arrest.”
[name withheld #3], convicted in 2001 of sexual assault of a child in Winnebago County, says challenges with his GPS unit have cost him jobs. In one of several discrimination complaints with the state Division of Equal Rights, he even has evidence.
In response to one such complaint, filed in 2011, an attorney for a company that chose not to hire [name withheld #3] for a particular job noted that his two-hour application process was disrupted four to six times by his GPS device. The attorney said this “indicate(d) a high level of potential for disruption in any assignment where the applicant could be placed.”
His attorney, Andrew Phillips, said the case was settled out of court to the “satisfaction of both parties.”
[name withheld #4], convicted of sexual assaults in 2005 and 2007 in Winnebago County, estimates he has been jailed six times due to problems with his GPS equipment and that he has lost “thousands of dollars” in missed work.
The Center was able to obtain some records on GPS alerts for individual offenders. They show that [name withheld #1] and [name withheld #2] triggered multiple alerts for “No GPS,” indicating their locations could not be tracked by satellite. In May alone, [name withheld #2] triggered 206 “No GPS” alerts.
Records show [name withheld #1] has been booked into Dane County Jail at least eight times since June 2011, serving a total of 29 days in jail, all for violations related to his GPS tracker.
In each of these cases, [name withheld #1] argues the violations occurred because of an innocent mistake, as when he went for a bike ride without bringing along a hand-held device, or despite the fact that he was complying with the rules.
For instance, on Sept. 19, [name withheld #1] was jailed for four days because “he failed to have a GPS signal” for much of a two-hour period. [name withheld #1] said he was attending an approved University of Wisconsin-Madison class. His English professor, Emily Auerbach, backs him up. “I know exactly where he was” during the time in question, she said.
[name withheld #2], 39, served 12 years for having intercourse with an unconscious woman. Records show he has been booked into jail at least a dozen times since April 2011 for violations related to his GPS monitor, spending a total of 74 days behind bars.
[name withheld #2] admits he forgot to bring his hand-held GPS tracker with him on two occasions. He left it in his car when he entered a supermarket and left it on a bus when traveling to work. But the other violations, he says, were over lost signals and false alerts.
On June 12, 2012, according to records obtained by his attorney, [name withheld #2] was at his wife’s house, an approved location. He said he left his tracker in an adjacent room, as he had done before without triggering alerts, while he watched a basketball game on television and did not hear it beep. He served a total of 51 days in jail, until after he signed an agreement admitting he “did fail to comply with the rules and conditions of GPS monitoring.”
“It’s almost like taking on a new normal,” [name withheld #2] said in an interview from the Dane County Jail in June, while jailed on this violation. “If you’re trying to move on with your life, and you’ve got these barriers, you just want to give up.”
[name withheld #2]’ attorney, Jessa Nicholson, thinks her client has done his best to reintegrate but has been unfairly punished: “I’ve spoken with his therapist, and she assessed him as posing no threat whatsoever.”
[name withheld #1], when not back in jail, lives with his elderly aunt on Madison’s north side. He paints, often giving his work away to Madison charities. He still takes a one-credit class at UW-Madison and works construction jobs part time.
And while [name withheld #1] acknowledges that his past actions have caused pain and deserve punishment, he thinks being on GPS monitoring conveys that he is “unworthy of life.” He said he hopes and prays “that I’m able to continue to withstand this.”
See Also:
03/23/2013
By Mario Koran
[name withheld #1] and [name withheld #2] were convicted of violent sex crimes and served many years in prison.
Now they are on parole, living in Madison neighborhoods, attending treatment groups and wearing global positioning system (GPS) ankle monitors — tracking that, under Wisconsin law, will continue for the rest of their lives.
But [name withheld #1], [name withheld #2] and 11 other offenders interviewed for this report say that Wisconsin’s GPS tracking system repeatedly fails, registering false alerts and landing the offenders in jail although they have done nothing wrong.
“There are times when I’m afraid to leave whatever room I’m in, even to go to the bathroom,” said [name withheld #1] 53, who served 26 years in prison for sexual assault and other crimes.
“I’m afraid an alert will go off and the police will show up at my door.”
On July 31, [name withheld #1] stood in his Madison bedroom with a Wisconsin Center for Investigative Journalism photographer. On several occasions, his GPS monitor began flashing, indicating he was out of range, even though [name withheld #1] was in his own home and well within boundaries determined by his parole agent.
Offenders and their advocates say GPS breakdowns waste taxpayers’ money with unnecessary police work and lockups, and hamper offenders’ efforts to restore relationships with their families and retain jobs.
Even the people who make the GPS technology acknowledge that signals can be lost due to weather conditions, tall buildings and car travel.
A key legislator, the chairman of the Assembly Committee on Corrections, said he was unaware of any problems with the state’s GPS monitoring system. But he was concerned by the Center’s findings, and said that an audit may be in order.
“Yes, I think it would be proper to inquire about the accuracy and effectiveness of our monitoring system if offenders are indeed experiencing these problems,” said state Rep. Garey Bies, R-Sister Bay.
But Bies, a former Door County sheriff’s deputy, added, “I really don’t have a whole lot of sympathy” for sexual offenders and whatever “inconvenience” they may have to endure.”
As of February, the Wisconsin Department of Corrections was using GPS technology to track 638 offenders. According to DOC spokeswoman Jackie Guthrie, “The majority are sex offenders with a very small number being offenders convicted of domestic violence or other violent crimes.” She was unable to provide a breakdown.
And GPS monitoring in Wisconsin is projected to expand by nearly 50 percent over the next two years.
A Wisconsin state law passed last April, set to take full effect in 2014, allows judges to require GPS tracking for offenders who violate a domestic abuse or harassment temporary restraining order or injunction.
Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed budget recommends $10 million in new funding for expanded use of GPS tracking in fiscal years 2014 and 2015 — to monitor 783 individuals the first year and 939 the second year.
'Nothing's perfect'
Significant concerns about the reliability of GPS tracking have arisen in at least seven other states. The technology has been found both to sound alerts in error and miss offenders’ transgressions when they do occur.Last September, an audit in Tennessee (PDF) revealed massive oversights in the state’s GPS offender tracking system. More than 80 percent of alerts from GPS-monitored offenders “were not cleared or confirmed” by corrections agents, including alerts triggered after individuals appeared to enter prohibited areas such as parks and schools.
The Wisconsin DOC insists its system, and the devices it leases from Colorado-based Behavioral Interventions, or BI, are reliable.
“We are not aware of any ‘problems’ with our GPS monitoring system, and have several protocols in place to ensure that the integrity of our system is maintained,” Guthrie wrote in an email.
BI spokeswoman Monica Hook maintained that GPS technology is “a reliable alternative to incarceration” and that millions of people have worn the devices over the years.
Yet, she conceded, “it’s a manmade device. There are certain things that we safeguard against, but nothing’s perfect.” She said the Wisconsin DOC has “discretion” to determine how to handle alerts.
The DOC rejected the Center’s request for records regarding its protocols for dealing with dropped signals or false GPS alerts, saying offenders could use this information to “defeat the monitoring device.”
Guthrie said the agency does not keep statistics on how many alerts are triggered for GPS offenders, and does not track how often these result in offenders being incarcerated.
The DOC, she said, also has not conducted audits or quality reviews of its GPS program, which began operating in 2007.
Tracked offenders wear anklets at all times. Those with older, two-piece models must carry a portable GPS device that communicates with satellites and sends data to a central monitoring center in Madison. One-piece models include this device in the anklet. The DOC says the two-piece models are being phased out.
If an offender crosses into a restricted “exclusion zone,” an alert is sent to the monitoring center, which can investigate the problem. “One of the outcomes,” Guthrie said, “could be an apprehension or arrest.”
'You just want to give up'
In all, the Center interviewed a dozen sex offenders, and one person convicted of stalking, who complained of problems with their tracking units.[name withheld #3], convicted in 2001 of sexual assault of a child in Winnebago County, says challenges with his GPS unit have cost him jobs. In one of several discrimination complaints with the state Division of Equal Rights, he even has evidence.
In response to one such complaint, filed in 2011, an attorney for a company that chose not to hire [name withheld #3] for a particular job noted that his two-hour application process was disrupted four to six times by his GPS device. The attorney said this “indicate(d) a high level of potential for disruption in any assignment where the applicant could be placed.”
His attorney, Andrew Phillips, said the case was settled out of court to the “satisfaction of both parties.”
[name withheld #4], convicted of sexual assaults in 2005 and 2007 in Winnebago County, estimates he has been jailed six times due to problems with his GPS equipment and that he has lost “thousands of dollars” in missed work.
The Center was able to obtain some records on GPS alerts for individual offenders. They show that [name withheld #1] and [name withheld #2] triggered multiple alerts for “No GPS,” indicating their locations could not be tracked by satellite. In May alone, [name withheld #2] triggered 206 “No GPS” alerts.
Records show [name withheld #1] has been booked into Dane County Jail at least eight times since June 2011, serving a total of 29 days in jail, all for violations related to his GPS tracker.
In each of these cases, [name withheld #1] argues the violations occurred because of an innocent mistake, as when he went for a bike ride without bringing along a hand-held device, or despite the fact that he was complying with the rules.
For instance, on Sept. 19, [name withheld #1] was jailed for four days because “he failed to have a GPS signal” for much of a two-hour period. [name withheld #1] said he was attending an approved University of Wisconsin-Madison class. His English professor, Emily Auerbach, backs him up. “I know exactly where he was” during the time in question, she said.
[name withheld #2], 39, served 12 years for having intercourse with an unconscious woman. Records show he has been booked into jail at least a dozen times since April 2011 for violations related to his GPS monitor, spending a total of 74 days behind bars.
[name withheld #2] admits he forgot to bring his hand-held GPS tracker with him on two occasions. He left it in his car when he entered a supermarket and left it on a bus when traveling to work. But the other violations, he says, were over lost signals and false alerts.
On June 12, 2012, according to records obtained by his attorney, [name withheld #2] was at his wife’s house, an approved location. He said he left his tracker in an adjacent room, as he had done before without triggering alerts, while he watched a basketball game on television and did not hear it beep. He served a total of 51 days in jail, until after he signed an agreement admitting he “did fail to comply with the rules and conditions of GPS monitoring.”
“It’s almost like taking on a new normal,” [name withheld #2] said in an interview from the Dane County Jail in June, while jailed on this violation. “If you’re trying to move on with your life, and you’ve got these barriers, you just want to give up.”
[name withheld #2]’ attorney, Jessa Nicholson, thinks her client has done his best to reintegrate but has been unfairly punished: “I’ve spoken with his therapist, and she assessed him as posing no threat whatsoever.”
'Unworthy of life'
Now [name withheld #2] works at Voices Beyond Bars, a Madison nonprofit that assists former inmates. He said he does well at Madison Area Technical College, where he attends classes. But last year, he missed a final essay for one class because he was back in jail on a GPS violation. His grades suffered, and he was placed on academic probation.[name withheld #1], when not back in jail, lives with his elderly aunt on Madison’s north side. He paints, often giving his work away to Madison charities. He still takes a one-credit class at UW-Madison and works construction jobs part time.
And while [name withheld #1] acknowledges that his past actions have caused pain and deserve punishment, he thinks being on GPS monitoring conveys that he is “unworthy of life.” He said he hopes and prays “that I’m able to continue to withstand this.”
See Also:
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Patty Wetterling questions sex offender laws
Labels: AdamWalshAct , Audio , CivilCommitment , DayCare , Disinformation , GPS , JohnWalsh , MarcKlaas , MassHysteria , MeganKanka , MegansLaw , OffenderChild , Park , PattyWetterling , Playground , Residency , School , Video
![]() |
| Patty Wetterling |
03/20/2013
By Jennifer Bleyer
The outspoken activist has a change of heart over the wide-reaching scope of laws she helped put into action
On an overcast spring day in 1996, a handful of people filed out of the Oval Office and assembled on the driveway of the White House before a scrum of reporters. They cast satisfied glances at the television cameras as birds chirped and a helicopter whirred nearby. Nothing except for the white memorial ribbons pinned to their lapels indicated the nature of their fateful connection to each other as the parents of children kidnapped by strangers and, in all but one case, viciously assaulted and murdered.
Standing together, they represented a grim who's who of notorious child abductions of the late 20th century. On one end was John Walsh, whose six-year-old son, Adam, was abducted from a department store in Hollywood, Florida, in 1981 and later discovered decapitated. Then there was Marc Klaas, the father of Polly Klaas, a 12-year-old girl who was kidnapped at knifepoint from her bedroom in Petaluma, California, in 1993 and whose body was found two months later in a shallow grave. In the middle were Rich and Maureen Kanka, whose seven-year-old daughter, Megan, was kidnapped, raped, and murdered in 1994 by a convicted sex offender living across the street from their home in New Jersey. At the front of the group was Patty Wetterling, the mother of Jacob Wetterling, an 11-year-old who was abducted at gunpoint near his home in St. Joseph, Minnesota, in 1989 and never found.
- Let's not forget that Mr. Walsh also dated Reve when she was underage, but he seems to ignore that fact.
There was a stoic, familial air between the parents, a soldier-like bond. Minutes earlier inside the Oval Office, they had watched President Bill Clinton sign legislation known as Megan's Law, named for Megan Kanka, that required states to release information about registered sex offenders to the public. The law was an amendment to the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Registration Act, which was part of a landmark violent crime bill in 1994 that required law enforcement in every state to maintain registries of convicted sex offenders and track where they lived after being released from prison. The original law gave states the option of whether to notify the community of a sex offender's presence. Two years later, Megan's Law said that they must.
But before long the victorious mood at the press conference abruptly shifted. After the group thanked legislators who'd helped shepherd the law through, some reporters mentioned challenges to its constitutionality. The parents grew defensive. John Walsh, whose son's murder had led him to become a renowned campaigner for children's safety and eventually the host of TV's America's Most Wanted, pushed himself before the microphones and raised his voice.
- It was never proven that his son was sexually assaulted, nor if the person who did it, which they claim was Ottis Toole, was a known or unknown sex offender. They also suspected Jeffrey Dahmer as well, but they settled with putting the blame on Mr. Toole.
"This is letting parents know that the fox is in the henhouse," Walsh said, jabbing a finger in the air. "We're sick of seeing these people get all the rights and our children and the parents not getting any rights. Believe me, I've hunted these people for nine years now. They're predators, they prey upon children — that's their business. We deserve to know these people are in our neighborhoods!"
- Mr. Walsh, in our opinion, is just angry, which is understandable, and is just wanting to avenge his sons death by punishing all ex-sex offenders for his sons death, even when it was never proven sex was even involved in his sons death. Not all of those on the sex offender registry are predators who prey on children, regardless of what he says.
Patty Wetterling, a petite woman with a neat chestnut bob, looked dismayed in her taupe skirt suit. She interjected, explaining gently that Megan's Law was the equivalent of warning children about a dog in their neighborhood that's known to bite, and adding that it was not about revenge but ultimately just one piece in a large puzzle whose goal was a safe society.
- Patty is the reasonable one among the group. John Walsh and Marc Klass are always foaming at the mouth when talking about sex offender laws.
"I do think it will have a positive effect," she said.
Several years later, Wetterling flew back to Washington for another press conference, this one announcing the most comprehensive proposed legislation ever to manage sex offenders. Again, she stood among a cohort of other parents who had suffered unspeakable tragedies.
The proposed law would set national standards for sex offender registration, establish civil commitment procedures for people deemed sexually violent predators, require the registration of kids as young as 14 who had committed sex offenses, and be applied even to people whose crimes predated the law and who had successfully completed their sentences.
- Punishing someone who has done their time and in which their crime was before the law came into being, is called an ex post facto law, and is unconstitutional.
By then, sex offender restrictions had mushroomed in a way that was starting to trouble Wetterling. In the years since Jacob's abduction, she had devoted her life to children's safety. But the more she learned about the nature of child sexual abuse, the more she felt like these laws simply didn't get to the root of the problem, and actually made it worse in ways that were hard for most people to grasp.
At the Washington press conference that day, members of the media sidled over to Wetterling to ask her for a comment about the proposed new law. In her earnest manner, she confessed to some misgivings.
"I do have a little bit of concern about it being retroactive," she admitted, "and that it's now going to register juveniles."
Later, on a glorious midsummer day in 2006, President George W. Bush was joined in the White House Rose Garden by lawmakers and victims' families, including John Walsh and his wife, Reve. The president delivered a triumphant speech. Then he sat down and signed the legislation known as the Adam Walsh Child Safety and Protection Act.
There are nearly 750,000 registered sex offenders in America today, up 23 percent from six years ago. Hundreds of millions of dollars are spent each year on registering, publicizing, tracking, and confining them. Since the Wetterling Act was passed in 1994, laws governing sex offenders have grown successively stricter and more far reaching. In many places, residency restrictions dictate that sex offenders cannot live within a certain distance from schools, playgrounds, daycare centers, parks, bus stops, and other places where children gather. Online registries broadcast the names and pictures of offenders, often without specifying the nature of their offenses. Juveniles treated as adults and labeled as sex offenders for acts involving other kids bear that stigma well into adulthood.
Virtually all the major laws regarding sex offenders have been passed in the wake of grisly, high profile crimes against kids and, like Megan's Law, they bear victims' names as somber memorials. The laws tend to fuel the impression that sex offenders are a uniform class of creepy strangers lurking in the shadows who are bound to attack children over and over again.
That's what Wetterling used to believe about sex offenders, too. Yet over the course of two decades immersed in the issue, she found her assumptions slowly chipped away. Contrary to the widely held fear of predatory strangers, she learned that abductions like Jacob's are extremely rare, and that 90 percent of sexual offenses against children are committed by family members or acquaintances. While sex offenders are stereotyped as incurable serial abusers, a 2002 Bureau of Justice study found that they in fact have a distinctly low recidivism rate of just 5.3 percent for other sex crimes within three years of being released from prison.
![]() |
| No Easy Answers |
These days, Wetterling is a 63-year-old grandmother with a warm smile, soft blue eyes, and a folksy manner. She's well known for her two campaigns for Minnesota's Sixth Congressional District, which she lost to Mark Kennedy in 2004 and Michele Bachmann two years later, as well as her personal story, which is deeply imprinted in the state's collective memory. Her eyes still gloss over with tears when she talks about Jacob.
She's less well known for having quietly emerged as perhaps the most unlikely voice questioning sex offender laws. Although she remains a prominent advocate for child safety — she is the board chair of the influential National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the director of the Minnesota Health Department's sexual violence prevention program — she has expressed gnawing doubts over the past several years about how we deal with sex offenders, a striking stance for someone who has been personally affected in such a devastating way.
"We have an intolerance for sexual violence, which I agree with," she said recently over coffee downtown. "People want a singular solution, and the solution that's been sold over the years is lock 'em up and throw away the key. But we've cast such a broad net that we're catching a lot of juveniles who did something stupid or different types of offenders who just screwed up. Should they never be given a chance to turn their lives around?"
She paused.
"They are very different than the man who took Jacob."
Long before Wetterling became a public figure, she was a stay-at-home mother in the small town of St. Joseph. On the evening of October 22, 1989, she and her husband, Jerry, went to a party celebrating a local arts festival that she chaired. Their 11-year-old son Jacob stayed at home with his best friend, Aaron Larson, along with their other son Trevor, 10, and their eight-year-old daughter, Carmen. Trevor called over to the arts festival party and asked permission for the three boys to go to a local convenience store, where they could rent a movie and buy soda. They got a neighbor girl to come babysit Carmen and took off on bikes.
The boys were riding home in the dark when a masked man emerged from a gravel driveway along a country road. Pointing a gun, he told the boys to lie down in a ditch, demanded to know their ages, then ordered first Aaron and then Trevor to run into the nearby woods or risk being shot. By the time the two boys caught up to each other and dared to peek back, Jacob and the gunman were gone.
For the Wetterling family, the weeks and months that followed were an agonizing blur. Dozens of county, state, and federal investigators flocked to St. Joseph in the effort to find Jacob. Throngs of firefighters and student volunteers combed the surrounding woods and cornfields.
It soon hit the national news: Peter Jennings on ABC reported, "the effect on Jacob's family has been obvious, but his kidnapping has also torn the tightly knit social fabric of the entire town." Pictures of Jacob, a handsome, tawny-haired boy, were plastered at truck stops, tollbooths, and convenience stores across the Midwest. Billboards and bumper stickers pleaded for information. Thousands of fruitless tips poured in.
Investigators regretfully shared that the most common motive in this kind of abductions was sexual, and they felt all but certain that this was the case with Jacob.
Patty was shocked. "Who would do that?" she thought. "Who would ever think of sexually violating a child?"
The sheriff's office worked with a correctional facility in nearby St. Cloud to catalog recently released sex offenders and painstakingly created a database detailing where they lived to track them down for questioning.
By January 1990, the number of leads had dwindled and the FBI withdrew most of the agents it had assigned to investigate Jacob's abduction. Even so, his family remained hopeful. They poured their energy into keeping him in the public's awareness. It wasn't until about a year after his disappearance that Patty began to think beyond her immediate desperation to find her son and mustered some energy to try to help others.
She'd been ruminating about the database of local sex offenders the police had compiled, and how helpful they said such a resource would have been immediately after the abduction to enable them to quickly locate and rule out suspects. Patty felt certain that the database was a valuable law enforcement tool that shouldn't be filed away in some dusty cabinet. In fact, she thought there should be something similar for police to access wherever a child is abducted.
Around that time, Gov. Rudy Perpich asked Patty to serve on a task force examining the problem of child abduction and exploitation in Minnesota. Cordelia Anderson, an expert on child sexual abuse prevention, was appointed to the same task force and remembers feeling amazed at how Wetterling was able to separate her emotion from public policy decisions.
"Despite the extreme characteristics of Jacob's case, which play into the scariest stereotype and are very, very rare, she somehow quickly went to trying to educate herself," Anderson says.
Half a dozen states already had sex offender registries, and in accordance with one of the task force's recommendations, Wetterling helped craft legislation that would implement one in Minnesota based on what was working elsewhere. Accessible only to law enforcement, it would carefully distinguish between offenders based on the number of offenses, victim's age, degree of violence, and amenability to treatment. It wasn't long after the state law passed in 1991 that Wetterling turned her sights on implementing something similar on the federal level, with powerful allies including former U.S. Sen. David Durenberger.
Senator Durenberger was from St. Cloud, four miles from where the Wetterlings lived, so the abduction had struck close to home for him. It was a matter of days after hearing about it on the news that he had driven over to meet the family for the first time and offer whatever help he could.
"There's nothing like coming into the middle of a tragedy that doesn't have an easy answer," he recalled. "Everybody is going, 'What can we do?'"
Durenberger stayed in contact with the family, dropping by every so often to slip a supportive note in their mailbox, and he eventually led the effort to pass federal legislation requiring every state to maintain a sex offender registry accessible to law enforcement, and to regularly verify offenders' addresses for 10 years to life depending on the severity of their crimes.
- The online registry is nothing more than an online vigilante phone book that many have used to target ex-offenders, or their families, for harassment or worse, and is why the online registry needs to be taken offline and used by police only!
Although Durenberger was out of the Senate when the law finally passed in 1994, he regarded it as a victory.
"Patty started the movement," Durenberger says. "Just a few people had the nerve to get out ahead of the problem and try to come up with a solution that could apply across the country. This was happening one kid at a time, one family at a time. If it had a potential preventable cause, than we ought to deal with it legislatively if we could. That was the imperative."
- As Rahm Emanuel once put it, "You never want to let a good crisis go to waste!" And this is exactly what many politicians do to help them look good to the sheeple of the country.
At the time, registration wasn't seen as a panacea for the problem of sexual abuse, nor a scarlet letter to be pinned on all sex offenders. As far as Wetterling was concerned, the registry was just something that would make it easier for the police to locate former offenders.
"I think [she] intended for registration to fill a gap in public safety," Anderson says. "The whole movement to register juveniles or to lump all who commit any kind of offense into something they can never in their lifetime shake was not the intent. I don't think anybody foresaw that it would turn into what it's become."
In 2008, Wetterling received a missive in the mail. "My name is Ricky and I'm a 19-year-old Registered Sex Offender," it began:
"One night, when I was only 16, I met a girl at a teen club who told me she was almost 16, and we hit it off. She and I dated for a few weeks, but because of some issues at home, she ran away. The friend she was staying with told her to tell the police we had sex, and that she was too scared to go home because she was pregnant. When questioned by the police, I told the truth, I said "yes we had sex twice." The police informed me she was only 13. I was charged with two felony counts of Sexual Abuse 3rd degree and tried as an adult. Now because of the laws regarding the age of consent I am a Registered Sex Offender. Things for me, as well as my family, have changed dramatically and our lives have been shattered."
Wetterling was dumbfounded. She had never imagined her idea being used against someone like this.
"It just makes no sense to me," she says. "The design of the law was not to punish kids for being kids. He thought she was 16, and she lied."
- And yet that is exactly what it's doing!
Wetterling found herself questioning not only cases of juvenile sex offenders like Ricky, but also adults who had clearly committed harm but still didn't seem to warrant the kind of permanent pariah status that registration conferred.
One woman contacted Wetterling to share the story of her husband, a former alcohol abuser who had committed a sex crime when he was 19. He went to jail and afterward turned his life around, getting married and having two kids. The Adam Walsh Act retroactively forced him to register as a sex offender, ushering him into a deep depression. He could no longer sit with his own family at church or chaperone school field trips due to the law's provisions.
Wetterling also met a biochemist and college professor who had been caught molesting his stepdaughter. In addition to his prison sentence, he successfully completed treatment as well as a reunification program with his family and was judged rehabilitated by those who knew him. Yet the unforgiving rules of his status as a registered sex offender eventually pushed him into unemployment, homelessness, and a rootless life at the fringe of society.
She kept coming back to the same nagging feeling: These men were not the same as the man who abducted Jacob. These were not serial child abusers who had no capacity to change, and in a terrible twist, their status as sex offenders might actually make children less safe instead of more. Clogging the registries with so many people who don't represent a real ongoing threat could make it harder to discern those who actually do. Moreover, by perpetuating the stranger-danger myth, the laws could be lulling parents into a false sense of security, blinding them to the much more likely threat of sexual abuse by family and friends. Wetterling started feeling that sex offender laws had simply gone too far.
"We've caught a lot of people in the net who could have been helped," she says. "We've been elevating sex offender registration and community notification and punishment for 20-some years, and a wise and prudent thing would be to take a look at what's working. Instead we let our anger drive us."
To those who support the expansion of sex offender laws, Wetterling's concern for offenders can seem naive and misguided. After his daughter's rape and murder, Marc Klaas became a vocal supporter of stiffer penalties and stricter post-prison monitoring of offenders. He founded an organization, KlaasKids, whose mission is "to protect America's children from the predators who lurk in our shadows," according to its website, and endorses both Megan's Law and the Adam Walsh Act.
- And how many children has his organization saved?
"My feelings for Patty are very warm, but I think she's wrong," Klaas says. "I don't think the system is out to punish innocent people. These are people who've existed in anonymity for thousands of years and now we're finding out who they are, and they're whining about it."
- Because you are blinded by your hate and anger, of course you will disagree with her. What if your own son was slapped with the sex offender label?
Wetterling is quick to say that she still supports registries as a law enforcement tool and believes in civil commitment for some offenders who are truly too dangerous to live in society. Yet she has a fundamental disagreement with the other victims' families.
"We just view the problem differently," she says. "I have a tremendous amount of respect for what John and Reve Walsh have done, and I used to sit down with Marc Klaas to have a drink or six. We've undergone a shared experience, and I'm never going to tell a parent the way they're dealing with it is wrong or the way I'm dealing with it is right. I just think some of this really angry, punitive stuff is letting the bad guys win. They're building a world that isn't caring and believing in one another. That's not who I am."
Inside a hotel ballroom in downtown Atlanta a few years ago, Wetterling stood at a podium and held a crowd of 1,300 people at rapt attention. She cleared her throat and told the story she's told hundreds of times, the story of Jacob's abduction. She talked about her determination to help prevent child sexual abuse, not just punish it, and about her resistance to simplistic solutions to a complicated problem.
Among those listening to her address the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, a national organization dedicated to preventing sexual abuse, was Joan Tabachnick, a co-chair of the organization's prevention committee.
"I think almost everybody in that audience was in tears because of the vulnerability she's able to show, speaking about the horrific experience she's had, as well as how she's translated that into public policy," Tabachnick recalls. "It's amazingly courageous to ask what can we do to prevent this given that there are so many other parents who don't want anything to do with what she's saying."
Wetterling approaches the issue of sexual abuse prevention with the same sense of complexity and nuance that she brings to her understanding of who sex offenders are. To help keep them from reoffending, she believes we need to aid their success with housing, employment, counseling, and social support, all of which the current system does much to dissuade.
"There's a whole bunch else that needs to happen," Wetterling says. "We can't just keep locking them up, putting satellite monitoring on them, registering them for life. That doesn't change the problem."
Wetterling is also focused on primary prevention — that is, stopping abuse from happening in the first place. It's a bitter irony that almost all our public funds are funneled into punishing known sex offenders and virtually none are aimed at preventing sexual abuse from happening in the first place. Waiting until a child is harmed, hoping to find out about it, and then reacting with vengeance might satisfy the public's bloodlust and win points for politicians, but it's not a strategy that actually protects kids.
- What about educating the kids in schools about sexual abuse, and parents as well? I don't see many people talking about that, except maybe Erin Merryn.
Yet a growing number of clinicians, researchers, activists, and public health officials are turning their focus to primary prevention, which means examining risk factors, protective factors, and even the neurological origin of why some adults may be sexually drawn to children.
- This has been around since the dawn of time. People have weird fantasies! Just like those who are into S&M, bondage, homosexuality, etc.
For Wetterling, primary prevention also means taking a broad, holistic view of what's happening in our culture. She rues the effects of a porn-soaked, over-sexualized culture on young people and espouses teaching children about healthy relationships and appropriate behavior starting at an early age.
It's a testament to her preternatural faith in the power of prevention that she sees even her own son's abductor as someone whose vile behavior might have been averted. In 1999, on the 10th anniversary of Jacob's disappearance, Patty wrote an open letter to his kidnapper:
"I have found some comfort picturing you not as a mean old, ugly, bad guy, but at one time, you were an eleven year old boy," she wrote. "Someone's son...possibly someone's brother needing and hopefully sharing the love an 11-year-old boy deserves. If this love wasn't shared in your family, I'm sorry. Every child is entitled to the love and caring that family and friends provide."
She kept a list of questions she was desperate to ask next to the phone in case the abductor called: Why did you do it? Why Jacob? Where is he? But he never called.
Wetterling still harbors hope that Jacob is alive and will return to her someday. In the meantime, she spends her life thinking about what can be done to help children right now — those who might be victimized, as well as those who might grow up to become victimizers someday.
"We can spend the rest of our years talking about how to manage sex offenders," she says. "But wouldn't it be better if we could quit growing them? That's the bigger problem."
Subscribe to:
Posts
(
Atom
)



+web.jpg)










