Tuesday, January 22, 2013

WI - Where Should Sex Offenders Live When They're Released?

Original Article

Anywhere they want!

01/21/2013

By Heather Asiyanbi

After they've served their time, sex offenders by statute must be released into the communities where they committed their crimes. Understandably, this doesn't sit well with potential neighbors, but they have to go somewhere, right?

The almost-release of convicted sex offender [name withheld] into the Manree Park neighborhood touched a deep nerve throughout the community.

Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz temporarily rescinded his release order because one of [name withheld]'s victims lives just a block or two away from [name withheld]'s proposed residence at 918 Lathrop Avenue.

[name withheld] was convicted first in 1987 of second degree sexual assault and served an 18-month sentence. He was then convicted of attempted burglary and got a five-year stint in prison. Then, in 1994, he was convicted of attacking two 12-year-old girls. After he served his sentence, he was found to be sexually violent under Wisconsin's 980 law (PDF) and committed to the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center in Mauston.

State statute says that sex offenders have to be released back into the communities where they committed their crimes so [name withheld] will live, albeit under strict supervision, somewhere in Racine County. The trick, according to Lloyd Sinclair of the Department of Human Services, is finding a location that isn't too close to schools, playgrounds, or daycare centers. DHS also has to be sure that victims aren't nearby and there aren't too many other sex offenders in the neighborhood as well.

It's a tall order to be sure, and residents who live in the vicinity get vocal about not having these types of criminals in their neighborhoods.

Terri Renguette on Facebook said, "I suggest right next door to the judge, his attorney, the parole board or anyone else from the court system that think this is a safe idea. Let him be their next door neighbor around their kids and grandkids."

Patch reader C. Sanders posted a comment on an earlier story, "If they want to release this (expletive), then air drop him nude to a remote location in Antarctica. For that matter, send him into space with enough air for 30 seconds."
- And the Patch is not moderating comments!  They should've deleted this comment and forgot about it, not re-publish it.

[name withheld]'s release is still a go, and the DHS has 30 days or less to find a suitable location, per the judge's order issued Thursday.

So, readers, where should sex offenders be placed when it's time for them to be released? (See the poll at the original article)



1 comment :

SOIssues said...

Our comment left on the article follows:

They should be able to live anywhere they wish. Ex-sex offenders have one of the lowest recidivism rates of all other criminals, yet we don't have an online shaming hit-list for them. Why don't we push for a registry for all criminals?

And apparently the Patch is not moderating comments. The following should've been deleted and the person blocked from commenting. If this were said about blacks, Jews or any other race, it would be considered a hate crime / threat.

"Terri Renguette on Facebook said, "I suggest right next door to the judge, his attorney, the parole board or anyone else from the court system that think this is a safe idea. Let him be their next door neighbor around their kids and grandkids."