Advertise your website below and on the left of our blog today

  • Is that a Sexual Predator hiding behind that badge? (08/16/2013)
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
  • Click for more info
Support us today by using the donation links on the left
Showing posts with label 14YearsOld. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 14YearsOld. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

NJ - 14-Year-Old New Jersey Girl To Register As Sex Offender After Posting Nude Photos On Myspace?

Original Article

02/18/2013

By Evan Bleier

A 14-year-old New Jersey girl is facing child pornography charges for posting almost 30 nude photos of herself on MySpace. If she is convicted, the girl may have to register as a sex offender.

According to The Daily News, this case is just one example of a larger effort by law enforcement officials across the country to crack down on child pornography. Prosecutors now routinely bring charges resulting from kids sending nude photos to one another over cell phones and e-mail. This case may be unique in that it is the first one where charges were filed based on a teen posting photos on a social networking site.

The explicit posting was brought to the attention of law enforcement by The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. MySpace has yet to comment on the matter. The company does have an internal team that is supposed to review image postings but it appears they may have missed this one.

After the Passaic County Sherriff’s Office began their investigation, the photos that they discovered online were “very explicit.” The sheriff’s spokesman, Bill Maer, said that girl posted the photos of herself because she wanted her boyfriend to be able to see them. “We consider this case a wake-up call to parents,” Maer said.

After officially being charged with possession of child pornography and distribution of child pornography, the girl was released into the custody of her mother. The girl’s name has not been made public because of her age.

If the girl is found guilty of the distribution charge, she would have to register with the state as a sex offender because of the provisions set forth by Megan’s Law. She would also be facing up to 17 years in prison.

No matter what happens, it sounds as if this case is a first.

I’m not sure I’ve seen a prosecution like this coming out of a social networking site,” said Seth Kreimer, a constitutional law professor at the University of Pennsylvania.


Saturday, January 5, 2013

PA - 2 Westmoreland Co. Teens Charged Under New Law Regulating Sexting

Original Article

01/03/2013

GREENSBURG (KDKA) — Two Greensburg Salem Middle School students are among the first to be charged under a new state law that regulates sexting among teens.

A 13-year-old girl took a photo; she was naked from the waist up, took a picture of herself and sent it to a 14-year-old boy at his request,” said Detective Sgt. Henry Fontana, of Greensburg Police.

The boy deleted the photo and did not forward it to friends. It was the girl’s mother who later found the photo on her phone and called police.

Under the new law that just went into effect on Christmas Eve, that is a summary offense,” said Detective Sgt. Fontana.

The new law creates a tiered system for adjudicating sexting cases that differentiates between those who make bad decisions and those who have bad intentions.

Under the new law, minors over the age of 12 charged for the first time will get a summary citation. A second offense will result in a misdemeanor charge.

Felony child pornography laws remain on the books and could still apply if the photos are distributed with malicious intent.

Attorney Anthony Bompiani, who does not represent anyone involved in the Greensburg Salem case, says this is important for young people who may make a bad decision without realizing the potential consequences.

Now with the times and the technology and the way students interact between each other, they make mistakes, they make bad judgment calls, stupid calls; and instead of having a felony record, they’re going to have a summary offense, which is going to be like a traffic ticket – won’t be on the record, it won’t affect them later in life,” said Bompiani.

The law also provides an important tool for police who previously had no alternative to a child pornography charge when dealing with less serious sexting cases.

It’s still wrong, it’s still against the law and the kids need to know that, but this makes it a little easier to cope with,” said Detective Sgt. Fontana.



Friday, December 14, 2012

IL - Teens confess to crimes they didn't commit

Original Article

12/07/2012

The Chicago Police Department is now the subject of a federal Justice Department investigation into its interrogation practices in at least one case that dates back more than 25 years, 60 Minutes has learned. The case involves juveniles who were as young as 14 years old. Now, after serving lengthy jail times, they tell Byron Pitts they were picked up on the streets, isolated from their parents and in some cases held for days by the police, who they say forced false confessions from them under harsh interrogations. Pitts' report will be broadcast on 60 Minutes, Sunday, Dec. 9 at 7:00 p.m. ET/PT.

"Everything in that confession was fed to us, and myself and my co-defendants by the police," [name withheld] tells Pitts. He signed a 21-page confession in 1994 admitting to a murder and rape of a 30-year-old prostitute that resulted in a 30-year sentence.

"You are being cuffed up and beat on by the police...they can get you to do what they want you to do,'' says [name withheld], who would sign a confession in another case that resulted in being jailed for more than 19 years.

Defense attorneys point out that Chicago has had twice as many false confession cases that have been documented than any other city in the country. This year seven men, including [name withheld] and [name withheld], were exonerated by a Chicago court of murder and rape charges. It was charged that Chicago police may have coerced confessions out of some of them when they were teenagers. Those men are now free and were given certificates of innocence, but not before they had spent nearly 20 years in jail for crimes they did not commit.

This happens all too often in Chicago, says Peter Neufeld, the co-founder of the Innocence Project. "Quite simply, what Cooperstown is to baseball, Chicago is to false confessions. It is the Hall of Fame," Neufeld says. "There are more juvenile confessions in Chicago than anyplace else in the United States...It's not because the kids are different...it's because of the way the police keep pounding and pounding and pounding away in those interrogation rooms," he tells Pitts.

Former Cook County Prosecutor Bob Milan says for the first time that he is now convinced some of the convictions his office made were based on false confessions obtained by Chicago Police. "I didn't believe people would confess to rape and murder of a woman. You know, just didn't believe it," Milan tells Pitts. "But based on my experiences, I found it did happen."

It happened in [name withheld]'s case, one Milan was involved in as a young prosecutor. [name withheld] and his teenage defendants, [name withheld] and [name withheld], were convicted and sentenced to life in prison based on false confessions obtained by the police.

Milan says it still haunts him that he did not examine the confessions given by some of the defendants at the time -- confessions that resulted in their convictions.

"These young men lost a lot of good lives. I was part of it, I didn't mean it, I never would have done that intentionally, but it doesn't make it any easier," he tells Pitts. "There's nothing worse as a prosecutor than playing a role in sending an innocent person or people to prison for many years. There's nothing worse."

Cook County State's Attorney Anita Alvarez tells Pitts that she is aware of the federal investigation into one of the cases and is cooperating with their probe. Recently she has established a new unit within her office to re-examine questionable prosecutions, but defends the action of the police in these cases. "We have not uncovered any evidence of any misconduct, by the police officers or the state's Attorneys, that took the statements in these cases,'' she says.



Tuesday, December 11, 2012

TX - Record interrogations: Reduce false confessions

Original Article

12/10/2012

CBS News' 60 Minutes last night had a disturbing story on the subject of false confessions, honing in on police interrogation of juveniles in Chicago, which the story called the nation's false confession capital. In a bizarre twist, a Chicago prosecutor insisted she believed in the guilt of exonerated defendants even after DNA had cleared them and implicated a convicted rapist. She suggested the rapist who's DNA was discovered (who is now deceased) coincidentally wandered by an open field after the fact and had sex with the corpse of a 14 year old, AFTER the boys who'd confessed had committed the deed. The courts disagreed, though, based on a close analysis of the recorded confessions, and released them with an accompanying finding of actual innocence.

The story reminded me Grits failed to link to a recent story from the Texas Tribune about proposed legislation by state Sen. Rodney Ellis to require police to record custodial interrogations, which was one of the recommendations of the Timothy Cole Advisory Panel on Wrongful Convictions that the Texas Lege failed to act on last session. Critics of the bill rely on several highly questionable claims, but once you get past red herrings about cost and logistics, it comes down to these two: Criminals might "get off" if unrecorded confessions are suppressed and jurors would not understand often-aggressive interrogation techniques that may lead to an eventual confession.



Saturday, April 21, 2012

OH - The state of Ohio is still ruining kids lives before they even start!

Original Article

This is just insane! 20 or so years ago this was called "growing up" now it's a crime. At most, they should have been suspended for a couple days, not ruined for life! And I cannot believe parents are so darn clueless and ignorant!

04/21/2012

SPRINGBORO - The 14-year-old boy charged with rape after having consensual sex with a 12-year-old girl is out of juvy and back home with his parents. But the young man's problems extend far beyond the charge.

Parents are appalled the pair was able to sneak out of class at Springboro Junior High to have sex in the bathroom.

"It was a stupid mistake," said Annette White, a mother of three children.

But now the boy is charged with rape. If convicted he could be committed to the Department of Youth services until he's 21. He would also have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.
- Why is it always the males problem?  If it was consensual, and both agreed, then why isn't both charged with a crime?  They both had sex with an underage child!  Although, like I said at the top, this is insanity and they should not be ruined for life because of being kids!

"I think they're too young. I think it was a mistake. Kids having sex at that age is awful really. But I don't think he should have to register as a sex offender. That will be with him for life," said Annette's husband, David White

"It's awful because his life is ruined forever. Once you place that strong a label, you can't go back," said grandmother Sandy Hays

The Warren County prosecutor says the sex was 100% consensual. But Ohio law says anyone under the age of 13 years old is unable to consent. It doesn't matter that the boy is only 14 since the girl is 12. But most parents disagree. They believe a school suspension for both children would be a more appropriate punishment.
- Yes, and since that is an insane law, why aren't both being charged with a crime?  They both broke the law!

"I think we need to look more closely at things that can ruin children's lives," said grandfather Tim Hays.

"There are some really bad sex offenders and this isn't. This isn't," agreed Sandy.

The boy will in juvenile court for his preliminary hearing on April 25th.


Video Link

Other Kids Ruined For Life Around The Country:

Playlist Link


Thursday, April 5, 2012

UK - This 14-Year-Old Sex Tape Producer Should Be Thankful He’s Not American

Original Article

04/04/2012

By Slade Sohmer

It’s downright impossible to keep teenagers away from Internet porn. Even with safeguards, filters and education, it’s always just one Google search on a friend’s computer away. And with the prevalence of such pornography via modern technology comes a warped perception of sex.

One only has to take a cursory glance at the news to find the Helen Lovejoy-esque freakouts about SEXTING, and junk shots and self-taken mirror pics and group action. But, after jumping the snark, perhaps these “Won’t somebody please think of the children?!” moments have a point. Armed with the trappings of modern technology, kids today may not be hornier than ever, nor doing more damage than ever to their sexual health, but the long-term consequences of their actions have a reach and permanence like never before in history.

The latest such high-profile example of this comes from Cheltenham, England, where a 14-year-old boy has been arrested after posting to Facebook a brief clip of himself and a 14-year-old girl engaging in an unspecified sex act (it’s unclear if it was just a clip or whether the whole thing lasted just a few pumps). The sex was consensual, all parties agree. The boy got off … lightly. Rather than ruin the mini-pornographer’s life with the scarlet letter of the sex offender registry, police gave him a “final warning,” which means it’ll all be expunged from his record in six years, barring any additional indecent incident.

Surely the girl’s father may have a word (or a fist-to-jaw conversation) with this unnamed sextaper. Surely there will be giggles as he walk the halls of his school. Surely girls may think twice about a sexual rendezvous with him. But at least he won’t be branded a sexual predator for life, be forced to go door-to-door in new neighborhoods and disclose to universities and employers he’s a marked man.

And, for that, we say “cheers, mates.”

Teenagers, even the most mature, are shortsighted idiots when it comes to sex. But sex offender laws in the United States do not allow for youthful indiscretions. We’re not only talking jail time, but the other such measures: not being allowed to finish to high school, not being able to enter parks, not being able to go to sporting events, not being allowed near a library, having your picture and address posted on the Internet. Forever shunned by society. Just think what that does to a person. It’s cruel and unusual.

There are actual sexual predators out there. There are people who rape children. There are people who sexually assault women. There are very bad people who do very bad things all over the country. These criminals need to pay for what they’ve done. They deserve these harsh punishments.

In America, we tell kids they’re in possession of “child porn if they own a yearbook which shows a boy’s hand down the pants of a fellow high schooler. In America, we throw eighth graders on the sex offender registry for life for aggressive (albeit, yes, deviant) horseplay. In America, we bestow Forever Pervert status on teenagers who just wanna show off what they’re working with via text. In America, we brand 19-year-olds as lifetime rapists for sleeping with their 16-year-old high-school sweethearts, and even if that man married the woman and raised four kids together, he still has to wear that crown of thorns.

Why? Because it makes us feel better? Because we’re so uneasy about morality that we need to make it about legality? Because it’s easier to codify a set of harsh penalties in black and white than deal with the gray areas? Hopefully we can look elsewhere, like Cheltenham, for guidance.



Sunday, February 5, 2012

Give child offenders chance at rehabilitation

Original Article

02/04/2012

By LucyLu

(NewDesignWorld Press Center) - Last summer, Andrew, a 14-year-old boy from Pennsylvania, engaged in inappropriate behavior that put him before a juvenile court judge. Andrew (a pseudonym) pressed his bare buttocks against the face of a 12-year-old boy, against the 12-year-old's will. In juvenile court, the judge decided that Andrew's actions qualified as aggravated indecent assault, a sexually violent offense.

If the Virginia General Assembly passes Senate Bill 127 or House Bill 624 as either bill looks today, a Virginia child in Andrew's shoes would probably be required to register as a sex offender and remain on the registry for at least 15 years — possibly for the rest of his life. The child would be required to re-register every 90 days and to be photographed every two years. If he failed to re-register, he would be committing a felony. The only significant difference between the bills is that the Senate bill allows for the juvenile to be listed on a private, law-enforcement-only registry.

Both of these bills are intended to bring Virginia into compliance with the federal Adam Walsh Act (AWA) and its section on sex-offender registration, known as SORNA (Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act).

Virginia should not move in the direction of treating child offenders the same as adult offenders. Instead, the state should stand by its commitment to offer young offenders a chance at rehabilitation and reintegration into society. The Virginia Rules website hosted by the Office of Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli describes this commitment well: "There is a juvenile justice system that treats juveniles differently than adults because our society believes juveniles are different from adults, both in terms of level of responsibility and potential for rehabilitation. Although there is concern with public safety and holding juvenile offenders accountable for their actions, there is greater emphasis on rehabilitation than on punishment in the juvenile justice system. 'Rehabilitation' means to restore someone to a useful life through therapy and education."

Current law in Virginia related to juvenile sex offenders recognizes that young offenders should be treated differently than adults. Judges already have the discretion to place a young offender over age 13 on a registry, but only after taking into account things such as the age and maturity of the young offender, the degree of use of force, prior criminal history, and other aggravating and mitigating factors. SB127 and HB624 take away that discretion.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently discussed the difference between adults and young offenders in the case of Graham v. Florida. The court found that the sentence of life without parole for young offenders who have committed non-homicide-related offenses violates the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment. In its decision, the court noted the "fundamental differences between juvenile and adult minds" and that the actions of a juvenile are less likely to be caused by an "irretrievably depraved character." While young offenders, the court noted, are not necessarily absolved of responsibility for their actions, their acts were simply not as "morally reprehensible as that of an adult."

Internationally, the distinction between punishing adults and children is also well established. The Convention on the Rights of the Child, an international treaty ratified by every country in the world save the United States and Somalia, states that every child accused, brought before a judge, or convicted of an offense should be "treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of the child's sense of dignity and worth," taking into account "the child's age and the desirability of promoting the child's reintegration and the child's assuming a constructive role in society."

Other U.S. states have rejected the idea of prolonged or lifetime registration for young offenders. Both Texas and New York have chosen not to comply with the registration provisions of the Adam Walsh Act. In its letter to the Justice Department explaining why, Risa Sugarman of New York's Office of Sex Offender Management wrote: "New York has a long-standing public policy of treating juvenile offenders differently from adult offenders so that juveniles have the best opportunity of rehabilitation and reintegration. The federal requirement that juveniles be placed on the Sex Offender Registry under AWA is in direct conflict with that public policy."

Also, certain states have achieved compliance with SORNA without requiring prolonged or lifetime registration. Maryland, for example, has created a system of registration for young offenders that sets time limits, allows them to petition for removal from the registry, and automatically removes them from any registries at the age of 21. This system, according to the Justice Department, complies with the AWA.

Virginia legislators shouldn't turn away from the state's sensible policies. They should closely study the issue of AWA compliance and the effect it would have on the young offender and on society as well. Legislators should not pass any law that would hold a 14-year-old to the same level of culpability and stigma as an adult.

Antonio M. Ginatta is the advocacy director for the U.S. Program of Human Rights Watch.


Tuesday, December 20, 2011

MO - Missouri Boy, 14, With Down Syndrome Suspended for Allegedly Sexually Harassing Bus Aide

Original Article

This is what happens when you have zero tolerance laws, and the media continues to spread fear over the sex offender hysteria, innocent kids get ruined and potentially labeled "sex offenders!" Watch the video at the above link.

12/20/2011

By Joshua Rhett Miller

A 14-year-old Missouri boy with Down syndrome whose mother says he “gives people hugs all the time” has been suspended from middle school for allegedly sexually harassing a bus aide, a school official told FoxNews.com.

Desi Mayberry, Central R-III School District superintendent, told FoxNews.com that Aleczander Tate Scott, of Park Hills, Mo., grabbed an unidentified female bus aide while aboard a school bus last Wednesday and imitated a "sexual act" while on top of the woman, who is no longer considering pressing charges for sexual harassment.

"He grabbed her around her waist, like a bear hug, and then he gets on top of her and moves in a sexual motion, imitating a sexual act," Mayberry said.

The aide then "screamed for help," leading the school bus driver to separate the boy and the aide, Mayberry said. The incident led to a "short-term" suspension for Scott, according to Mayberry, who declined to indicate exactly how many days the boy was banned from school.

Mayberry said all of the district's buses have security cameras, but added that the boy's mother, Tonia Fujimoto, was not allowed to see the footage of the alleged incident despite her requests, citing district policy.

Fujimoto told FoxNews.com on Tuesday that her son has been out of school since last Thursday. His suspension will last through Jan. 5, she said. She vehemently disputed the allegations.

"The teachers and the administrators are not educated on children with developmental disabilities and they don't want to be educated on them," she said. "All they want to do is push them out of their doors."

Fujimoto said her son doesn't understand why he is being kept out of school.

"How can you put a sexual harassment charge against someone who doesn't understand sexuality? It doesn't really take my faith of people away, but it reminds me of the ignorance in this world," she said.

Fujimoto said she has since requested that Aleczander be transferred to another nearby school district, a request she said administrators have approved pending his acceptance. She has consulted an attorney regarding possible juvenile charges to be filed against her son, she said.

"I still want to see the tape, but I'm more worried about what charges might be brought against him," she said. "And how do you explain to him that he can't go to school?"


Thursday, August 18, 2011

The false hope of sex offender registries

Original Article

08/18/2011

By Steve Chapman

An effort to combat predators comes up empty

At age 14, J.L. impregnated his girlfriend in a consensual encounter. This was bad news on several grounds, the worst being that she was 15 months younger. Convicted of rape for having sex with a 12-year-old, he will have to register as a sex offender — for the rest of his life.

Last month, the South Dakota Supreme Court upheld the verdict, while admitting that it made little sense. "Application of the first-degree rape statute to the present facts does not create an unintended absurdity," the justices concluded. The absurdity must have been deliberate.

J.L. isn't the only person to be ensnared by ridiculous interpretations of laws affecting sex offenders. A Michigan man convicted in 1984 of rape was supposed to report his home address to police after getting out of prison in 2002. Being homeless, he tried to comply by providing the address of a homeless shelter where he got his meals.

Not good enough, said the Michigan Supreme Court a few weeks ago. It said he can be sent back to jail for failing to file the address of whatever spot he laid his head each night.

Sex offender registries once sounded like an urgent necessity. They came in reaction to publicized crimes in which children died at the hands of convicted sex offenders. One of the most shocking involved a 7-year-old New Jersey girl, Megan Kanka, who in 1994 was raped and strangled by a paroled child molester living across the street from her home.

New Jersey enacted "Megan's Law," subjecting sex offenders to registration and community notification, so police and citizens would be aware of known risks. Today, all 50 states maintain registries and make at least some of the information available to the public.

But this was a reasonable notion that has been damaged by indiscriminate expansion. It's one thing to notify neighbors when a serial rapist moves in. Many states, however, lump frisky teens in with violent adults. Others, reports Jacob Sullum in Reason magazine, include mopes who were caught trolling for prostitutes or urinating in public.

Some states also put broad curbs on where convicted sex offenders may live. In Miami, many of them have taken up residence under a causeway for lack of an alternative. This outcome may not warrant sympathy, but it makes it harder for police and citizens to keep tabs on them.

Such flaws would be of minimal consequence if the laws served to prevent crime. The surprising revelation is they don't.

A 2008 report funded by the U.S. Justice Department found the original Megan's Law in New Jersey to be a nonevent. The policy, researchers documented, "showed no demonstrable effect in reducing sexual re-offenses" and "has no effect on reducing the number of victims involved in sexual offenses." The zero effect had a cost above zero — nearly $4 million annually for the 15 counties included in the study.
- Of course they don't prevent crime or protect anybody.  The registry is nothing more than vengeance, to punish all ex-offenders for the heinous crimes of a few.  It's about vengeance and shaming, nothing more.

A more comprehensive study was undertaken by Amanda Agan, a doctoral candidate in economics at the University of Chicago, and published recently in the Journal of Law and Economics. Analyzing data from across the country, she detected no tangible gains from this approach.

"Rates of sex offense do not decline after the introduction of a registry or public access to a registry via the Internet, nor do sex offenders appear to recidivate less when released into states with registries," she writes. Evidence from Washington, D.C., shows no connection between the number of sex offenders on a block and the rate of sex crimes.

That doesn't mean you and I are crazy to prefer knowing about the pedophile next door. But it suggests that the information offers no actual benefit.

After all, most convicted sex offenders do not go on to be arrested for new sex offenses, and more than 90 percent of child victims are assaulted not by strangers but by relatives or other people they know.

Sex offender registries may cause parents to focus on the remote peril while ignoring the more pertinent one. And, as in the examples cited earlier, they can inflict harsh punishment that departs from common sense and does nothing for public safety.

Shielding citizens from vicious predators is unquestionably one of the central functions of any sound government. Megan's Laws were enacted in the sensible pursuit of that goal. What they offer in practice, though, is counterfeit comfort.


Wednesday, August 3, 2011

HI - Two Teens Still on Run from Juvenile Sex-Offender Treatment Facility

Original Article

08/02/2011

By Ron Mizutani

Honolulu Police continue to search for two teenage boys who escaped from a juvenile sex-offender treatment facility in Pearl City Sunday night. The incident has re-ignited concerns about the treatment center which is a quarter mile away from two schools.

It's known to Pearl City residents as Benchmark, a 10-bed facility on the Waimano Training School and Hospital grounds that treats teenage boys 12-through-18 who aren't classified as sexual predators or violent sexual offenders but have had sexual relations with family members. The teens are ordered by the court to receive residential treatment; most are there for 1-to-2 years.

"The facility is secure, it's surrounded by a 10-foot fence," said Janice Okubo of the State Health Department. "There's an additional three-feet of fencing over that 10 feet. There's also surveillance cameras inside and outside of the facility. The last time we had a run-away from the facility was back in 2005."
- Secure?  Really?  Then how did two teens escape?

That changed at 7-30 Sunday night when two teens, a 14-year-old and a 15-year-old escaped from the facility during a fire alarm.

"They assured us that none of this would happen and should anybody escape we would be the first line that they would inform," said Pearl City resident Myrna Sugiyama.

"I guess we just have to keep our door locked again and just make sure everything is secure," said Lois Miyashiro.

Miyashiro and Sugiyama were part of a group that strongly opposed the facility in 2000 when it first opened. Many were concerned that teenage sex-offenders who escaped would be a threat to children at nearby Momilani Elementary School and Pearl City High School.

"We brought up all the reasons why it shouldn't be there the high school is right there, the elementary school is right there and so at that point we told them we didn't want it," said Miyashiro.

"In fact they said they wouldn't be in your backyard they'll be way far away from the facility but then we said well they have to come through our neighborhood don't they," said Sugiyama.

The facility is run by Benchmark, one of the largest mental health agencies in the U.S. Benchmark is contracted by the state. Its executive director declined to comment. The state is investigating.

"There are many success stories and these kids are able to stay in the community and to get better in their own communities and be close to their family and get the best kind of treatment that the could possible have in Hawaii," said Okubo.

In the meantime the teenagers remain on the run. The state says because of confidentiality issues, a description of the minors cannot be given.


Wednesday, July 20, 2011

NJ - When Horseplay Becomes a Life Sentence - Children are ruined for life!

Original Article
Previous Article

By Brian Campbell

I have read newspapers my entire life. It's a hazardous occupation, with the negative and the stupid and the tragic far outweighing the uplifting elements of society. But I have never felt like this – sick to my stomach and full of anger. Jurisprudence in this country has died with this decision.

In Somerset County, two young boys became branded as lifelong sex offenders for, well, being boys. As fourteen year olds, they roughhoused and in a disgusting act, sat on the face of a fell student with their bare buttocks. As my grandmother once said, it is boys being boys, an unexplainable phenomenon left over from the cavemen days. I certainly do not condone it. I have never done it myself nor had it done to me. Among friends it is known to be a funny, but disgusting form of horseplay. Among those that are not friends, it is the most vile and embarrassing form of bullying and should be punished with significant amounts of suspension, community service, and counseling.

But branding them as perverts, child molesters and rapists? And for the rest of their lives? Today, their neighbors are fretting about the devaluation of the neighborhood, because a sex offender living in a section of town ruins that section of town. When they are eighteen and they go to apply for college, they will be sex offenders. God knows I wouldn't want my freshman in college sharing a room with a sex offender or even being in the same dorm as a sex offender. When they are in their twenties and start to seriously date, they are sex offenders. God knows I wouldn't want my daughter dating a sex offender, or worse yet, marrying one. At least my daughter could easily find out that he is a sex offender, so she could break off the relationship. When they head out to the job world, they are sex offenders. How often do companies hire sex offenders? When they go and buy a house, you guessed it. Never mind bringing over apple pie; the new neighbors will be protesting up and down the sidewalks. A child molester has moved in next door. If they get through all of this, and are fortunate to have a family, their children will find out that daddy is a branded sex offender.

All because they bullied another boy, did something they shouldn't have done for attention and laughter – something done by countless boys over many generations. Terrible? Yes. Bullying? Yes. Vile? Yes. A life sentence as a sexual predator? Lord help us.

I wondered when the extreme nature of Megan's Law would begin to destroy quasi-innocent people, a law where there is no rehabilitation, no flexibility, no timeline, and no way out. I could be wrong, but a young boy who sits on another young boy for schoolroom giggles is not the same as the man that assaulted and murdered Megan Kanka.
- Um, it's already ruining innocent lives, all one has to do is read the news, or this blog.  Also, we are talking about sex offenders here, and not all sex offenders assaulted and murdered Megan Kanka.

It is torture we have instituted, particularly those branded sex offenders who are not, nor never have been, true sex offenders. I got an idea: let's cut the arms off of children that shoplift.

Shame on the Somerset Appellate Court, and the judges that passed down such a decision. Shame on the trial court judge who found the boys guilty of criminal sexual conduct. Shame on the prosecutors for making a name for themselves with this nonsense. An absentee protest by one or many of them would have been heroic. But instead, collectively, they have ruined the lives of these two young boys. They did the cutting.

Shame on the makers and supporters of this law, for leaving such loopholes in place. Hopefully, the Supreme Court takes this case and changes the extreme aspects of Megan's Law to ensure this doesn't happen again. Hopefully, the decision is reversed and the boys get the boyhood punishment they deserve, not the lifelong sentence they have received.



NJ - Two teens labeled sex offenders for life after 'horseplay' incident (Will your child's life be ruined next?)

Original Article

Also take the poll at the article above.

07/20/2011

By MaryAnn Spoto

SOMERSET COUNTY — Call it bullying or call it horseplay. Either way, a state appellate court panel says roughhousing with a sexual connotation by a pair of 14-year-old Somerset County boys was a crime that requires them to register as sex offenders for the rest of their lives.
- The legal system is a total joke these days.  Ruining kids lives before they even start, that is just pure evil, IMO.  What ever happened to the parents disciplining them, or sending them off to juvenile detention centers?  This is what happens when the government intrudes into our lives, they ruin them, just like everything else they try to control.

In a decision handed down Monday, the three-judge panel acknowledged the severity of its decision, but said it was bound to uphold the law.

"We are keenly aware that our decision may have profound lifelong ramifications for these two boys as well as others similarly situated," Judge Jose Fuentes wrote.
- What would you do if it was your own son?  Hell, it may be one day!

One of the boys, whose case went to trial, said he had sat on the faces of a pair of 12-year-old schoolmates with his bare buttocks in November 2008 "cause I thought it was funny and I was trying to get my friends to laugh," he told a family court judge.

But an act is considered criminal sexual contact if it is done for sexual gratification or to degrade or humiliate the victim, and punishable by lifetime registration — even for juveniles — under Megan’s Law, which requires a person convicted of a sex crime against a child to notify police of changes of address or employment.
- So are you going to label all the college hazing incidents as well?  When in the hell will this SEX hysteria stop?

The trial judge concluded the teenager intended to humiliate or degrade his victims and found him guilty of criminal sexual contact. The second teenager who was implicated pleaded guilty to criminal sexual contact, and received the same penalty.

The convictions were appealed, and the attorneys for the teenagers argued that their behavior amounted to horseplay, which other appellate court panels had exempted from Megan’s Law. David Fassett, an attorney for the boy who pleaded guilty, argued that the court should not take such a literal view of the law.

"I think the Appellate Division was simply offended by the conduct here and just couldn’t get past that issue,’’ he said.
- How many kids can you think of when you were growing up, or maybe yourself, who did the same thing?  Now you get ruined for life for stupid stuff, as in this case.  If the judges have no discretion anymore, then why do we even have judges anymore?

The appeal did not challenge the application of Megan’s Law to the 14-year-old youths since courts have already ruled the law applies to offenders as young as 13, but on the ground that the offense was not severe enough to carry a lifelong stigma.

SOME VIEW RULING AS 'HARSH' PUNISHMENT

Ronald Chen, the state’s former public advocate who is vice dean at Rutgers-Newark Law School, said in an interview that the ruling highlights the "collateral" consequences of Megan’s Law.

He said that although the boys’ convictions for criminal sexual contact met the law’s requirements, "I don’t think lifelong registration is a proportionate response.’’
- Of course it's excessive, it's cruel and unusual punishment!

Chen said that is something the Legislature has to take up.

"It is a very harsh result and maybe the Legislature should take a look at it,’’ he said. "But for now, it is what it is.’’
- So, when are lawyers going to grow a pair, and step up and fight these laws, which are ruining hundreds of thousands, if not millions of lives?  Wait until it affects you, but by then, it will be too late.

The panel, which also included Judges Victor Ashrafi and William Nugent, noted its constraints under the law.

"Although we are not unsympathetic to the arguments criticizing the application of the lifelong registration requirements in (Megan’s Law) to 14-year-old offenders, we are bound to uphold such application because that outcome is mandated by the Legislature,’’ the court said in its ruling.
- I thought judges had discretion?  Apparently not anymore, so like I asked above, what good are judges for anymore?

The Somerset County prosecutor, Geoffrey Soriano, and Robert Wilson, a lawyer for the teenager who was tried, both declined to comment.

For the boys, who are now 16, there is still a possibility of having their convictions overturned. The appellate panel sent their cases back to Superior Court, where one youth will have a hearing on whether he understood the ramifications of pleading guilty, and the other will get to argue that his trial attorney was ineffective.


Sunday, April 10, 2011

TN - Tennessee bill would shield juvenile sex offenders registry from public

Original Article

04/10/2011

By Beth Warren

In a controversy highlighted by several local cases, Tennessee lawmakers and officials across the nation are debating how to manage minors who commit rape and other violent sex crimes.

This week a Shelby County judge will decide what to do with Memphis' youngest known rapists, ages 7 and 9, who admitted luring a 2-year-old neighbor from her yard in August.

A previous Juvenile Court judge removed the boys from their families over concerns about their home environments. The case is being appealed Wednesday before a new judge.

A 15-year-old is awaiting trial in adult court on charges of raping and beating a 23-month-old girl last summer in Cordova.

The boys were among about 100 juveniles accused of violent sex crimes last year, said Larry Scroggs, the court's chief administrative officer.

"It's very disturbing," he said. "It reflects the environment and what they're exposed to."

Last week, a 14-year-old was charged with sexually assaulting a 2-year-old relative.

Many juvenile offenders first victimize siblings or cousins and later progress to attacking strangers, schoolmates, neighbors or dates, Scroggs said.

For the past few years, state lawmakers have fought over whether residents should have access to the names of these minors.

The debate centers on how to balance the public's right to know -- and protect children from sexual predators -- to a juvenile offender's right to a second chance.

A 2006 federal mandate initially required states to create a juvenile sex offender registry accessible to the public.

Yet, five years later, Tennessee and 45 other states have yet to comply, said Linda M. Baldwin, director of the federal Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering and Tracking (SMART).

Due to the sluggish response, federal officials made the significant concession this year of allowing the registries to be private.
- All registries should be private, to stop harassment and vigilantism of sex offenders and their families.

And SMART officials, who are part of the U.S. Department of Justice, extended the deadline until July 27. After that, states not in compliance could lose millions of dollars in federal Byrne grants, dispersed to local law enforcement agencies.
- As shown in other posts on this blog, it will cost millions more to implement the laws, so they spend tens of millions to get a million or less of funds?

State Sen. Brian Kelsey, R-Germantown, is sponsoring a bill he feels will pass this year due to some major tweaks. He is working on the most significant change -- making the registry private.

That means, unlike the adult registry, the list would be accessible only to police, prosecutors, judges and court officials. Since offenders would have to update their address anytime they moved, it helps police track their movements.
- Like I said above, even the adult registry should be private, like it originally was.  Then you could just have one registry with all criminals on it.

Lawmakers initially debated a public registry, but critics quashed the measure.

Opponents said juveniles and their families would be ostracized at school, church, work and their neighborhoods. Being labeled a "sex offender" could hinder the minor's college and job prospects, said Linda O'Neal, executive director of the Tennessee Commission on Children and Youth.
- It's the same for adults as well.  They cannot get jobs, homes, are harassed by neighbors, etc.

"For a young person going on a registry, they feel like their lives are ruined," said O'Neal, who lobbied to defeat bills for a public registry.
- Amen, the same applies for adults as well.

"For most of them it's not a calculated decision to do this. It happens."

The state's proposed registry would only encompass those age 14 or older who commit or attempt the following violent sex crimes: rape or aggravated rape; rape or aggravated rape of a child, if the victim is at least four years younger; or aggravated sex battery.

Judges would have discretion to keep juveniles off the registry.

The TBI has maintained a similar registry for adult offenders since 1995.

There are currently about 14,000 on the list, including more than 2,000 sex offenders in Shelby County.

Some minors, guilty of the most egregious cases, are already on the registry after they were sent to adult court and convicted as adults. Their names can be viewed by the public.

But most juvenile sex offenders are shielded from public scrutiny.
- All criminals should be shielded from public scrutiny.

That's because the state's juvenile code is designed around treatment, not punishment, with a mission to "remove from children committing delinquent acts the taint of criminality and the consequences of criminal behavior and to substitute, therefore, a program of treatment, training and rehabilitation."
- So again, another person admitting the adult registry is about punishment! This should be the goal for everyone, not just kids.

Similarly, national juvenile criminal records have long been considered sacrosanct, accessible only to prosecutors, judges, police and others in the criminal justice system.

But one teen, herself a victim of a juvenile sex offender, helped shatter that shield of silence.

Amie Zyla was age 17 in 2006 when she convinced lawmakers in her home state of Wisconsin to pass "Amie's Law," allowing police to notify neighbors if a potentially dangerous juvenile sex offender lives nearby.

Zyla, of Waukesha, Wis., was 8 when she was abused by a 14-year-old, who later went to prison for preying on boys. Zyla thought the boys could have been protected if the community had known of her abuse, said Brad Schimel, Waukesha County district attorney, who prosecuted Zyla's abuser.

Wisconsin already had a juvenile registry, but it initially was kept private.

Zyla's story motivated federal lawmakers to pass the federal mandate.

A key reason to create private registries is that juvenile sex offenders are much more amenable to treatment, compared to adults, said clinical psychologist Sidney Ornduff, who evaluates the Memphis minors.
- Many adults are as well, if you give them a chance.

"Children are not simply little adults," she said. "They're still developing."
- I agree, yet when they commit some crimes, they are all of a sudden adults, charged as adults.  It seems you hypocrites want it both ways.  Either they are or aren't adults.

With the proper mental health counseling and guidance, most minors are less likely to repeat their inappropriate sexual behavior, whether it's as minor as flashing someone or as serious as rape, said Ornduff, director of Juvenile Court's Clinical Services.
- Hell, most adults are less likely to commit another related crime, if you stop ignoring the facts.

Some studies show the national recidivism rate for adolescent sex offenders who receive treatment as low as 5 to 14 percent, according to the National Center on Sexual Behavior of Youth.

Of 162 Memphis minors accused of sex crimes in 2009, only five -- or 3 percent -- have since committed another sex crime, according to a juvenile court study completed last month.

Tennessee lawmakers will take another vote on the proposed private registry this spring as a last attempt to meet the federal deadline.


Monday, March 28, 2011

WA - A Girl’s Nude Photo, and Altered Lives

Original Article

03/26/2011

By JAN HOFFMAN

LACEY - One day last winter Margarite posed naked before her bathroom mirror, held up her cellphone and took a picture. Then she sent the full-length frontal photo to Isaiah, her new boyfriend.

Both were in eighth grade.

They broke up soon after. A few weeks later, Isaiah forwarded the photo to another eighth-grade girl, once a friend of Margarite’s. Around 11 o’clock at night, that girl slapped a text message on it.

Ho Alert!” she typed. “If you think this girl is a whore, then text this to all your friends.” Then she clicked open the long list of contacts on her phone and pressed “send.”

In less than 24 hours, the effect was as if Margarite, 14, had sauntered naked down the hallways of the four middle schools in this racially and economically diverse suburb of the state capital, Olympia. Hundreds, possibly thousands, of students had received her photo and forwarded it.

In short order, students would be handcuffed and humiliated, parents mortified and lessons learned at a harsh cost. Only then would the community try to turn the fiasco into an opportunity to educate.

Around the country, law enforcement officials and educators are struggling with how to confront minors who “sext,” an imprecise term that refers to sending sexual photos, videos or texts from one cellphone to another.

But adults face a hard truth. For teenagers, who have ready access to technology and are growing up in a culture that celebrates body flaunting, sexting is laughably easy, unremarkable and even compelling: the primary reason teenagers sext is to look cool and sexy to someone they find attractive.

Indeed, the photos can confer cachet.

Having a naked picture of your significant other on your cellphone is an advertisement that you’re sexually active to a degree that gives you status,” said Rick Peters, a senior deputy prosecuting attorney for Thurston County, which includes Lacey. “It’s an electronic hickey.”

In the fall of 2009, Margarite, a petite, pretty girl with dark hair and a tiny diamond stud in her nose, was living with her father, and her life was becoming troubled. Her relationship with her father’s new wife was tense. Her grades were in a free fall.

Her social life was deteriorating. A good friendship with a girl had soured, abetted by a fight over a boy. This girl would be the one who would later brand Margarite’s photo and forward it.

Margarite’s former friend is tough and strong-willed, determined to stand out as well as fit in, according to those who know her. Her parents, recent immigrants, speak limited English and were not able to supervise her texting.

In the shifting power dynamics of middle school girls, the former friend understood well that she who sneers first sneers best. The flick of a cutting remark, swiftly followed by “Just kidding!” The eye roll. As the animosity between the two girls escalated, Margarite felt shunned by an entire group of girls and was eating lunch by herself. At home she retreated to her bedroom, alone with her cellphone and computer.

Her mother would later speculate that Margarite desperately needed to feel noticed and special. That December, just before the holidays, she took the photo of herself and sent it to Isaiah, a low-key, likable athlete she had recently gotten to know.

After the winter break, Margarite was preparing a fresh start. She would move back in with her mother and transfer to a school in a nearby district.

But one night in late January, a few days before her transfer, Margarite’s cellphone began vibrating around 1 a.m., waking her. She was being bombarded by texts — alerts from worried friends, leers from boys she scarcely knew.

The next morning in her mother’s car, Margarite lowered her head, hiding her reddened eyes, her terrible secret.



Saturday, March 5, 2011

KY - 14-year old child pornographers? Sexting lawsuits get serious

Original Article

03/04/2011

By Nate Anderson

If a middle-aged man meets a 14-year-old girl, coerces her to film a 10-second clip of herself masturbating, then intentionally releases that clip on the Internet, the man could clearly be charged under US federal law against the “sexual exploitation of children.” But what happens when the “man” is a 14-year-old boy who the 14-year old girl likes? And what if the "coercion" to make the film is the boy's threat not to befriend the girl in their new high school without the video?

An ongoing federal court case in Kentucky is currently trying to answer some of the thorniest questions surrounding "sexting," the practice of sending sexually explicit photographs or videos to friends or lovers. Rules designed to stop predatory adults from taking advantage of children become murkier when both parties involved in sexting are kids; in fact, no federal precedent exists for these kinds of sexting suits against minors.

A new ruling in the Kentucky case will allow that lawsuit to move forward, however, with the judge deciding that even 14-year olds can be child pornographers.

The opposite of "friendship"

The case began late in 2005, when an eighth grade girl at the Montessori Middle School of Kentucky was suffering from anorexia and had to relocate to a treatment center in Arizona. After two months at the Remuda Ranch facility there, she returned to Kentucky to finish the school year.

Soon after she came back, she developed a crush on a boy; the two would attend the same Lexington Catholic High School in the fall of 2006 as freshmen. According to the complaint, the boy soon “made several telephone calls to the Plaintiff telling her that he wanted her to create a video with her telephone showing herself pleasuring herself, a video which Defendant [name redacted] said he would use when he masturbated."

The girl at first refused, but the boy allegedly told her that "he would not be her friend at Lexington Catholic High School" without the video.

This continued for some time, with the boy allegedly sending text messages to the girl in June 2006 in which he promised to “keep the sexually explicit video secret.” The girl gave in. According to the complaint, she was “finally coerced, enticed, and persuaded” to produce an 8 to 10 second video clip of herself masturbating, which she sent to the boy using her cell phone.

Fast-forward to September, when both the boy and the girl entered ninth grade at Lexington Catholic. Only a few weeks into the school year, the boy was allegedly convinced by one of his friends to transfer the cell phone video to his computer. From there, it was a small step to uploading the short clip onto the Internet, with predictable results. (An alleged attempt to upload the clip to YouTube, where it might have received even wider dissemination, was “unsuccessful because of the sexually explicit nature of the content.”)

The video was “received by students and was in many cases uploaded by Lexington Catholic High School students to their iPods in order to share the sexually explicit video with as many students at Lexington Catholic high school as possible,” said the complaint. Students at three other local high schools allegedly viewed the clip as well, and students began calling the girl in the video "a whore, 'nasty Nat,' and the 'porn queen'."

The girl's mother immediately got involved, calling the boy in question and allegedly getting him to admit that he had distributed the video. The mother then went to the police, told her story, and convinced a detective to investigate. Nothing came of the investigation, because the detective eventually told the mother that the girl "could be seen as having been as guilty as the Defendants" for producing and distributing child pornography.

The girl's family was harassed, having their home vandalized and receiving numerous prank phone calls, for three years after the release of the clip. The girl claims to have been “subjected to a daily routine of harassment” at school and eventually suffered from “depression, anxiety, mental anguish, embarrassment, and extreme stress.” She was eventually advised, for her own mental and physical well-being, to finish high school elsewhere.

She did so, eventually relocating out of state to a private school in order to finish her education, at a cost of thousands of dollars to her parents.

The tale, as laid out in the complaint, is undeniably horrific, even more so when one considers the girl's existing psychological vulnerability. But did someone break the law? And if so, what law was it?



Wednesday, January 26, 2011

UK - Girl, 15, guilty of false rape accusation against 14-year-old

Original Article

01/26/2011

A teenage girl has been convicted of making a false rape allegation against a boy of 14.

The 15-year-old, from Lydney, willingly had sex with him during a game of 'truth or dare' with other youngsters.

But her untrue allegation led to the boy being arrested and questioned by detectives until they became satisfied he was telling the truth about her consenting to sex, Cheltenham youth court heard.

The girl, now 16, denied she attempted to pervert the course of justice by making a false rape allegation. But after a three day trial the magistrates found her guilty.

Julian Kesner, prosecuting, told the court the girl, who cannot be named because of her age, initially told police that she and the boy were alone in his room in Lydney when the incident happened in August.

But she later changed her story and said two other young people were in the room at the time.

Mr Kesner said she told police she tried to push the boy away and told him to stop. Eventually, she said, she pushed him off and shouted for her friend. She later told her friend what had happened and alleged rape in three different police interviews.

Mr Kesner said: "The boy told police that he asked if the girl had ever had sex and did she wanted to try it. She told him she did and they had sex with her consent."

He said the other two young people backed up much of this account and had certainly been in the room at the time. They said that the girl did not shout for her friend and, the following day, she and her alleged attacker were seen holding hands. The court heard that the girl did not tell anyone about the alleged rape for some days afterwards, and when she did, it was because she thought she might be pregnant.

In evidence yesterday the girl admitted she had told lies to police but maintained she had been raped.

She said she'd told the boy she did not want to have sex with him and tried to push him off but had been too frightened to shout out to the other two teen in the room.

She was found guilty and the case was adjourned for sentencing at a later date.


Friday, November 19, 2010

MI - Stigma of being on the sex offender registry, pushes a teen to kill himself

Original Article

11/16/2010

A recent horrifying case involving teen suicide has gotten wide attention. The case got Michigan Radio’s Political Analyst Jack Lessenberry thinking about the state’s sex offender registry.

If news is what people are talking about, then the big story in Michigan last week wasn’t the budget deficit, or Governor-elect Rick Snyder’s efforts to put together an administration.

No, the big story was a horrifying case where a fourteen-year-old girl killed herself after having sex with an eighteen-year-old boy.

And it ought to make us all think about a lot of things, including whether the Michigan Sex Offender registry makes any sense.

In this tragic case, both teens at first told police the act was consensual, but later the girl appeared on local TV news, and said she had been raped. Following that, the kids in her high school evidently turned on her. Eventually, the child went home and hung herself. This story is distressing on too many levels to count.

Whatever actually happened between the teens is hard to determine, though police say the girl said she told the boy she was eager to lose her virginity. If so, she later had second thoughts. As a journalist, I am appalled that a local so-called news station put this child on TV, identifying her by name, as she talked about her sex life.

Grownups ought to know how cruel the world can be.

But this whole episode really ought to draw attention to an appalling institution called the Michigan Sex Offender Registry.

Since the 1990s, the registry has listed anyone convicted of a so-called sex crime and indicates where they live. The idea was to protect children by allowing families to discover if a convicted sex offender lives in the neighborhood.

That may make some sense in the case of serious pedophiles, though it also could be seen as a dangerous invitation to vigilante action. But the registry also includes those convicted of a wide variety of far lesser offenses, including drunk frat boys who relieved themselves in public. They are on there with the serial rapists.

The main problem is in cases like this one. In Michigan sixteen is the legal age of consent. But in our highly sexualized society, there are many sixteen year old boys who are active with their almost sixteen year old girlfriends. Legally, they are committing a felony.

If they are caught, they will end up on the registry, and you can imagine what that will do to their futures.

A few years ago, I knew of a seventeen-year-old honor student who was taken to court for having relations with his underage girlfriend. Upon finding out he’d be on the registry, he killed himself by driving into the path of a huge truck.

In the case now making headlines, the student who was the dead girl’s sex partner wasn’t old enough to legally drink, but he was headed to hard time in prison, even if she had admitted that she solicited him. Our law has no tolerance for sex with underage minors, no matter the circumstances. The young man would also have been on the sex offender list for at least twenty-five years.

But ironically, he won’t be on that list now, since the only witness is dead. I’m not saying he should be, nor am I condoning whatever his behavior was. I am saying there is something terribly wrong with this system.


Monday, November 15, 2010

MI - Michigan sex laws create trouble, tragedy for high schoolers

Original Article

11/15/2010

By Brad Canze

[name withheld]’s death can be attributed, at least in part, to laws and social practices that create hapless victims where there should be none.

[name withheld] was a 14-year-old student at Huron High School in Ann Arbor who had engaged in sex with [name withheld], an 18-year-old student at the same school. The Detroit News reported that both teens told police and school officials that [name withheld] participated consensually.

After [name withheld]’s parents filed charges of third-degree criminal sexual conduct against [name withheld], she began to be bullied and harassed endlessly at school. She was in an environment where, by the nature of public schools, she could not escape her harassers.

One week ago, [name withheld] hanged herself in her mother’s trailer-park home, choosing to take the ultimate drastic step to escape the bullying, embarrassment and shame of her situation.

There is so much wrong with this situation that it is hard to even list everything.

It is obvious and easy to blame the bullies. Most high school students do not understand the laws about statutory rape, and would assume that this young girl was trying to attack or harm their friend.

The unfortunate situation itself was created by Michigan’s age of consent law, which stands in complete contrast with the layout of the public school system.

The age of consent in Michigan is 16. That creates an environment in high schools where hundreds of teenagers are packed in close proximity, hormones and sexual discovery taking its hold to some degree in each of them. However, if a person from the older half, one way or another, has sex with a person from the other half, that person is liable to be charged with a felony and have their name and picture listed in Michigan’s sex offender registry for 25 years.

Furthermore, the high school environment makes ridicule and having to face the situation every day unavoidable once it becomes public knowledge. There is no law on the books to relocate either party or keep them separate once something as serious and personal as sex-crime charges are filed.

Laws and practices in Michigan need to be changed to protect young people from such ugly happenings.

In Canadian law, there is a close-in-age exemption for minors under the age of consent — which is also 16 — where a person aged 14 or 15 can consent to sex with somebody up to five years older than them.

It may seem drastic or strange, but in the current high school environment cases such as [name withheld]’s are unavoidable. Change needs to happen, and that could come either by adjusting the law or restructuring public schools to keep students over the age of consent separate from those under.

If that cannot or does not happen, special provisions should be taken for young people in situations similar to [name withheld]. The court of public opinion is cold and remorseless, more so in high school, when most are not emotionally equipped to face its judgment.


Wednesday, October 20, 2010

UK - Boy And Girl Killed Suspected Paedophile

Original Article

10/20/2010

By Richard Williams

A teenage boy and girl have been found guilty of killing suspected paedophile [name withheld] in London.

The 15-year-old boy was convicted of murdering the 45-year-old victim. The girl, also 15, was found guilty of manslaughter.

Mr [name withheld] collapsed after being stabbed five times at his home in Brixton, south London, on April 23.

The prosecution told the Old Bailey the teenagers, then both aged 14, had gone "to teach him a lesson".

Earlier, on the day of the slaying, Mr [name withheld] had been informed the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was dropping a sex allegation case against him.

The girl, her 15-year-old sister and a woman had previously complained to police that the heavy drinking crack-user had abused them.

Soon after receiving a call from police telling him lawyers considered there was a lack of evidence to press charges, Mr [name withheld] rang the older sister.

She texted him back: "Stop calling and texting me. I really don't want anything to do with you. You are a perverted man."

The court heard she rang her younger sister and the boy - the father of the baby she was expecting.

The 14-year-olds - who cannot be named for legal reasons - then went to Mr [name withheld]'s home, where a struggle broke out in the kitchen. He died after two knife wounds punctured his heart.

The pair denied the charges and claimed the victim had grabbed the girl round her throat and was trying to indecently assault her.

They said the boy started jabbing him with a knife to try to free the girl, as she struggled with 6ft 1in Mr [name withheld].

Jonathan Rees QC, prosecuting, said evidence suggested Mr [name withheld] was a "Jekyll and Hyde character", but warned "this is not a vigilante society" and people were not allowed to take the law into their own hands.

The victim's mother Inez Marks said in a statement to the court: "It feels like I have been stabbed in the heart. I don't think I will ever get over it."

The teenagers were remanded in custody for sentencing on November 17.



Tuesday, August 17, 2010

TX - Grandma Accused of Prostituting Girl

Like we and many others have said over and over, most kids are sexually abused, or abused, by their own family or relatives, and this is yet another example of that.