Original Article07/11/2011
By Martin Staunton
Police from several agencies spread out to check in with scores of sex offenders to make sure their registration information is up to date.
PINEVILLE -- Several law enforcement agencies came together in Wyoming County for a spot-check of sex offenders there. Police want to make sure that this segment of the criminal population is in compliance with the terms of their release back into the community.
Police were up early for a strategy session just before the sex-offender compliance sweep.
The officers fanned out across Wyoming County to make sure the information on file for each registered offender is up to date. Sgt. M.K. Summers is a member of the Crimes Against Children Unit of the West Virginia State Police. Summers said it's vital to community safety to maintain current information when it comes to sex offenders.
"The recidivism rate among sex offenders is extremely high and what we're trying to do by doing operations like this today is to kinda keep them in line and keep everything up to date, so if we do have something happen, we're able to find out where they're at, what they're doing, it just makes it a little easier for us to track them," said Summers.
- Once again, an ignorant police officer just repeating the same BS he has been told. The recidivism rate among sex offenders is lower than any other criminal, except murderers. Drug dealers, gang members and others have higher recidivism rates, so why don't they check on them as well?
The One Voice Drug Counseling Center in Pineville is the backdrop for the gathering of law enforcement.
Files for each of the offenders in the sweep were hauled in and assigned to a team of officers. If they discover violations, it's up to Wyoming County Prosecuting Attorney, Rick Staton, to bring charges against non-compliant sex offenders.
"It's important for both the offender and the community to make sure they're in compliance, to make sure the community is aware that this is not something that which we drop the ball, in which they just register and then nothing is followed up on, so regular check-ups are good," Staton said.
There are more than 52 sex offenders who are on the list for compliance sweep.
The law enforcement officers split into five teams, each with about 10 offenders they need to check-in with.
"Today, our primary focus is to check compliance, if there is a major offense, we'll go ahead and make an arrest there." Summers said.
The cooperative effort between agencies is a source of pride for the Prosecutor.
"We have great inter-agency cooperation between the state police and all the various agencies. I'm not surprised but then again, every time I see it happen it always makes me feel good," said Staton.
Officers from the Mullens and Oceana City Police Departments participated, as well as Wyoming County Sheriff's Deputies, the U.S. Marshal Service, and the West Virginia State Police.
- So, what was the outcome of the compliance check? I am willing to bet almost 100% were in compliance.
I think SEX OFFENDER Registration and especially all the laws that it has enabled are immoral and un-American (among many other unflattering things). I think people who are listed on the Registries should be as uncooperative as possible and retaliate (legally) as much as possible. I do believe people who are listed on Registries in the U.S. are at war with terrorists who are trying to harm them. I have read more than once from some of the worst terrorists that their goal is to "return every SEX OFFENDER to prison for life". Those people are terrorists. Those people are enemies.
ReplyDeleteTherefore, I think people on the Registries should be educated and encouraged to not allow these "compliance checks" (unless there is some legal requirement or if it is in a person's best interests (e.g. for probation/parole)). Registered people should not allow agents of the criminal governments onto their properties. Do not allow them to visit you at work. Do not allow them to call you "just to verify things" or for other dubious reasons. Do not speak with them unless it is absolutely required by law.
Believe me, they are not interested in making things any easier for you. Why should you be concerned if things are difficult for them? You know, under the P.O.S. Adam Walsh Act (POSAWA), the criminal governments make it so a person has to tell them of any "information/status change" within 3 days. How convenient is that? If you have a change on a Friday, in most jurisdictions, you will have to tell them about it on Monday only (and early enough). Would it have any effect on public safety at all if a person was given 10 days instead of 3? Knowledgeable people know that it would not.
Additionally, why is it that these changes cannot be made via the Internet? Why is that never even considered? Everything can be done via the Internet. A person can bank via the Internet. But "SEX OFFENDERS" have to drive 30 miles to some criminal government agency so they can write down that they created a new e-mail account? Are you serious? F the criminal governments responsible for that nonsense.
Anyway, allowing these "compliance checks" endorses the activity and gives silent approval to it. That is an incorrect message. The message should always and consistently be that the laws are not okay. It is beyond "not okay". It is not acceptable that the laws exist. Period. I, for one, am going to ensure that as long as the laws do exist, I am going to make sure they are worthless and there is going to be problems. It's the right thing to do.
Lastly, again, I think the author of this blog should change the "compliance check" picture/logo being used to something that is more accurate and thus less flattering and congenial. I think the picture of money being dumped into a toilet is nice. Perhaps add the words "Gestapo Operation" or something similar to the left of it? Perhaps a quote of "Show us your papers!!"?